How do Lammens and Mamardashvili compare?

Lammens has more season points (20 vs 0), Lammens is more owned (7.5% vs 0.1%), Lammens has the higher Start rate (100% vs 0%), but Mamardashvili has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Lammens

18 stats won

Mamardashvili

3 stats won

Who wins more stats: Lammens or Mamardashvili?

Lammens wins 18 of 21 stats

Lammens wins 18 of the 21 stats with an outright best. Others: Mamardashvili 3.

Points
Lammens: 20Mamardashvili: 0
Saves
Lammens: 30Mamardashvili: 0
Price
Lammens: £4.8mMamardashvili: £4.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionLammensMamardashvili
Price & ownership20
Playing time40
Recent form31
Season totals30
Set pieces00
Bonus20
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total183

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.

Lammens: Points 20, Saves 30, Clean sheets 0, BPS 105, Mins (6 gw) 90, xGC (6 gw) 1.82. Mamardashvili: Points 0, Saves 0, Clean sheets 0, BPS 0, Mins (6 gw) 0, xGC (6 gw) 0.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Lammens leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Price

4.8m

4.8m

Ownership

7.5%(best)

0.1%−7.4% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.3%(best)

0.0%−0.3% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Lammens leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Starts

9(best)

0−9 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

0%−100% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

0−810 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

0−90 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Lammens leads 3 of 4
Who has better recent form?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

0−90 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xA (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

DC (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.82+1.82 vs best

0.00(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Lammens leads 3 of 3
Who has scored more this season?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Points

20(best)

0−20 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.00

0.00

Total xA

0.04(best)

0.00−0.04 vs best

Clean sheets

0

0

Saves

30(best)

0−30 vs best

See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Penalties saved

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Lammens leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatLammensMamardashvili
BPS

105(best)

0−105 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

12.3(best)

0.0−12.3 vs best

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Mamardashvili leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Next 5 GWs

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

CRY

(A)

10

MUN

(H)

11

EVE

(A)

12

SUN

(H)

13

CHE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.20 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Lammens leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatLammensMamardashvili
Form

2.2(best)

16th GK · 170th overall

0.0

67th GK · 555th overall

ICT index

24.2(best)

4th GK · 150th overall

0.0

68th GK · 592nd overall

Selected

7th GK(best)

45th overall

44th GK

379th overall

Points per game

2.2(best)

20th GK · 242nd overall

0.0

68th GK · 593rd overall

Cost rank

21st GK

401st overall

20th GK(best)

398th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • LammensMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

  • MamardashviliLIV

    1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
    2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mamardashvili (LIV) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Lammens (MUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Lammens±0.0Lammens: 15 conceded from 14.99 xGC (±0.0)
  • Mamardashvili±0.0Mamardashvili: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Lammens · 20 pts64% from appearances

    −8 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Mamardashvili · 0 pts

Season points by source
SourceLammensMamardashvili
Appearances180
Saves100
Deductions−80
Total200

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Lammens1.5(2)
  • MamardashviliNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Lammens2.4(5)
  • MamardashviliNo games

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Lammens2.5(2)
  • MamardashviliNo games

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Lammens1.8(4)
  • MamardashviliNo games

Away

  • Lammens2.6(5)
  • MamardashviliNo games

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Lammens0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 10 MUN goals

  • Mamardashvili

    No LIV goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Lammens9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Mamardashvili0 of 9 full games

    9 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Lammens231.6
  • Mamardashvili0.0

Creativity

  • Lammens10.0
  • Mamardashvili0.0

Threat

  • Lammens0.0
  • Mamardashvili0.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Lammens's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Mamardashvili's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Lammens−19.9k20.7k out775 in
  • Mamardashvili−39229 out190 in

Managers are selling all of them; Mamardashvili the least (−39 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 25 goalkeepers who have played: Lammens 4.2 points per £m (17th). Median 5.4.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Lammens
  • Mamardashvili

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Lammens 15, Mamardashvili 0.

How far ahead is Lammens? Above zero Lammens leads; below, Mamardashvili.

Lammens is 15 points ahead of Mamardashvili over these gameweeks. Lammens's biggest lead was 15 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Lammens, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 90 minutes
    Mamardashvili, gameweek 4: 0 points v FUL home, 0 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Lammens, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
    Mamardashvili, gameweek 5: 0 points v BOU away, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Lammens, gameweek 6: 2 points v TOT home, 90 minutes
    Mamardashvili, gameweek 6: 0 points v MCI home, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Lammens, gameweek 7: 3 points v LEE away, 90 minutes
    Mamardashvili, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Lammens, gameweek 8: 1 points v BOU home, 90 minutes
    Mamardashvili, gameweek 8: 0 points v BHA home, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Lammens, gameweek 9: 3 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Mamardashvili, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes

Lammens: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Mamardashvili: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
420
540
620
730
810
930

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
4900
5900
6900
7900
8900
9900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.040.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.040.00
90.000.00

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
41.100.00
51.620.00
61.620.00
71.410.00
82.150.00
93.010.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
411.0%0.1%
510.2%0.1%
69.4%0.1%
78.8%0.1%
88.4%0.1%
97.6%0.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
4£5.0m£4.9m
5£4.9m£4.9m
6£4.9m£4.8m
7£4.9m£4.8m
8£4.9m£4.8m
9£4.8m£4.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWLammensMamardashvili
4——
53.7%—
62.0%—
71.4%—
80.8%—
90.3%—