How do Mamardashvili and Verbruggen compare?
Verbruggen has more season points (51 vs 0), Verbruggen is more owned (23.1% vs 0.1%), Verbruggen is cheaper (4.6m vs 4.8m), Verbruggen has the higher Start rate (100% vs 0%), but Verbruggen has more Bonus (5 vs 0).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Verbruggen wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Mamardashvili or Verbruggen?
Verbruggen wins 19 of 22 stats
Verbruggen wins 19 of the 22 stats with an outright best. Others: Mamardashvili 3.
- Points
- Mamardashvili: 0Verbruggen: 51
- Saves
- Mamardashvili: 0Verbruggen: 26
- Price
- Mamardashvili: £4.8mVerbruggen: £4.6m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 2 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 1 | 1 |
| Season totals | 0 | 4 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 0 | 4 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 1 | 4 |
| Total | 3 | 19 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Verbruggen leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.8m(best) | 4.6m−0.2m vs best |
| Ownership | 0.1%−23.0% vs best | 23.1%(best) |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.0%−30.9% vs best | 30.9%(best) |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Verbruggen leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0−9 vs best | 9(best) |
| Start rate | 0%−100% vs best | 100%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 0−810 vs best | 810(best) |
| Avg minutes | 0−90 vs best | 90(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 0−90 vs best | 90(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.00(best) | 1.21+1.21 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Verbruggen leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0−51 vs best | 51(best) |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.00−0.21 vs best | 0.21(best) |
| Clean sheets | 0−6 vs best | 6(best) |
| Saves | 0−26 vs best | 26(best) |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Verbruggen leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 0−214 vs best | 214(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 0.0−28.8 vs best | 28.8(best) |
| Bonus | 0−5 vs best | 5(best) |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0−0.8 vs best | 0.8(best) |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14 | BRE (H) 10 HUL (A) 11 NEW (H) 12 BOU (A) 13 NFO (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Verbruggen leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 0.0 67th GK · 555th overall | 7.0(best) 1st GK · 8th overall |
| ICT index | 0.0 68th GK · 592nd overall | 24.2(best) 3rd GK · 149th overall |
| Selected | 44th GK 379th overall | 2nd GK(best) 14th overall |
| Points per game | 0.0 68th GK · 593rd overall | 5.7(best) 2nd GK · 21st overall |
| Cost rank | 20th GK(best) 398th overall | 23rd GK 428th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
MamardashviliLIV
- LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
- LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
VerbruggenBHA
- BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Mamardashvili (LIV) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Verbruggen (BHA) 0.7 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Mamardashvili±0.0Mamardashvili: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
- Verbruggen−6.0Verbruggen: 7 conceded from 13.00 xGC (−6.0)
Verbruggen has conceded 6.0 fewer than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Mamardashvili · 0 pts
Verbruggen · 51 pts44% from clean sheets
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 0 | 18 |
| Clean sheets | 0 | 24 |
| Saves | 0 | 8 |
| Bonus | 0 | 5 |
| Deductions | 0 | −4 |
| Total | 0 | 51 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- MamardashviliNo games
- Verbruggen7.0(2)
Medium (FDR 3)
- MamardashviliNo games
- Verbruggen6.0(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- MamardashviliNo games
- Verbruggen4.8(4)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- MamardashviliNo games
- Verbruggen5.3(4)
Away
- MamardashviliNo games
- Verbruggen6.0(5)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Mamardashvili
No LIV goals yet in matches played
Verbruggen0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 24 BHA goals
Who is a rotation risk?
Mamardashvili0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Verbruggen9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Mamardashvili0.0
- Verbruggen238.6
Creativity
- Mamardashvili0.0
- Verbruggen3.0
Threat
- Mamardashvili0.0
- Verbruggen0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Mamardashvili's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Verbruggen's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Mamardashvili−39229 out190 in
- Verbruggen+68.6k7.5k out76.1k in
Verbruggen has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+68.6k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Mamardashvili
- Verbruggen
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Mamardashvili, gameweek 4: 0 points v FUL home, 0 minutesVerbruggen, gameweek 4: 8 points v COV away, 90 minutesGW 5
Mamardashvili, gameweek 5: 0 points v BOU away, 0 minutesVerbruggen, gameweek 5: 6 points v ARS home, 90 minutesGW 6
Mamardashvili, gameweek 6: 0 points v MCI home, 0 minutesVerbruggen, gameweek 6: 9 points v SUN away, 90 minutesGW 7
Mamardashvili, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutesVerbruggen, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutesGW 8
Mamardashvili, gameweek 8: 0 points v BHA home, 0 minutesVerbruggen, gameweek 8: 2 points v LIV away, 90 minutesGW 9
Mamardashvili, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutesVerbruggen, gameweek 9: 11 points v MCI away, 90 minutes
Mamardashvili: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Verbruggen: 1 haul (10+), 1 blank (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 8 | 0 | 2 |
| 9 | 0 | 11 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 90 |
| 5 | 0 | 90 |
| 6 | 0 | 90 |
| 7 | 0 | 90 |
| 8 | 0 | 90 |
| 9 | 0 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.1% | 22.4% |
| 5 | 0.1% | 21.2% |
| 6 | 0.1% | 21.2% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 22.5% |
| 8 | 0.1% | 22.7% |
| 9 | 0.1% | 21.8% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.9m | £4.5m |
| 5 | £4.9m | £4.5m |
| 6 | £4.8m | £4.5m |
| 7 | £4.8m | £4.6m |
| 8 | £4.8m | £4.6m |
| 9 | £4.8m | £4.6m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Mamardashvili | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | — | 39.4% |
| 6 | — | 51.5% |
| 7 | — | 45.2% |
| 8 | — | 36.6% |
| 9 | — | 30.9% |

