How do Penders and Scherpen compare?
Penders and Scherpen are level on season points (7), Scherpen is more owned (0.5% vs 0.3%), but Scherpen has the higher Start rate (44% vs 22%).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Scherpen wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Penders or Scherpen?
Scherpen wins 12 of 18 stats
Scherpen wins 12 of the 18 stats with an outright best. Others: Penders 6.
- Points
- Penders: 7Scherpen: 7
- Saves
- Penders: 7Scherpen: 15
- Price
- Penders: £4.4mScherpen: £4.4m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 1 | 1 |
| Season totals | 1 | 2 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 1 | 1 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 2 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 12 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Split
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.4m | 4.4m |
| Ownership | 0.3%−0.2% vs best | 0.5%(best) |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.4%(best) | 0.3%−0.1% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Scherpen leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 2−2 vs best | 4(best) |
| Start rate | 22%−22% vs best | 44%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 195−165 vs best | 360(best) |
| Avg minutes | 22−18 vs best | 40(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 33(best) | 15−18 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.35+0.25 vs best | 0.10(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Scherpen leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 7 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.00−0.01 vs best | 0.01(best) |
| Clean sheets | 1(best) | 0−1 vs best |
| Saves | 7−8 vs best | 15(best) |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Split
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 31−9 vs best | 40(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 5.2(best) | 1.0−4.2 vs best |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14 | BOU (H) 10 TOT (A) 11 AVL (H) 12 COV (A) 13 LEE (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Scherpen leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 1.8(best) 19th GK · 203rd overall | 0.0 53rd GK · 468th overall |
| ICT index | 3.6 23rd GK · 377th overall | 10.3(best) 22nd GK · 289th overall |
| Selected | 39th GK 291st overall | 35th GK(best) 254th overall |
| Points per game | 2.3(best) 18th GK · 227th overall | 1.8 24th GK · 288th overall |
| Cost rank | 47th GK 549th overall | 43rd GK(best) 532nd overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
PendersCHE
- CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
- CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
ScherpenIPS
- IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Penders (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Scherpen (IPS) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Penders−0.1Penders: 2 conceded from 2.10 xGC (−0.1)
- Scherpen+3.3Scherpen: 10 conceded from 6.74 xGC (+3.3)
Scherpen has conceded 3.3 more than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Penders · 7 pts45% from appearances
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Scherpen · 7 pts62% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 5 | 8 |
| Clean sheets | 4 | 0 |
| Saves | 2 | 5 |
| Deductions | −4 | −6 |
| Total | 7 | 7 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- PendersNo games
- Scherpen1.5(2)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Penders2.3(3)
- Scherpen2.0(1)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- PendersNo games
- Scherpen2.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Penders3.0(2)
- Scherpen2.0(2)
Away
- Penders1.0(1)
- Scherpen1.5(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Scherpen 1.5 points per game, Penders 1.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Penders0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 4 CHE goals
Scherpen0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 7 IPS goals
Penders is involved in 0% of CHE's goals, against 0% for Scherpen.
Who is a rotation risk?
Penders2 of 9 full games
2 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 6 × Didn't play
Scherpen4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 5 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Penders35.6
- Scherpen103.6
Creativity
- Penders0.0
- Scherpen0.0
Threat
- Penders0.0
- Scherpen0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Penders's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Scherpen's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Penders+4.3k865 out5.2k in
- Scherpen−538612 out74 in
Penders has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+4.3k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Penders
- Scherpen
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Penders, gameweek 4: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 4: 1 points v CRY away, 90 minutesGW 5
Penders, gameweek 5: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 5: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutesGW 6
Penders, gameweek 6: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 6: 0 points v FUL home, 0 minutesGW 7
Penders, gameweek 7: 1 points v EVE away, 15 minutesScherpen, gameweek 7: 0 points v MCI away, 0 minutesGW 8
Penders, gameweek 8: 0 points v TOT home, 90 minutesScherpen, gameweek 8: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutesGW 9
Penders, gameweek 9: 6 points v MUN home, 90 minutesScherpen, gameweek 9: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes
Penders: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Scherpen: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 6 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 90 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 15 | 0 |
| 8 | 90 | 0 |
| 9 | 90 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.12 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| 5 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| 8 | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| 9 | 0.3% | 0.5% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.4m | £4.5m |
| 5 | £4.4m | £4.5m |
| 6 | £4.4m | £4.5m |
| 7 | £4.4m | £4.5m |
| 8 | £4.4m | £4.5m |
| 9 | £4.4m | £4.4m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Penders | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| 8 | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| 9 | 0.4% | 0.3% |

