How do Lammens and Pope compare?
Lammens has more season points (20 vs 0), Lammens is more owned (7.5% vs 0.9%), Lammens is cheaper (4.8m vs 4.9m), Lammens has the higher Start rate (100% vs 0%), but Lammens has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.20).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Lammens wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Lammens or Pope?
Lammens wins 19 of 22 stats
Lammens wins 19 of the 22 stats with an outright best. Others: Pope 3.
- Points
- Lammens: 20Pope: 0
- Saves
- Lammens: 30Pope: 0
- Price
- Lammens: £4.8mPope: £4.9m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 3 | 1 |
| Season totals | 3 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 2 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 19 | 3 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Lammens leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.8m−0.1m vs best | 4.9m(best) |
| Ownership | 7.5%(best) | 0.9%−6.6% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.3%(best) | 0.0%−0.3% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Lammens leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9(best) | 0−9 vs best |
| Start rate | 100%(best) | 0%−100% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 810(best) | 0−810 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 90(best) | 0−90 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Lammens leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90(best) | 0−90 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.82+1.82 vs best | 0.00(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Lammens leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 20(best) | 0−20 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.04(best) | 0.00−0.04 vs best |
| Clean sheets | 0 | 0 |
| Saves | 30(best) | 0−30 vs best |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Lammens leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 105(best) | 0−105 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 12.3(best) | 0.0−12.3 vs best |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Lammens leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | AVL (H) 10 LIV (A) 11 BRE (H) 12 NEW (A) 13 COV (H) 14 | FUL (A) 10 ARS (H) 11 BHA (A) 12 MUN (H) 13 SUN (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.00(best) | 3.20+0.20 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Lammens leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 2.2(best) 16th GK · 170th overall | 0.0 68th GK · 561st overall |
| ICT index | 24.2(best) 4th GK · 150th overall | 0.0 69th GK · 594th overall |
| Selected | 7th GK(best) 45th overall | 30th GK 194th overall |
| Points per game | 2.2(best) 20th GK · 242nd overall | 0.0 69th GK · 594th overall |
| Cost rank | 21st GK 401st overall | 12th GK(best) 323rd overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
LammensMUN
- MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
- MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance
PopeNEW
- NEW v FUL away, gameweek 10: 1.12 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- NEW v ARS home, gameweek 11: 0.89 projected goals, 17% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Lammens (MUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets, Pope (NEW) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Lammens±0.0Lammens: 15 conceded from 14.99 xGC (±0.0)
- Pope±0.0Pope: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Lammens · 20 pts64% from appearances
−8 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Pope · 0 pts
| Source | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 0 |
| Saves | 10 | 0 |
| Deductions | −8 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Lammens1.5(2)
- PopeNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Lammens2.4(5)
- PopeNo games
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Lammens2.5(2)
- PopeNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Lammens1.8(4)
- PopeNo games
Away
- Lammens2.6(5)
- PopeNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Lammens0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 10 MUN goals
Pope
No NEW goals yet in matches played
Who is a rotation risk?
Lammens9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Pope0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Lammens231.6
- Pope0.0
Creativity
- Lammens10.0
- Pope0.0
Threat
- Lammens0.0
- Pope0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Lammens's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Pope's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Lammens−19.9k20.7k out773 in
- Pope−616898 out282 in
Managers are selling all of them; Pope the least (−616 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Lammens
- Pope
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Lammens, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 90 minutesPope, gameweek 4: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutesGW 5
Lammens, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutesPope, gameweek 5: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutesGW 6
Lammens, gameweek 6: 2 points v TOT home, 90 minutesPope, gameweek 6: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutesGW 7
Lammens, gameweek 7: 3 points v LEE away, 90 minutesPope, gameweek 7: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutesGW 8
Lammens, gameweek 8: 1 points v BOU home, 90 minutesPope, gameweek 8: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutesGW 9
Lammens, gameweek 9: 3 points v CHE away, 90 minutesPope, gameweek 9: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes
Lammens: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Pope: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | 4 | 0 |
| 6 | 2 | 0 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | 3 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 0 |
| 5 | 90 | 0 |
| 6 | 90 | 0 |
| 7 | 90 | 0 |
| 8 | 90 | 0 |
| 9 | 90 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1.62 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 1.62 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 1.41 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 2.15 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 3.01 | 0.00 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 11.0% | 1.0% |
| 5 | 10.2% | 1.0% |
| 6 | 9.4% | 0.9% |
| 7 | 8.8% | 0.9% |
| 8 | 8.4% | 0.9% |
| 9 | 7.6% | 0.9% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £4.9m |
| 5 | £4.9m | £4.9m |
| 6 | £4.9m | £4.9m |
| 7 | £4.9m | £4.9m |
| 8 | £4.9m | £4.9m |
| 9 | £4.8m | £4.9m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Lammens | Pope |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 1.4% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 0.3% | 0.0% |

