How do Kelleher and Sels compare?
Kelleher has more season points (33 vs 21), Kelleher is more owned (6.1% vs 1.4%), but Kelleher has more Bonus (1 vs 0).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Kelleher wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Kelleher or Sels?
Kelleher wins 13 of 15 stats
Kelleher wins 13 of the 15 stats with an outright best. Others: Sels 2.
- Points
- Kelleher: 33Sels: 21
- Saves
- Kelleher: 27Sels: 17
- Price
- Kelleher: £5.0mSels: £5.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 0 |
| Playing time | 0 | 0 |
| Recent form | 0 | 1 |
| Season totals | 3 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 4 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 2 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Kelleher leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.0m | 5.0m |
| Ownership | 6.1%(best) | 1.4%−4.7% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 5.7%(best) | 0.2%−5.5% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
No outright winner
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9 | 9 |
| Start rate | 100% | 100% |
| Minutes (season) | 810 | 810 |
| Avg minutes | 90 | 90 |
Who has better recent form?
Sels leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90 | 90 |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.49+0.50 vs best | 0.99(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Kelleher leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 33(best) | 21−12 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Clean sheets | 3(best) | 1−2 vs best |
| Saves | 27(best) | 17−10 vs best |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Kelleher leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 153(best) | 94−59 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 17.0(best) | 9.3−7.7 vs best |
| Bonus | 1(best) | 0−1 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.2(best) | 0.0−0.2 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BHA (A) 10 EVE (H) 11 MUN (A) 12 ARS (H) 13 MCI (H) 14 | MCI (H) 10 BOU (A) 11 CHE (H) 12 HUL (A) 13 BHA (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.60 | 3.60 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Kelleher leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 3.2(best) 9th GK · 98th overall | 1.8 20th GK · 209th overall |
| ICT index | 19.9(best) 10th GK · 191st overall | 14.8 17th GK · 244th overall |
| Selected | 10th GK(best) 61st overall | 21st GK 150th overall |
| Points per game | 3.7(best) 10th GK · 109th overall | 2.3 19th GK · 230th overall |
| Cost rank | 6th GK 257th overall | 5th GK(best) 245th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
KelleherBRE
- BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
- BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
SelsNFO
- NFO v MCI home, gameweek 10: 1.02 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance
- NFO v BOU away, gameweek 11: 0.95 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Kelleher (BRE) 0.6 expected clean sheets, Sels (NFO) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Kelleher−3.7Kelleher: 9 conceded from 12.67 xGC (−3.7)
- Sels+2.8Sels: 12 conceded from 9.24 xGC (+2.8)
Sels has conceded 2.8 more than xGC; Kelleher has conceded 3.7 fewer than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Kelleher · 33 pts45% from appearances
−7 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Sels · 21 pts67% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 18 |
| Clean sheets | 12 | 4 |
| Saves | 9 | 5 |
| Bonus | 1 | 0 |
| Deductions | −7 | −6 |
| Total | 33 | 21 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Kelleher2.0(2)
- Sels2.0(3)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Kelleher4.5(4)
- Sels3.7(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Kelleher3.7(3)
- Sels1.3(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Kelleher 3.7 points per game, Sels 1.3 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Kelleher4.8(5)
- Sels3.0(4)
Away
- Kelleher2.3(4)
- Sels1.8(5)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Kelleher 2.3 points per game, Sels 1.8 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Kelleher0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 16 BRE goals
Sels0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 6 NFO goals
Kelleher is involved in 0% of BRE's goals, against 0% for Sels.
Who is a rotation risk?
Kelleher9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Sels9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Kelleher201.2
- Sels138.6
Creativity
- Kelleher0.0
- Sels10.0
Threat
- Kelleher0.0
- Sels0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Kelleher's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Sels's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Kelleher−5.8k8.6k out2.8k in
- Sels−3.8k4.2k out425 in
Managers are selling all of them; Sels the least (−3.8k net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Kelleher
- Sels
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Kelleher, gameweek 4: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 4: 3 points v AVL away, 90 minutesGW 5
Kelleher, gameweek 5: 6 points v CHE home, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 5: 2 points v COV home, 90 minutesGW 6
Kelleher, gameweek 6: 2 points v AVL away, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 6: 2 points v CRY away, 90 minutesGW 7
Kelleher, gameweek 7: 2 points v LIV home, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 7: 2 points v ARS home, 90 minutesGW 8
Kelleher, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 8: 2 points v IPS away, 90 minutesGW 9
Kelleher, gameweek 9: 7 points v NFO home, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 9: 1 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
Kelleher: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Sels: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | 6 | 2 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 |
| 8 | 2 | 2 |
| 9 | 7 | 1 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 90 |
| 5 | 90 | 90 |
| 6 | 90 | 90 |
| 7 | 90 | 90 |
| 8 | 90 | 90 |
| 9 | 90 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.75 | 0.82 |
| 5 | 0.83 | 0.67 |
| 6 | 2.28 | 2.41 |
| 7 | 1.64 | 1.14 |
| 8 | 1.57 | 0.46 |
| 9 | 0.86 | 0.46 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6.6% | 1.4% |
| 5 | 6.0% | 1.9% |
| 6 | 6.1% | 1.5% |
| 7 | 6.0% | 1.4% |
| 8 | 6.3% | 1.5% |
| 9 | 6.4% | 1.4% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 5 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 6 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 7 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 8 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 9 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Kelleher | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 1.4% | 2.1% |
| 6 | 1.2% | 0.4% |
| 7 | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| 8 | 1.3% | 0.3% |
| 9 | 5.7% | 0.2% |

