How do Leno and Penders compare?
Leno has more season points (36 vs 7), Leno is more owned (4.4% vs 0.3%), Penders is cheaper (4.4m vs 4.5m), Leno has the higher Start rate (100% vs 22%), Leno has more Bonus (4 vs 0), but Penders has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.40).
Who wins more stats: Leno or Penders?
Leno wins 20 of 22 stats
Leno wins 20 of the 22 stats with an outright best. Others: Penders 2.
- Points
- Leno: 36Penders: 7
- Saves
- Leno: 23Penders: 7
- Price
- Leno: £4.5mPenders: £4.4m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 3 | 0 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 1 | 1 |
| Season totals | 3 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 4 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 1 |
| FPL ranks | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 2 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Leno leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.5m(best) | 4.4m−0.1m vs best |
| Ownership | 4.4%(best) | 0.3%−4.1% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 2.5%(best) | 0.4%−2.1% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Leno leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9(best) | 2−7 vs best |
| Start rate | 100%(best) | 22%−78% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 810(best) | 195−615 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 90(best) | 22−68 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90(best) | 33−57 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.09+0.74 vs best | 0.35(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Leno leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 36(best) | 7−29 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Clean sheets | 3(best) | 1−2 vs best |
| Saves | 23(best) | 7−16 vs best |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Leno leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 160(best) | 31−129 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 21.7(best) | 5.2−16.5 vs best |
| Bonus | 4(best) | 0−4 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.7(best) | 0.0−0.7 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Penders leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | NEW (H) 10 MCI (A) 11 BOU (H) 12 TOT (A) 13 EVE (A) 14 | SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.40+0.60 vs best | 2.80(best) |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Leno leads 5 of 5
| Stat | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 4.5(best) 5th GK · 48th overall | 1.8 19th GK · 203rd overall |
| ICT index | 20.1(best) 9th GK · 190th overall | 3.6 23rd GK · 377th overall |
| Selected | 11th GK(best) 79th overall | 39th GK 291st overall |
| Points per game | 4.0(best) 7th GK · 89th overall | 2.3 18th GK · 227th overall |
| Cost rank | 26th GK(best) 432nd overall | 47th GK 549th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
LenoFUL
- FUL v NEW home, gameweek 10: 1.54 projected goals, 33% clean sheet chance
- FUL v MCI away, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 12% clean sheet chance
PendersCHE
- CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
- CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Penders (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Leno (FUL) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Leno−1.8Leno: 11 conceded from 12.76 xGC (−1.8)
- Penders−0.1Penders: 2 conceded from 2.10 xGC (−0.1)
Leno has conceded 1.8 fewer than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Leno · 36 pts44% from appearances
−5 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Penders · 7 pts45% from appearances
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 5 |
| Clean sheets | 12 | 4 |
| Saves | 7 | 2 |
| Bonus | 4 | 0 |
| Deductions | −5 | −4 |
| Total | 36 | 7 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Leno4.3(4)
- PendersNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Leno2.7(3)
- Penders2.3(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Leno5.5(2)
- PendersNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Leno3.0(4)
- Penders3.0(2)
Away
- Leno4.8(5)
- Penders1.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Leno 4.8 points per game, Penders 1.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Leno0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 9 FUL goals
Penders0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 4 CHE goals
Leno is involved in 0% of FUL's goals, against 0% for Penders.
Who is a rotation risk?
Leno9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Penders2 of 9 full games
2 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 6 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Leno201.0
- Penders35.6
Creativity
- Leno0.0
- Penders0.0
Threat
- Leno0.0
- Penders0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Leno's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Penders's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Leno−2.4k5.8k out3.4k in
- Penders+4.3k865 out5.2k in
Penders has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+4.3k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Leno
- Penders
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Leno, gameweek 4: 9 points v LIV away, 90 minutesPenders, gameweek 4: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutesGW 5
Leno, gameweek 5: 3 points v MUN home, 90 minutesPenders, gameweek 5: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutesGW 6
Leno, gameweek 6: 2 points v IPS away, 90 minutesPenders, gameweek 6: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutesGW 7
Leno, gameweek 7: 6 points v HUL home, 90 minutesPenders, gameweek 7: 1 points v EVE away, 15 minutesGW 8
Leno, gameweek 8: 8 points v COV away, 90 minutesPenders, gameweek 8: 0 points v TOT home, 90 minutesGW 9
Leno, gameweek 9: 2 points v AVL away, 90 minutesPenders, gameweek 9: 6 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
Leno: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Penders: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 9 | 0 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 |
| 6 | 2 | 0 |
| 7 | 6 | 1 |
| 8 | 8 | 0 |
| 9 | 2 | 6 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 0 |
| 5 | 90 | 0 |
| 6 | 90 | 0 |
| 7 | 90 | 15 |
| 8 | 90 | 90 |
| 9 | 90 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1.60 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| 8 | 0.51 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 1.83 | 1.24 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.9% | 0.1% |
| 5 | 3.1% | 0.1% |
| 6 | 4.1% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 4.2% | 0.1% |
| 8 | 4.5% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 4.4% | 0.3% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.5m | £4.4m |
| 5 | £4.5m | £4.4m |
| 6 | £4.5m | £4.4m |
| 7 | £4.5m | £4.4m |
| 8 | £4.5m | £4.4m |
| 9 | £4.5m | £4.4m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Leno | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 2.5% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 4.0% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 2.5% | 0.4% |

