How do Botman and Muharemović compare?

Muharemović has more season points (46 vs 26), Muharemović is more owned (6.1% vs 0.8%), Botman is cheaper (5.0m vs 5.1m), Muharemović has the higher Start rate (100% vs 78%), but Muharemović has more Bonus (1 vs 0).

Botman

2 stats won

Muharemović

27 stats won

Who wins more stats: Botman or Muharemović?

Muharemović wins 27 of 29 stats

Muharemović wins 27 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Botman 2.

Points
Botman: 26Muharemović: 46
xGI (6 gw)
Botman: 0.04Muharemović: 0.13
Price
Botman: £5.0mMuharemović: £5.1m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionBotmanMuharemović
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals16
Set pieces00
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks05
Total227

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Botman: Points 26, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 59, Mins (6 gw) 60, DC (6 gw) 9.2, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Muharemović: Points 46, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 161, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 9.8, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Muharemović leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Price

5.0m−0.1m vs best

5.1m(best)

Ownership

0.8%−5.3% vs best

6.1%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.2%−32.0% vs best

32.2%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Muharemović leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Starts

7−2 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

78%−22% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

630−180 vs best

810(best)

Avg minutes

70−20 vs best

90(best)

Who has better recent form?

Muharemović leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Mins (6 gw)

60−30 vs best

90(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.03−0.06 vs best

0.09(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.03 vs best

0.04(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.04−0.09 vs best

0.13(best)

DC (6 gw)

9.17−0.66 vs best

9.83(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.12(best)

1.22+0.10 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Muharemović leads 6 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Points

26−20 vs best

46(best)

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Total xG

0.21−0.44 vs best

0.65(best)

Total xA

0.22−0.01 vs best

0.23(best)

DC (season)

79−19 vs best

98(best)

Clean sheets

1−2 vs best

3(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Muharemović leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatBotmanMuharemović
BPS

59−102 vs best

161(best)

BPS (6 gw)

5.0−13.2 vs best

18.2(best)

Bonus

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.2 vs best

0.2(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Next 5 GWs

FUL

(A)

10

ARS

(H)

11

BHA

(A)

12

MUN

(H)

13

SUN

(H)

14

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20

3.20

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Muharemović leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatBotmanMuharemović
Form

2.8

45th DEF · 126th overall

4.8(best)

17th DEF · 40th overall

ICT index

29.3

37th DEF · 122nd overall

41.4(best)

11th DEF · 56th overall

Selected

80th DEF

208th overall

21st DEF(best)

60th overall

Points per game

3.7

50th DEF · 110th overall

5.1(best)

14th DEF · 36th overall

Cost rank

43rd DEF

264th overall

39th DEF(best)

243rd overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • BotmanNEW

    1. NEW v FUL away, gameweek 10: 1.12 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. NEW v ARS home, gameweek 11: 0.89 projected goals, 17% clean sheet chance
  • MuharemovićLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Muharemović (LEE) 0.5 expected clean sheets, Botman (NEW) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Botman+0.8Botman: 1 goals from 0.21 xG (+0.8)
  • Muharemović−0.7Muharemović: 0 goals from 0.65 xG (−0.7)

Muharemović has 0.7 fewer goals than xG; Botman has 0.8 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Botman−0.2Botman: 0 assists from 0.22 xA (−0.2)
  • Muharemović+1.8Muharemović: 2 assists from 0.23 xA (+1.8)

Muharemović has 1.8 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Botman+1.8Botman: 14 conceded from 12.18 xGC (+1.8)
  • Muharemović−3.8Muharemović: 8 conceded from 11.83 xGC (−3.8)

Botman has conceded 1.8 more than xGC; Muharemović has conceded 3.8 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Botman · 26 pts41% from appearances

    −8 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Muharemović · 46 pts37% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceBotmanMuharemović
Appearances1418
Goals60
Assists06
Clean sheets412
Defensive contribution1012
Bonus01
Deductions−8−3
Total2646

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Botman6.0(2)
  • Muharemović6.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Botman2.8(4)
  • Muharemović6.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Botman3.0(1)
  • Muharemović3.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Botman 3.0 points per game, Muharemović 3.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Botman2.8(4)
  • Muharemović5.5(4)

Away

  • Botman5.0(3)
  • Muharemović4.8(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Botman 5.0 points per game, Muharemović 4.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Botman10%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 10 NEW goals

  • Muharemović22%

    0 goals and 2 assists of 9 LEE goals

Muharemović is involved in 22% of LEE's goals, against 10% for Botman.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Botman7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × Didn't play

  • Muharemović9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Botman226.0
  • Muharemović264.6

Creativity

  • Botman8.1
  • Muharemović38.1

Threat

  • Botman58.0
  • Muharemović111.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Botman's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Muharemović's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Botman−2.6k3.0k out458 in
  • Muharemović+1969.6k out9.8k in

Muharemović has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+196).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Botman 5.2 points per £m (54th), Muharemović 9.0 points per £m (7th). Median 3.3.
  • Botman
  • Muharemović

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Muharemović 32, Botman 17.

How far ahead is Botman? Above zero Botman leads; below, Muharemović.

Muharemović is 15 points ahead of Botman over these gameweeks. Muharemović's was 15 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Botman, gameweek 4: 2 points v LEE away, 90 minutes
    Muharemović, gameweek 4: 7 points v NEW home, 90 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Botman, gameweek 5: 4 points v HUL home, 90 minutes
    Muharemović, gameweek 5: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Botman, gameweek 6: 8 points v COV away, 90 minutes
    Muharemović, gameweek 6: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Botman, gameweek 7: 3 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
    Muharemović, gameweek 7: 5 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Botman, gameweek 8: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutes
    Muharemović, gameweek 8: 9 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Botman, gameweek 9: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes
    Muharemović, gameweek 9: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes

Botman: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Muharemović: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
427
546
682
735
809
903

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
49090
59090
69090
79090
8090
9090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
40.000.00
50.050.40
60.040.00
70.110.06
80.000.10
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
40.000.02
50.000.01
60.020.00
70.030.16
80.000.01
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
40.000.02
50.050.41
60.060.00
70.140.22
80.000.11
90.000.01

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
41711
5188
61010
7105
8013
9012

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
42.080.88
51.591.06
61.472.33
71.570.92
80.000.83
90.001.29

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
400
500
610
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
401
500
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
40.7%3.8%
50.7%4.5%
60.8%4.5%
70.8%4.7%
80.8%5.6%
90.8%6.2%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
4£5.0m£5.0m
5£5.0m£5.0m
6£5.0m£5.0m
7£5.0m£5.0m
8£5.0m£5.0m
9£5.0m£5.1m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWBotmanMuharemović
4——
50.3%20.6%
60.4%19.0%
70.4%21.7%
80.3%36.8%
90.2%32.2%