How do McBurnie and Solanke compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 21), McBurnie is more owned (1.7% vs 1.5%), McBurnie is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.8m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 1), but Solanke has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

McBurnie

23 stats won

Solanke

6 stats won

Who wins more stats: McBurnie or Solanke?

McBurnie wins 23 of 29 stats

McBurnie wins 23 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Solanke 6.

Points
McBurnie: 36Solanke: 21
xGI (6 gw)
McBurnie: 0.31Solanke: 0.27
Price
McBurnie: £5.5mSolanke: £5.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMcBurnieSolanke
Price & ownership12
Playing time40
Recent form42
Season totals50
Set pieces10
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total236

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60. Solanke: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.27, BPS 78, Mins (6 gw) 66, xG (6 gw) 0.24, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Solanke leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Price

5.5m−0.3m vs best

5.8m(best)

Ownership

1.7%(best)

1.5%−0.2% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.6%−0.5% vs best

1.1%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Starts

9(best)

5−4 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

56%−44% vs best

Minutes (season)

796(best)

440−356 vs best

Avg minutes

88(best)

49−39 vs best

Who has better recent form?

McBurnie leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Mins (6 gw)

88(best)

66−22 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.28(best)

0.24−0.04 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.03(best)

0.02−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.31(best)

0.27−0.04 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.17−1.33 vs best

5.50(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.33+0.75 vs best

0.58(best)

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Points

36(best)

21−15 vs best

Goals

2(best)

1−1 vs best

Assists

3(best)

1−2 vs best

Total xG

2.22(best)

1.90−0.32 vs best

Total xA

0.24(best)

0.14−0.10 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties

1st choice

1st choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
BPS

133(best)

78−55 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

17.2(best)

11.7−5.5 vs best

Bonus

5(best)

1−4 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.8(best)

0.2−0.6 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Solanke leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Next 5 GWs

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.60+0.80 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMcBurnieSolanke
Form

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

3.5

11th FWD · 84th overall

ICT index

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

28.2

18th FWD · 128th overall

Selected

20th FWD(best)

135th overall

22nd FWD

143rd overall

Points per game

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

2.3

24th FWD · 232nd overall

Cost rank

33rd FWD

125th overall

25th FWD(best)

96th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance
  • SolankeTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Solanke (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)
  • Solanke−0.9Solanke: 1 goals from 1.90 xG (−0.9)

Solanke has 0.9 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)
  • Solanke+0.9Solanke: 1 assists from 0.14 xA (+0.9)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Solanke · 21 pts64% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceMcBurnieSolanke
Appearances1814
Goals84
Assists93
Bonus51
Deductions−4−1
Total3621

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • McBurnie6.5(2)
  • Solanke2.3(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • McBurnie3.2(6)
  • Solanke3.0(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • McBurnie4.0(1)
  • Solanke1.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Solanke 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • McBurnie5.6(5)
  • Solanke2.2(5)

Away

  • McBurnie2.0(4)
  • Solanke2.5(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Solanke 2.5 points per game, McBurnie 2.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

  • Solanke20%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 10 TOT goals

McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 20% for Solanke.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

  • Solanke2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • McBurnie150.4
  • Solanke88.8

Creativity

  • McBurnie104.4
  • Solanke54.8

Threat

  • McBurnie156.0
  • Solanke140.0

FPL's season ICT scores. McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Solanke's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.6k in
  • Solanke−4.9k8.4k out3.6k in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th), Solanke 3.6 points per £m (16th). Median 2.3.
  • McBurnie
  • Solanke

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Solanke 18.

How far ahead is McBurnie? Above zero McBurnie leads; below, Solanke.

McBurnie is 10 points ahead of Solanke over these gameweeks. McBurnie's biggest lead was 10 (GW 9); Solanke's was 7 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes
    Solanke, gameweek 4: 2 points v EVE home, 62 minutes
  2. GW 5

    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes
    Solanke, gameweek 5: 2 points v AVL home, 65 minutes
  3. GW 6

    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
    Solanke, gameweek 6: 7 points v MUN away, 90 minutes
  4. GW 7

    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
    Solanke, gameweek 7: 4 points v COV home, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
    Solanke, gameweek 8: 1 points v CHE away, 25 minutes
  6. GW 9

    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
    Solanke, gameweek 9: 2 points v CRY home, 65 minutes

McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Solanke: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
442
512
617
724
881
9122

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
48162
59065
69090
79090
88525
99065

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
40.330.00
50.360.12
60.000.67
70.000.31
80.790.00
90.200.36

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
40.040.01
50.020.00
60.090.06
70.000.01
80.010.03
90.010.03

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
40.370.01
50.380.12
60.090.73
70.000.32
80.800.03
90.210.39

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
432
566
654
739
834
958

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
400
500
601
700
810
910

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
410
500
600
701
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
41.9%0.9%
52.0%0.8%
61.9%0.8%
71.8%1.6%
81.6%1.5%
91.7%1.6%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
4£5.5m£5.9m
5£5.5m£5.8m
6£5.5m£5.8m
7£5.5m£5.8m
8£5.5m£5.8m
9£5.5m£5.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMcBurnieSolanke
4——
50.4%0.0%
60.3%0.0%
70.2%1.9%
80.2%1.5%
90.6%1.1%