How do Kulusevski and Neto compare?

Neto has more season points (40 vs 3), Neto is more owned (5% vs 0%), Kulusevski is cheaper (6.5m vs 6.6m), Neto has the higher Start rate (89% vs 0%), but Neto has more Bonus (3 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Kulusevski

1 stats won

Neto

29 stats won

Who wins more stats: Kulusevski or Neto?

Neto wins 29 of 30 stats

Neto wins 29 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Kulusevski 1.

Points
Kulusevski: 3Neto: 40
xGI (6 gw)
Kulusevski: 0.01Neto: 0.31
Price
Kulusevski: £6.5mNeto: £6.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionKulusevskiNeto
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals06
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks05
Total129

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Kulusevski: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.01, BPS 17, Mins (6 gw) 3, DC (6 gw) 0.7, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Neto: Points 40, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 185, Mins (6 gw) 86, DC (6 gw) 7.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Neto leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Price

6.5m−0.1m vs best

6.6m(best)

Ownership

0%−5% vs best

5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−1.1% vs best

1.1%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Neto leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Starts

0−8 vs best

8(best)

Start rate

0%−89% vs best

89%(best)

Minutes (season)

17−660 vs best

677(best)

Avg minutes

2−73 vs best

75(best)

Who has better recent form?

Neto leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Mins (6 gw)

3−83 vs best

86(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.01−0.21 vs best

0.22(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.09 vs best

0.09(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.01−0.30 vs best

0.31(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.67−6.33 vs best

7.00(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.03(best)

1.13+1.10 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Neto leads 6 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Points

3−37 vs best

40(best)

Goals

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.05−1.74 vs best

1.79(best)

Total xA

0.01−0.97 vs best

0.98(best)

DC (season)

4−53 vs best

57(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Neto leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Corners & indirect FKs

—

2nd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

5th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Neto leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatKulusevskiNeto
BPS

17−168 vs best

185(best)

BPS (6 gw)

2.8−19.5 vs best

22.3(best)

Bonus

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.5 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80

2.80

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Neto leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatKulusevskiNeto
Form

0.8

156th MID · 324th overall

6.5(best)

3rd MID · 13th overall

ICT index

4.0

176th MID · 371st overall

65.7(best)

9th MID · 11th overall

Selected

197th MID

496th overall

25th MID(best)

71st overall

Points per game

1.0

211th MID · 431st overall

4.4(best)

24th MID · 60th overall

Cost rank

28th MID

40th overall

24th MID(best)

36th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • KulusevskiTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • NetoCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Neto (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals, Kulusevski (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Kulusevski−0.1Kulusevski: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)
  • Neto+1.2Neto: 3 goals from 1.79 xG (+1.2)

Neto has 1.2 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Kulusevski±0.0Kulusevski: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)
  • Neto±0.0Neto: 1 assists from 0.98 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Kulusevski · 3 pts100% from appearances

  • Neto · 40 pts40% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceKulusevskiNeto
Appearances317
Goals015
Assists03
Clean sheets02
Defensive contribution02
Bonus03
Deductions0−2
Total340

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Kulusevski1.0(2)
  • Neto2.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • KulusevskiNo games
  • Neto5.4(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Kulusevski1.0(1)
  • Neto3.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Neto 3.7 points per game, Kulusevski 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Kulusevski1.0(2)
  • Neto4.0(5)

Away

  • Kulusevski1.0(1)
  • Neto5.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Neto 5.0 points per game, Kulusevski 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Kulusevski0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 7 TOT goals

  • Neto21%

    3 goals and 1 assist of 19 CHE goals

Neto is involved in 21% of CHE's goals, against 0% for Kulusevski.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Kulusevski0 of 9 full games

    3 × 1–59, 6 × Didn't play

  • Neto1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Kulusevski9.4
  • Neto217.4

Creativity

  • Kulusevski5.4
  • Neto181.4

Threat

  • Kulusevski26.0
  • Neto258.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Kulusevski's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Neto's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Kulusevski+141388 out529 in
  • Neto+14.9k17.3k out32.3k in

Neto has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+14.9k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Kulusevski 0.5 points per £m (193rd), Neto 6.1 points per £m (22nd). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Kulusevski
  • Neto

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Neto 30, Kulusevski 3.

How far ahead is Kulusevski? Above zero Kulusevski leads; below, Neto.

Neto is 27 points ahead of Kulusevski over these gameweeks. Neto's was 27 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Kulusevski, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 4: 2 points v HUL home, 85 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Kulusevski, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 5: 2 points v BRE away, 86 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Kulusevski, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 6: 5 points v BOU home, 82 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Kulusevski, gameweek 7: 1 points v COV home, 3 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 7: 15 points v EVE away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Kulusevski, gameweek 8: 1 points v CHE away, 1 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 8: 3 points v TOT home, 87 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Kulusevski, gameweek 9: 1 points v CRY home, 13 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 9: 3 points v MUN home, 86 minutes

Kulusevski: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Neto: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
402
502
605
7115
813
913

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
4085
5086
6082
7390
8187
91386

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
40.000.05
50.000.16
60.000.16
70.000.37
80.020.16
90.030.42

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
40.000.10
50.000.05
60.000.06
70.000.24
80.000.05
90.010.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
40.000.15
50.000.21
60.000.22
70.000.61
80.020.21
90.040.47

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
407
506
606
729
8112
912

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
400
500
600
702
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
400
500
601
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
40.0%1.5%
50.0%1.4%
60.0%1.4%
70.0%1.4%
80.0%3.6%
90.1%5.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
4£6.5m£6.5m
5£6.5m£6.5m
6£6.5m£6.5m
7£6.5m£6.5m
8£6.5m£6.5m
9£6.5m£6.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWKulusevskiNeto
4——
5—0.1%
6—0.1%
7—0.2%
8—1.0%
9—1.1%