How do Van Hecke and Vuskovic compare?

Vuskovic has more season points (58 vs 53), Van Hecke is more owned (11.3% vs 7.4%), Van Hecke is cheaper (5.0m vs 5.2m), but Van Hecke has more Bonus (6 vs 2).

← Back to players Pick different players

Van Hecke

17 stats won

Vuskovic

11 stats won

Who wins more stats: Van Hecke or Vuskovic?

Van Hecke wins 17 of 28 stats

Van Hecke wins 17 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Vuskovic 11.

Points
Van Hecke: 53Vuskovic: 58
xGI (6 gw)
Van Hecke: 0.34Vuskovic: 0.17
Price
Van Hecke: £5.0mVuskovic: £5.2m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionVan HeckeVuskovic
Price & ownership21
Playing time20
Recent form51
Season totals34
Set pieces01
Bonus22
Fixtures00
FPL ranks32
Total1711

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Van Hecke: Points 53, xGI (6 gw) 0.34, BPS 172, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 9.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Vuskovic: Points 58, xGI (6 gw) 0.17, BPS 187, Mins (6 gw) 88, DC (6 gw) 10.5, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Van Hecke leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Price

5.0m−0.2m vs best

5.2m(best)

Ownership

11.3%(best)

7.4%−3.9% vs best

Top 10k ownership

51.4%(best)

10.2%−41.2% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Van Hecke leads 2 of 2
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Starts

9

9

Start rate

100%

100%

Minutes (season)

810(best)

797−13 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

89−1 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Van Hecke leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

88−2 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.24(best)

0.15−0.09 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.10(best)

0.02−0.08 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.34(best)

0.17−0.17 vs best

DC (6 gw)

9.00−1.50 vs best

10.50(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.74(best)

1.18+0.44 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Vuskovic leads 4 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Points

53−5 vs best

58(best)

Goals

2(best)

1−1 vs best

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

1.63(best)

1.24−0.39 vs best

Total xA

0.69(best)

0.18−0.51 vs best

DC (season)

75−10 vs best

85(best)

Clean sheets

4−2 vs best

6(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Vuskovic leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

5th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Split
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
BPS

172−15 vs best

187(best)

BPS (6 gw)

21.8−2.0 vs best

23.8(best)

Bonus

6(best)

2−4 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.7(best)

0.0−0.7 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

BRE

(H)

10

HUL

(A)

11

NEW

(H)

12

BOU

(A)

13

NFO

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80

2.80

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Van Hecke leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatVan HeckeVuskovic
Form

7.2(best)

4th DEF · 6th overall

6.5

5th DEF · 11th overall

ICT index

62.0(best)

1st DEF · 15th overall

38.7

14th DEF · 64th overall

Selected

11th DEF(best)

33rd overall

16th DEF

47th overall

Points per game

5.9

8th DEF · 19th overall

6.4(best)

2nd DEF · 6th overall

Cost rank

48th DEF

284th overall

36th DEF(best)

240th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • Van HeckeTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • VuskovicBHA

    1. BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Van Hecke (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Vuskovic (BHA) 0.7 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Van Hecke+0.4Van Hecke: 2 goals from 1.63 xG (+0.4)
  • Vuskovic−0.2Vuskovic: 1 goals from 1.24 xG (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Van Hecke−0.7Van Hecke: 0 assists from 0.69 xA (−0.7)
  • Vuskovic+0.8Vuskovic: 1 assists from 0.18 xA (+0.8)

Van Hecke has 0.7 fewer assists than xA; Vuskovic has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Van Hecke±0.0Van Hecke: 10 conceded from 9.96 xGC (±0.0)
  • Vuskovic−5.8Vuskovic: 7 conceded from 12.78 xGC (−5.8)

Vuskovic has conceded 5.8 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Van Hecke · 53 pts31% from appearances

    −5 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Vuskovic · 58 pts39% from clean sheets

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceVan HeckeVuskovic
Appearances1818
Goals126
Assists03
Clean sheets1624
Defensive contribution68
Bonus62
Deductions−5−3
Total5358

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Van Hecke9.0(3)
  • Vuskovic8.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Van Hecke4.5(4)
  • Vuskovic8.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Van Hecke4.0(2)
  • Vuskovic3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Van Hecke 4.0 points per game, Vuskovic 3.8 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Van Hecke6.8(5)
  • Vuskovic9.3(4)

Away

  • Van Hecke4.8(4)
  • Vuskovic4.2(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Van Hecke 4.8 points per game, Vuskovic 4.2 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Van Hecke20%

    2 goals and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • Vuskovic8%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 24 BHA goals

Van Hecke is involved in 20% of TOT's goals, against 8% for Vuskovic.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Van Hecke9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Vuskovic8 of 9 full games

    8 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Van Hecke315.6
  • Vuskovic218.6

Creativity

  • Van Hecke149.7
  • Vuskovic38.4

Threat

  • Van Hecke156.0
  • Vuskovic130.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Van Hecke's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Vuskovic's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Van Hecke+201k4.0k out205k in
  • Vuskovic+48.4k8.0k out56.3k in

Van Hecke has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+201k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Van Hecke 10.6 points per £m (4th), Vuskovic 11.2 points per £m (2nd). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Van Hecke
  • Vuskovic

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Van Hecke 43, Vuskovic 40.

How far ahead is Van Hecke? Above zero Van Hecke leads; below, Vuskovic.

Van Hecke is 3 points ahead of Vuskovic over these gameweeks. Van Hecke's biggest lead was 3 (GW 9); Vuskovic's was 12 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Van Hecke, gameweek 4: 8 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
    Vuskovic, gameweek 4: 6 points v COV away, 77 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Van Hecke, gameweek 5: 6 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
    Vuskovic, gameweek 5: 8 points v ARS home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Van Hecke, gameweek 6: 3 points v MUN away, 90 minutes
    Vuskovic, gameweek 6: 8 points v SUN away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Van Hecke, gameweek 7: 4 points v COV home, 90 minutes
    Vuskovic, gameweek 7: 11 points v CRY home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Van Hecke, gameweek 8: 7 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Vuskovic, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Van Hecke, gameweek 9: 15 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Vuskovic, gameweek 9: 6 points v MCI away, 90 minutes

Van Hecke: 1 haul (10+), 0 blanks (0–2); Vuskovic: 1 haul (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
486
568
638
7411
871
9156

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
49077
59090
69090
79090
89090
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
40.140.11
50.350.00
60.000.27
70.000.37
80.000.14
90.940.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
40.050.01
50.300.00
60.030.01
70.050.09
80.010.01
90.180.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
40.190.12
50.650.00
60.030.28
70.050.46
80.010.15
91.120.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
4139
5912
61115
71112
886
929

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
41.111.11
51.161.63
60.800.72
70.770.77
80.471.20
90.141.64

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
400
510
600
700
800
910

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
400
500
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
46.7%3.5%
56.7%3.1%
66.1%4.3%
77.0%5.1%
86.7%6.2%
910.9%6.8%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
4£4.9m£5.0m
5£4.9m£5.0m
6£4.9m£5.0m
7£4.9m£5.1m
8£4.9m£5.1m
9£4.9m£5.2m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWVan HeckeVuskovic
4——
54.4%6.8%
63.4%6.7%
79.2%11.1%
89.3%11.4%
951.4%10.2%