How do Lammens and Suzuki compare?

Suzuki has more season points (31 vs 20), Lammens is more owned (7.5% vs 3.1%), Lammens is cheaper (4.8m vs 5.0m), Lammens has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), Suzuki has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Suzuki has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Lammens

10 stats won

Suzuki

13 stats won

Who wins more stats: Lammens or Suzuki?

Suzuki wins 13 of 23 stats

Suzuki wins 13 of the 23 stats with an outright best. Others: Lammens 10.

Points
Lammens: 20Suzuki: 31
Saves
Lammens: 30Suzuki: 29
Price
Lammens: £4.8mSuzuki: £5.0m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionLammensSuzuki
Price & ownership12
Playing time40
Recent form21
Season totals22
Set pieces00
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks13
Total1013

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.

Lammens: Points 20, Saves 30, Clean sheets 0, BPS 105, Mins (6 gw) 90, xGC (6 gw) 1.82. Suzuki: Points 31, Saves 29, Clean sheets 2, BPS 163, Mins (6 gw) 90, xGC (6 gw) 1.62.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Suzuki leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatLammensSuzuki
Price

4.8m−0.2m vs best

5.0m(best)

Ownership

7.5%(best)

3.1%−4.4% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.3%−8.2% vs best

8.5%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Lammens leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatLammensSuzuki
Starts

9(best)

8−1 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

89%−11% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

720−90 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

80−10 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Lammens leads 2 of 3
Who has better recent form?
StatLammensSuzuki
Mins (6 gw)

90

90

xG (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xA (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

DC (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.82+0.20 vs best

1.62(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Split
Who has scored more this season?
StatLammensSuzuki
Points

20−11 vs best

31(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.00

0.00

Total xA

0.04(best)

0.01−0.03 vs best

Clean sheets

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Saves

30(best)

29−1 vs best

See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatLammensSuzuki
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Penalties saved

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Suzuki leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatLammensSuzuki
BPS

105−58 vs best

163(best)

BPS (6 gw)

12.3−7.2 vs best

19.5(best)

Bonus

0−5 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.3 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Suzuki leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatLammensSuzuki
Next 5 GWs

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.60 vs best

2.40(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Suzuki leads 3 of 4
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatLammensSuzuki
Form

2.2

16th GK · 170th overall

3.8(best)

7th GK · 73rd overall

ICT index

24.2

4th GK · 150th overall

24.2

5th GK · 151st overall

Selected

7th GK(best)

45th overall

18th GK

104th overall

Points per game

2.2

20th GK · 242nd overall

3.9(best)

9th GK · 97th overall

Cost rank

21st GK

401st overall

9th GK(best)

276th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • LammensMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

  • SuzukiAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Suzuki (AVL) 0.6 expected clean sheets, Lammens (MUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Lammens±0.0Lammens: 15 conceded from 14.99 xGC (±0.0)
  • Suzuki−2.3Suzuki: 9 conceded from 11.30 xGC (−2.3)

Suzuki has conceded 2.3 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Lammens · 20 pts64% from appearances

    −8 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Suzuki · 31 pts42% from appearances

    −7 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceLammensSuzuki
Appearances1816
Clean sheets08
Saves109
Bonus05
Deductions−8−7
Total2031

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Lammens1.5(2)
  • Suzuki5.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Lammens2.4(5)
  • Suzuki3.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Lammens2.5(2)
  • Suzuki3.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Suzuki 3.0 points per game, Lammens 2.5 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Lammens1.8(4)
  • Suzuki2.2(5)

Away

  • Lammens2.6(5)
  • Suzuki6.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Suzuki 6.7 points per game, Lammens 2.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Lammens0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 10 MUN goals

  • Suzuki0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 10 AVL goals

Lammens is involved in 0% of MUN's goals, against 0% for Suzuki.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Lammens9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Suzuki8 of 9 full games

    8 × 90 minutes, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Lammens231.6
  • Suzuki241.2

Creativity

  • Lammens10.0
  • Suzuki0.0

Threat

  • Lammens0.0
  • Suzuki0.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Lammens's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Suzuki's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Lammens−19.9k20.6k out771 in
  • Suzuki+3.8k8.3k out12.1k in

Suzuki has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+3.8k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 25 goalkeepers who have played: Lammens 4.2 points per £m (17th), Suzuki 6.2 points per £m (11th). Median 5.4.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Lammens
  • Suzuki

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Suzuki 19, Lammens 15.

How far ahead is Lammens? Above zero Lammens leads; below, Suzuki.

Suzuki is 4 points ahead of Lammens over these gameweeks. Lammens's biggest lead was 2 (GW 5); Suzuki's was 6 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Lammens, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 90 minutes
    Suzuki, gameweek 4: 2 points v NFO home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Lammens, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
    Suzuki, gameweek 5: 2 points v TOT away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Lammens, gameweek 6: 2 points v TOT home, 90 minutes
    Suzuki, gameweek 6: 2 points v BRE home, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Lammens, gameweek 7: 3 points v LEE away, 90 minutes
    Suzuki, gameweek 7: 8 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Lammens, gameweek 8: 1 points v BOU home, 90 minutes
    Suzuki, gameweek 8: 4 points v MCI home, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Lammens, gameweek 9: 3 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Suzuki, gameweek 9: 1 points v FUL home, 90 minutes

Lammens: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Suzuki: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
422
542
622
738
814
931

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
49090
59090
69090
79090
89090
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
40.000.01
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.040.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
40.000.01
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.040.00
90.000.00

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
41.102.28
51.621.56
61.621.06
71.410.99
82.151.56
93.012.24

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
411.0%1.9%
510.2%1.8%
69.4%2.0%
78.8%1.9%
88.4%2.1%
97.6%4.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
4£5.0m£5.0m
5£4.9m£5.0m
6£4.9m£5.0m
7£4.9m£5.0m
8£4.9m£5.0m
9£4.8m£5.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWLammensSuzuki
4——
53.7%0.4%
62.0%0.4%
71.4%0.4%
80.8%0.5%
90.3%8.5%