How do Justin and van Ewijk compare?

Justin has more season points (42 vs 19), van Ewijk is more owned (7% vs 2.3%), van Ewijk is cheaper (3.9m vs 4.5m), Justin has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), Justin has more Bonus (4 vs 0), but van Ewijk has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.60 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Justin

24 stats won

van Ewijk

6 stats won

Who wins more stats: Justin or van Ewijk?

Justin wins 24 of 30 stats

Justin wins 24 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: van Ewijk 6.

Points
Justin: 42van Ewijk: 19
xGI (6 gw)
Justin: 0.23van Ewijk: 0.04
Price
Justin: £4.5mvan Ewijk: £3.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionJustinvan Ewijk
Price & ownership12
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals61
Set pieces00
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total246

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Justin: Points 42, xGI (6 gw) 0.23, BPS 155, Mins (6 gw) 87, DC (6 gw) 6.3, Upcoming FDR 3.20. van Ewijk: Points 19, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 55, Mins (6 gw) 75, DC (6 gw) 7.3, Upcoming FDR 2.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

van Ewijk leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Price

4.5m(best)

3.9m−0.6m vs best

Ownership

2.3%−5% vs best

7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

1.3%−2.3% vs best

3.6%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Justin leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Starts

9(best)

8−1 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

89%−11% vs best

Minutes (season)

791(best)

720−71 vs best

Avg minutes

88(best)

80−8 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Justin leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Mins (6 gw)

87(best)

75−12 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.05(best)

0.00−0.05 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.18(best)

0.04−0.14 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.23(best)

0.04−0.19 vs best

DC (6 gw)

6.33−1.00 vs best

7.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.96(best)

1.31+0.35 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Justin leads 6 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Points

42(best)

19−23 vs best

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.48(best)

0.01−0.47 vs best

Total xA

1.07(best)

0.48−0.59 vs best

DC (season)

68(best)

64−4 vs best

Clean sheets

3(best)

0−3 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Justin leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
BPS

155(best)

55−100 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

17.7(best)

7.2−10.5 vs best

Bonus

4(best)

0−4 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3(best)

0.0−0.3 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

van Ewijk leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

EVE

(A)

10

CRY

(H)

11

LEE

(A)

12

IPS

(H)

13

MUN

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.60 vs best

2.60(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Justin leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatJustinvan Ewijk
Form

4.0(best)

27th DEF · 64th overall

3.2

34th DEF · 91st overall

ICT index

37.6(best)

16th DEF · 67th overall

29.0

39th DEF · 124th overall

Selected

46th DEF

120th overall

17th DEF(best)

50th overall

Points per game

4.7(best)

18th DEF · 46th overall

2.4

82nd DEF · 212th overall

Cost rank

95th DEF(best)

449th overall

211th DEF

663rd overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • JustinLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

  • van EwijkCOV

    1. COV v EVE away, gameweek 10: 0.92 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
    2. COV v CRY home, gameweek 11: 1.38 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Justin (LEE) 0.5 expected clean sheets, van Ewijk (COV) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Justin+0.5Justin: 1 goals from 0.48 xG (+0.5)
  • van Ewijk±0.0van Ewijk: 0 goals from 0.01 xG (±0.0)

Justin has 0.5 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Justin−1.1Justin: 0 assists from 1.07 xA (−1.1)
  • van Ewijk+0.5van Ewijk: 1 assists from 0.48 xA (+0.5)

Justin has 1.1 fewer assists than xA; van Ewijk has 0.5 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Justin−3.3Justin: 7 conceded from 10.30 xGC (−3.3)
  • van Ewijk+3.4van Ewijk: 16 conceded from 12.60 xGC (+3.4)

van Ewijk has conceded 3.4 more than xGC; Justin has conceded 3.3 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Justin · 42 pts41% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • van Ewijk · 19 pts64% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceJustinvan Ewijk
Appearances1816
Goals60
Assists03
Clean sheets120
Defensive contribution46
Bonus40
Deductions−2−6
Total4219

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Justin9.0(2)
  • van Ewijk2.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Justin3.0(4)
  • van Ewijk3.5(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Justin4.0(3)
  • van Ewijk1.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Justin 4.0 points per game, van Ewijk 1.3 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Justin3.5(4)
  • van Ewijk2.8(5)

Away

  • Justin5.6(5)
  • van Ewijk1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Justin 5.6 points per game, van Ewijk 1.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Justin11%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 9 LEE goals

  • van Ewijk13%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 8 COV goals

van Ewijk is involved in 13% of COV's goals, against 11% for Justin.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Justin7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

  • van Ewijk8 of 9 full games

    8 × 90 minutes, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Justin195.2
  • van Ewijk142.4

Creativity

  • Justin102.0
  • van Ewijk128.6

Threat

  • Justin79.0
  • van Ewijk19.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Justin's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; van Ewijk's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Justin−7235.8k out5.0k in
  • van Ewijk−4.5k11.8k out7.3k in

Managers are selling all of them; Justin the least (−723 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Justin 9.3 points per £m (6th), van Ewijk 4.9 points per £m (61st). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Justin
  • van Ewijk

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Justin 26, van Ewijk 13.

How far ahead is Justin? Above zero Justin leads; below, van Ewijk.

Justin is 13 points ahead of van Ewijk over these gameweeks. Justin's biggest lead was 15 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Justin, gameweek 4: 2 points v NEW home, 90 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 4: 0 points v BHA home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Justin, gameweek 5: 8 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 5: 0 points v NFO away, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Justin, gameweek 6: 6 points v ARS away, 78 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 6: 6 points v NEW home, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Justin, gameweek 7: 2 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 7: 1 points v TOT away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Justin, gameweek 8: 6 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 8: 2 points v FUL home, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Justin, gameweek 9: 2 points v BOU away, 83 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 9: 4 points v SUN home, 90 minutes

Justin: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); van Ewijk: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
420
580
666
721
862
924

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
49090
5900
67890
79090
89090
98390

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
40.000.00
50.050.00
60.190.00
70.000.00
80.020.01
90.050.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
40.280.04
50.120.00
60.000.01
70.090.11
80.030.01
90.530.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
40.280.04
50.170.00
60.190.01
70.090.11
80.050.02
90.580.05

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
457
590
6614
766
867
9610

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
40.882.81
51.060.00
61.211.84
70.920.86
80.830.55
90.881.82

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
400
500
610
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
400
500
601
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
41.5%10.5%
51.5%9.4%
61.4%7.6%
72.0%7.5%
82.3%7.4%
92.4%7.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
4£4.5m£4.0m
5£4.5m£4.0m
6£4.5m£4.0m
7£4.5m£3.9m
8£4.5m£3.9m
9£4.5m£3.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWJustinvan Ewijk
4——
51.4%9.0%
61.3%6.1%
71.5%4.7%
81.9%3.3%
91.3%3.6%