How do Ampadu and Damsgaard compare?

Ampadu has more season points (28 vs 19), Ampadu is more owned (0.7% vs 0.3%), Ampadu has the higher Start rate (100% vs 33%), Damsgaard has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Ampadu has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.20 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Ampadu

18 stats won

Damsgaard

9 stats won

Who wins more stats: Ampadu or Damsgaard?

Ampadu wins 18 of 27 stats

Ampadu wins 18 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Damsgaard 9.

Points
Ampadu: 28Damsgaard: 19
xGI (6 gw)
Ampadu: 0.07Damsgaard: 0.12
Price
Ampadu: £5.3mDamsgaard: £5.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionAmpaduDamsgaard
Price & ownership20
Playing time40
Recent form24
Season totals22
Set pieces02
Bonus21
Fixtures10
FPL ranks50
Total189

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Ampadu: Points 28, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 126, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 11.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Damsgaard: Points 19, xGI (6 gw) 0.12, BPS 87, Mins (6 gw) 31, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Ampadu leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Price

5.3m

5.3m

Ownership

0.7%(best)

0.3%−0.4% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.2%(best)

0.0%−0.2% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ampadu leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Starts

9(best)

3−6 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

33%−67% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

352−458 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

39−51 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Damsgaard leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

31−59 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.02−0.02 vs best

0.04(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.06−0.02 vs best

0.08(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.07−0.05 vs best

0.12(best)

DC (6 gw)

11.67(best)

3.83−7.84 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.22+0.88 vs best

0.34(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Split
Who has scored more this season?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Points

28(best)

19−9 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

1

1

Total xG

0.11−0.15 vs best

0.26(best)

Total xA

0.47−0.48 vs best

0.95(best)

DC (season)

104(best)

40−64 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Damsgaard leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Corners & indirect FKs

—

2nd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Ampadu leads 2 of 3
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
BPS

126(best)

87−39 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

13.8(best)

5.2−8.6 vs best

Bonus

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Ampadu leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

BHA

(A)

10

EVE

(H)

11

MUN

(A)

12

ARS

(H)

13

MCI

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20(best)

3.60+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Ampadu leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatAmpaduDamsgaard
Form

1.8(best)

93rd MID · 212th overall

0.8

147th MID · 310th overall

ICT index

28.2(best)

70th MID · 127th overall

26.2

77th MID · 139th overall

Selected

68th MID(best)

212th overall

103rd MID

296th overall

Points per game

3.1(best)

59th MID · 149th overall

2.4

98th MID · 222nd overall

Cost rank

122nd MID(best)

197th overall

130th MID

207th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • AmpaduLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

  • DamsgaardBRE

    1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
    2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Damsgaard (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals, Ampadu (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Ampadu−0.1Ampadu: 0 goals from 0.11 xG (−0.1)
  • Damsgaard−0.3Damsgaard: 0 goals from 0.26 xG (−0.3)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Ampadu+0.5Ampadu: 1 assists from 0.47 xA (+0.5)
  • Damsgaard+0.1Damsgaard: 1 assists from 0.95 xA (+0.1)

Ampadu has 0.5 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Ampadu · 28 pts56% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Damsgaard · 19 pts58% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceAmpaduDamsgaard
Appearances1811
Assists33
Clean sheets31
Defensive contribution80
Bonus03
Other01
Deductions−40
Total2819

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Ampadu5.0(2)
  • Damsgaard4.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Ampadu3.0(4)
  • Damsgaard1.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Ampadu2.0(3)
  • Damsgaard1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Ampadu 2.0 points per game, Damsgaard 1.7 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Ampadu3.8(4)
  • Damsgaard2.8(5)

Away

  • Ampadu2.6(5)
  • Damsgaard1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Ampadu 2.6 points per game, Damsgaard 1.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Ampadu11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LEE goals

  • Damsgaard7%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 14 BRE goals

Ampadu is involved in 11% of LEE's goals, against 7% for Damsgaard.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Ampadu9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Damsgaard0 of 9 full games

    3 × 60–89, 5 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Ampadu143.6
  • Damsgaard63.4

Creativity

  • Ampadu126.2
  • Damsgaard150.4

Threat

  • Ampadu12.0
  • Damsgaard48.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Ampadu's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Damsgaard's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Ampadu−1.5k1.9k out433 in
  • Damsgaard−654797 out143 in

Managers are selling all of them; Damsgaard the least (−654 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Ampadu 5.3 points per £m (34th), Damsgaard 3.6 points per £m (83rd). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Ampadu
  • Damsgaard

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Ampadu 19, Damsgaard 7.

How far ahead is Ampadu? Above zero Ampadu leads; below, Damsgaard.

Ampadu is 12 points ahead of Damsgaard over these gameweeks. Ampadu's biggest lead was 12 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Ampadu, gameweek 4: 7 points v NEW home, 90 minutes
    Damsgaard, gameweek 4: 1 points v BOU away, 30 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Ampadu, gameweek 5: 5 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Damsgaard, gameweek 5: 3 points v CHE home, 86 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Ampadu, gameweek 6: 1 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Damsgaard, gameweek 6: 0 points v AVL away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Ampadu, gameweek 7: 1 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    Damsgaard, gameweek 7: 1 points v LIV home, 13 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Ampadu, gameweek 8: 2 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    Damsgaard, gameweek 8: 1 points v HUL away, 28 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Ampadu, gameweek 9: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Damsgaard, gameweek 9: 1 points v NFO home, 28 minutes

Ampadu: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Damsgaard: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
471
553
610
711
821
931

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
49030
59086
6900
79013
89028
99028

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
40.070.10
50.000.04
60.030.00
70.000.00
80.000.05
90.000.04

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
40.020.00
50.100.28
60.040.00
70.040.01
80.090.19
90.040.02

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
40.090.10
50.100.32
60.070.00
70.040.01
80.090.24
90.040.06

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
4124
51410
680
7103
8103
9163

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
410
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
41.0%0.5%
50.9%0.4%
60.9%0.4%
70.8%0.3%
80.8%0.3%
90.7%0.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
4£5.4m£5.5m
5£5.4m£5.4m
6£5.4m£5.4m
7£5.4m£5.3m
8£5.3m£5.3m
9£5.3m£5.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWAmpaduDamsgaard
4——
51.2%0.0%
60.4%0.0%
70.3%0.0%
80.2%0.0%
90.2%0.0%