How do Akpom and Emegha compare?
Akpom has more season points (11 vs 0), Akpom is more owned (0.9% vs 0.1%), but Emegha is cheaper (4.9m vs 5.0m).
Who wins more stats: Akpom or Emegha?
Akpom wins 18 of 19 stats
Akpom wins 18 of the 19 stats with an outright best. Others: Emegha 1.
- Points
- Akpom: 11Emegha: 0
- xGI (6 gw)
- Akpom: 0.06Emegha: 0.00
- Price
- Akpom: £5.0mEmegha: £4.9m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 0 |
| Playing time | 2 | 0 |
| Recent form | 4 | 1 |
| Season totals | 3 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 2 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 1 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Akpom leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.0m(best) | 4.9m−0.1m vs best |
| Ownership | 0.9%(best) | 0.1%−0.8% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Akpom leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0 | 0 |
| Start rate | 0% | 0% |
| Minutes (season) | 114(best) | 0−114 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 13(best) | 0−13 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Akpom leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 8(best) | 0−8 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.06(best) | 0.00−0.06 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.06(best) | 0.00−0.06 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.33(best) | 0.00−0.33 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.32+0.32 vs best | 0.00(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Akpom leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11(best) | 0−11 vs best |
| Goals | 1(best) | 0−1 vs best |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 1.30(best) | 0.00−1.30 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.00 | 0.00 |
See alsoForward stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Akpom leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 54(best) | 0−54 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 3.5(best) | 0.0−3.5 vs best |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BOU (H) 10 TOT (A) 11 AVL (H) 12 COV (A) 13 LEE (A) 14 | SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Akpom leads 5 of 5
| Stat | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 1.0(best) 27th FWD · 278th overall | 0.0 57th FWD · 574th overall |
| ICT index | 7.7(best) 36th FWD · 322nd overall | 0.0 65th FWD · 605th overall |
| Selected | 27th FWD(best) 195th overall | 62nd FWD 411th overall |
| Points per game | 1.6(best) 33rd FWD · 306th overall | 0.0 65th FWD · 605th overall |
| Cost rank | 51st FWD(best) 249th overall | 64th FWD 357th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
AkpomIPS
- IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance
EmeghaCHE
- CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
- CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Emegha (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals, Akpom (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Akpom−0.3Akpom: 1 goals from 1.30 xG (−0.3)
- Emegha±0.0Emegha: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Assists vs xA
- Akpom±0.0Akpom: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
- Emegha±0.0Emegha: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a assist of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Akpom · 11 pts64% from appearances
Emegha · 0 pts
| Source | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 7 | 0 |
| Goals | 4 | 0 |
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Akpom1.0(3)
- EmeghaNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Akpom2.3(3)
- EmeghaNo games
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Akpom1.0(1)
- EmeghaNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Akpom1.0(3)
- EmeghaNo games
Away
- Akpom2.0(4)
- EmeghaNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Akpom9%
1 goal and 0 assists of 11 IPS goals
Emegha
No CHE goals yet in matches played
Who is a rotation risk?
Akpom0 of 9 full games
7 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Emegha0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Akpom37.6
- Emegha0.0
Creativity
- Akpom5.7
- Emegha0.0
Threat
- Akpom34.0
- Emegha0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Akpom's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Emegha's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Akpom−3.1k3.5k out465 in
- Emegha+93342 out435 in
Emegha has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+93).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Akpom
- Emegha
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Akpom, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutesEmegha, gameweek 4: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutesGW 5
Akpom, gameweek 5: 1 points v EVE away, 9 minutesEmegha, gameweek 5: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutesGW 6
Akpom, gameweek 6: 1 points v FUL home, 19 minutesEmegha, gameweek 6: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutesGW 7
Akpom, gameweek 7: 1 points v MCI away, 12 minutesEmegha, gameweek 7: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutesGW 8
Akpom, gameweek 8: 1 points v NFO home, 4 minutesEmegha, gameweek 8: 0 points v TOT home, 0 minutesGW 9
Akpom, gameweek 9: 1 points v HUL away, 1 minutesEmegha, gameweek 9: 0 points v MUN home, 0 minutes
Akpom: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Emegha: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 9 | 0 |
| 6 | 19 | 0 |
| 7 | 12 | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| 5 | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| 6 | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 1.1% | 0.1% |
| 8 | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| 9 | 0.9% | 0.1% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 5 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 6 | £5.0m | £4.9m |
| 7 | £5.0m | £4.9m |
| 8 | £5.0m | £4.9m |
| 9 | £5.0m | £4.9m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Emegha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.0% |

