How do McBurnie and Strand Larsen compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 21), McBurnie is more owned (1.7% vs 0.5%), McBurnie is cheaper (5.5m vs 6.0m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 2), but Strand Larsen has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.60).

McBurnie

24 stats won

Strand Larsen

6 stats won

Who wins more stats: McBurnie or Strand Larsen?

McBurnie wins 24 of 30 stats

McBurnie wins 24 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Strand Larsen 6.

Points
McBurnie: 36Strand Larsen: 21
xGI (6 gw)
McBurnie: 0.31Strand Larsen: 0.27
Price
McBurnie: £5.5mStrand Larsen: £6.0m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Price & ownership21
Playing time40
Recent form42
Season totals41
Set pieces20
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total246

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60. Strand Larsen: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.27, BPS 95, Mins (6 gw) 51, xG (6 gw) 0.18, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

McBurnie leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Price

5.5m−0.5m vs best

6.0m(best)

Ownership

1.7%(best)

0.5%−1.2% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.6%(best)

0.0%−0.6% vs best

Availability

Available

75% · Ankle injury - 75% chance of playing

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Starts

9(best)

5−4 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

56%−44% vs best

Minutes (season)

796(best)

440−356 vs best

Avg minutes

88(best)

49−39 vs best

Who has better recent form?

McBurnie leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Mins (6 gw)

88(best)

51−37 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.28(best)

0.18−0.10 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.03−0.06 vs best

0.09(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.31(best)

0.27−0.04 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.17(best)

2.33−1.84 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.33+0.22 vs best

1.11(best)

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Points

36(best)

21−15 vs best

Goals

2(best)

1−1 vs best

Assists

3(best)

1−2 vs best

Total xG

2.22(best)

1.41−0.81 vs best

Total xA

0.24−0.29 vs best

0.53(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties

1st choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
BPS

133(best)

95−38 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

17.2(best)

12.5−4.7 vs best

Bonus

5(best)

2−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.8(best)

0.3−0.5 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Strand Larsen leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Next 5 GWs

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.60+0.60 vs best

3.00(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Form

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

1.8

24th FWD · 222nd overall

ICT index

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

22.4

20th FWD · 169th overall

Selected

20th FWD(best)

135th overall

37th FWD

257th overall

Points per game

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

3.0

17th FWD · 172nd overall

Cost rank

33rd FWD

125th overall

16th FWD(best)

69th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance
  • Strand LarsenCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Strand Larsen (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)
  • Strand Larsen−0.4Strand Larsen: 1 goals from 1.41 xG (−0.4)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)
  • Strand Larsen+0.5Strand Larsen: 1 assists from 0.53 xA (+0.5)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Strand Larsen · 21 pts57% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceMcBurnieStrand Larsen
Appearances1812
Goals84
Assists93
Bonus52
Deductions−40
Total3621

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • McBurnie6.5(2)
  • Strand Larsen8.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • McBurnie3.2(6)
  • Strand Larsen2.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • McBurnie4.0(1)
  • Strand Larsen2.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Strand Larsen 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • McBurnie5.6(5)
  • Strand Larsen5.0(3)

Away

  • McBurnie2.0(4)
  • Strand Larsen1.5(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: McBurnie 2.0 points per game, Strand Larsen 1.5 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

  • Strand Larsen22%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 9 CRY goals

McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 22% for Strand Larsen.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

  • Strand Larsen0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • McBurnie150.4
  • Strand Larsen78.4

Creativity

  • McBurnie104.4
  • Strand Larsen38.0

Threat

  • McBurnie156.0
  • Strand Larsen109.0

FPL's season ICT scores. McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Strand Larsen's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.6k in
  • Strand Larsen−3.0k3.1k out80 in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th), Strand Larsen 3.5 points per £m (17th). Median 2.3.
  • McBurnie
  • Strand Larsen

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Strand Larsen 17.

How far ahead is McBurnie? Above zero McBurnie leads; below, Strand Larsen.

McBurnie is 11 points ahead of Strand Larsen over these gameweeks. McBurnie's biggest lead was 11 (GW 9); Strand Larsen's was 9 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 4: 8 points v IPS home, 83 minutes
  2. GW 5

    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 5: 2 points v LEE away, 81 minutes
  3. GW 6

    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 6: 5 points v NFO home, 82 minutes
  4. GW 7

    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 7: 2 points v BHA away, 60 minutes
  5. GW 8

    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes
  6. GW 9

    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes

McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Strand Larsen: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
448
512
615
722
880
9120

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
48183
59081
69082
79060
8850
9900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
40.330.09
50.360.04
60.000.98
70.000.00
80.790.00
90.200.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
40.040.02
50.020.17
60.090.33
70.000.00
80.010.00
90.010.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
40.370.11
50.380.21
60.091.31
70.000.00
80.800.00
90.210.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
432
563
657
732
830
950

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
401
500
600
700
810
910

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
410
500
601
700
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
41.9%0.7%
52.0%0.6%
61.9%0.7%
71.8%0.7%
81.6%0.6%
91.7%0.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
4£5.5m£6.0m
5£5.5m£6.0m
6£5.5m£6.0m
7£5.5m£6.0m
8£5.5m£6.0m
9£5.5m£6.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMcBurnieStrand Larsen
4——
50.4%0.2%
60.3%0.2%
70.2%0.1%
80.2%0.1%
90.6%0.0%