How do Akpom and Scarlett compare?
Akpom has more season points (11 vs 0), Akpom is more owned (0.9% vs 0.8%), but Scarlett is cheaper (4.5m vs 5.0m).
Who wins more stats: Akpom or Scarlett?
Akpom wins 18 of 19 stats
Akpom wins 18 of the 19 stats with an outright best. Others: Scarlett 1.
- Points
- Akpom: 11Scarlett: 0
- xGI (6 gw)
- Akpom: 0.06Scarlett: 0.00
- Price
- Akpom: £5.0mScarlett: £4.5m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 0 |
| Playing time | 2 | 0 |
| Recent form | 4 | 1 |
| Season totals | 3 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 2 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 1 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Akpom leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.0m(best) | 4.5m−0.5m vs best |
| Ownership | 0.9%(best) | 0.8%−0.1% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Availability | Available | 0% · Has joined Leyton Orient permanently |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Akpom leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0 | 0 |
| Start rate | 0% | 0% |
| Minutes (season) | 114(best) | 0−114 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 13(best) | 0−13 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Akpom leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 8(best) | 0−8 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.06(best) | 0.00−0.06 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.06(best) | 0.00−0.06 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.33(best) | 0.00−0.33 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.32+0.32 vs best | 0.00(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Akpom leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11(best) | 0−11 vs best |
| Goals | 1(best) | 0−1 vs best |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 1.30(best) | 0.00−1.30 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.00 | 0.00 |
See alsoForward stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Akpom leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 54(best) | 0−54 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 3.5(best) | 0.0−3.5 vs best |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BOU (H) 10 TOT (A) 11 AVL (H) 12 COV (A) 13 LEE (A) 14 | LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Akpom leads 5 of 5
| Stat | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 1.0(best) 27th FWD · 278th overall | 0.0 46th FWD · 511th overall |
| ICT index | 7.7(best) 36th FWD · 322nd overall | 0.0 53rd FWD · 552nd overall |
| Selected | 27th FWD(best) 195th overall | 28th FWD 199th overall |
| Points per game | 1.6(best) 33rd FWD · 306th overall | 0.0 54th FWD · 553rd overall |
| Cost rank | 51st FWD(best) 249th overall | 66th FWD 472nd overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
AkpomIPS
- IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance
ScarlettTOT
- TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Scarlett (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Akpom (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Akpom−0.3Akpom: 1 goals from 1.30 xG (−0.3)
- Scarlett±0.0Scarlett: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Assists vs xA
- Akpom±0.0Akpom: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
- Scarlett±0.0Scarlett: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a assist of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Akpom · 11 pts64% from appearances
Scarlett · 0 pts
| Source | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 7 | 0 |
| Goals | 4 | 0 |
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Akpom1.0(3)
- ScarlettNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Akpom2.3(3)
- ScarlettNo games
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Akpom1.0(1)
- ScarlettNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Akpom1.0(3)
- ScarlettNo games
Away
- Akpom2.0(4)
- ScarlettNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Akpom9%
1 goal and 0 assists of 11 IPS goals
Scarlett
No TOT goals yet in matches played
Who is a rotation risk?
Akpom0 of 9 full games
7 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Scarlett0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Akpom37.6
- Scarlett0.0
Creativity
- Akpom5.7
- Scarlett0.0
Threat
- Akpom34.0
- Scarlett0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Akpom's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Scarlett's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Akpom−3.0k3.5k out464 in
- Scarlett−2.3k2.3k out0 in
Managers are selling all of them; Scarlett the least (−2.3k net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Akpom
- Scarlett
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Akpom, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutesScarlett, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutesGW 5
Akpom, gameweek 5: 1 points v EVE away, 9 minutesScarlett, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutesGW 6
Akpom, gameweek 6: 1 points v FUL home, 19 minutesScarlett, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutesGW 7
Akpom, gameweek 7: 1 points v MCI away, 12 minutesScarlett, gameweek 7: 0 points v COV home, 0 minutesGW 8
Akpom, gameweek 8: 1 points v NFO home, 4 minutesScarlett, gameweek 8: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutesGW 9
Akpom, gameweek 9: 1 points v HUL away, 1 minutesScarlett, gameweek 9: 0 points v CRY home, 0 minutes
Akpom: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Scarlett: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 9 | 0 |
| 6 | 19 | 0 |
| 7 | 12 | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| 5 | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| 6 | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| 7 | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| 8 | 1.0% | 0.9% |
| 9 | 0.9% | 0.8% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £4.5m |
| 5 | £5.0m | £4.5m |
| 6 | £5.0m | £4.5m |
| 7 | £5.0m | £4.5m |
| 8 | £5.0m | £4.5m |
| 9 | £5.0m | £4.5m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Scarlett |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| 6 | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.0% |

