How do McBurnie and Welbeck compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 8), McBurnie is more owned (1.7% vs 0.8%), McBurnie is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.8m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 11%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Welbeck has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

McBurnie

26 stats won

Welbeck

4 stats won

Who wins more stats: McBurnie or Welbeck?

McBurnie wins 26 of 30 stats

McBurnie wins 26 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Welbeck 4.

Points
McBurnie: 36Welbeck: 8
xGI (6 gw)
McBurnie: 0.31Welbeck: 0.02
Price
McBurnie: £5.5mWelbeck: £5.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMcBurnieWelbeck
Price & ownership21
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals50
Set pieces20
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total264

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60. Welbeck: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 27, Mins (6 gw) 16, xG (6 gw) 0.00, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

McBurnie leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Price

5.5m−0.3m vs best

5.8m(best)

Ownership

1.7%(best)

0.8%−0.9% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.6%(best)

0.0%−0.6% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Starts

9(best)

1−8 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

11%−89% vs best

Minutes (season)

796(best)

98−698 vs best

Avg minutes

88(best)

11−77 vs best

Who has better recent form?

McBurnie leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Mins (6 gw)

88(best)

16−72 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.28(best)

0.00−0.28 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.03(best)

0.02−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.31(best)

0.02−0.29 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.17(best)

1.17−3.00 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.33+0.98 vs best

0.35(best)

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Points

36(best)

8−28 vs best

Goals

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Assists

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Total xG

2.22(best)

0.00−2.22 vs best

Total xA

0.24(best)

0.14−0.10 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties

1st choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
BPS

133(best)

27−106 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

17.2(best)

4.0−13.2 vs best

Bonus

5(best)

0−5 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.8(best)

0.0−0.8 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Welbeck leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Next 5 GWs

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.60+0.80 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMcBurnieWelbeck
Form

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

1.0

32nd FWD · 287th overall

ICT index

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

6.4

38th FWD · 338th overall

Selected

20th FWD(best)

135th overall

29th FWD

202nd overall

Points per game

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

1.1

37th FWD · 351st overall

Cost rank

33rd FWD

125th overall

24th FWD(best)

95th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance
  • WelbeckCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Welbeck (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)
  • Welbeck±0.0Welbeck: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)
  • Welbeck−0.1Welbeck: 0 assists from 0.14 xA (−0.1)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Welbeck · 8 pts100% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceMcBurnieWelbeck
Appearances188
Goals80
Assists90
Bonus50
Deductions−40
Total368

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • McBurnie6.5(2)
  • Welbeck1.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • McBurnie3.2(6)
  • Welbeck1.0(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • McBurnie4.0(1)
  • Welbeck1.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Welbeck 1.5 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • McBurnie5.6(5)
  • Welbeck1.0(4)

Away

  • McBurnie2.0(4)
  • Welbeck1.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: McBurnie 2.0 points per game, Welbeck 1.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

  • Welbeck0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 12 CHE goals

McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 0% for Welbeck.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

  • Welbeck0 of 9 full games

    1 × 60–89, 6 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • McBurnie150.4
  • Welbeck15.0

Creativity

  • McBurnie104.4
  • Welbeck35.0

Threat

  • McBurnie156.0
  • Welbeck14.0

FPL's season ICT scores. McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Welbeck's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.6k in
  • Welbeck−2.6k3.6k out995 in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th), Welbeck 1.4 points per £m (34th). Median 2.3.
  • McBurnie
  • Welbeck

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Welbeck 7.

How far ahead is McBurnie? Above zero McBurnie leads; below, Welbeck.

McBurnie is 21 points ahead of Welbeck over these gameweeks. McBurnie's biggest lead was 21 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes
    Welbeck, gameweek 4: 1 points v HUL home, 12 minutes
  2. GW 5

    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes
    Welbeck, gameweek 5: 2 points v BRE away, 70 minutes
  3. GW 6

    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
    Welbeck, gameweek 6: 1 points v BOU home, 7 minutes
  4. GW 7

    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
    Welbeck, gameweek 7: 1 points v EVE away, 1 minutes
  5. GW 8

    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
    Welbeck, gameweek 8: 1 points v TOT home, 2 minutes
  6. GW 9

    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
    Welbeck, gameweek 9: 1 points v MUN home, 3 minutes

McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Welbeck: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
441
512
611
721
881
9121

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
48112
59070
6907
7901
8852
9903

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
40.330.00
50.360.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.790.00
90.200.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
40.040.06
50.020.08
60.090.00
70.000.00
80.010.00
90.010.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
40.370.06
50.380.08
60.090.00
70.000.00
80.800.00
90.210.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
431
564
650
731
830
951

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
400
500
600
700
810
910

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
410
500
600
700
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
41.9%0.8%
52.0%1.1%
61.9%1.0%
71.8%0.8%
81.6%0.7%
91.7%0.8%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
4£5.5m£5.9m
5£5.5m£5.9m
6£5.5m£5.9m
7£5.5m£5.9m
8£5.5m£5.8m
9£5.5m£5.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMcBurnieWelbeck
4——
50.4%0.3%
60.3%0.0%
70.2%0.0%
80.2%0.0%
90.6%0.0%