How do Hinshelwood and Reijnders compare?
Hinshelwood has more season points (24 vs 0), Hinshelwood is more owned (0.6% vs 0%), Hinshelwood is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.0m), Hinshelwood has the higher Start rate (11% vs 0%), Hinshelwood has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Hinshelwood has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).
Comparing 2 midfielders
Hinshelwood wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Hinshelwood or Reijnders?
Hinshelwood wins 24 of 27 stats
Hinshelwood wins 24 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Reijnders 3.
- Points
- Hinshelwood: 24Reijnders: 0
- xGI (6 gw)
- Hinshelwood: 0.18Reijnders: 0.00
- Price
- Hinshelwood: £5.9mReijnders: £6.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 5 | 1 |
| Season totals | 5 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 3 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 3 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Hinshelwood leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.9m−0.1m vs best | 6.0m(best) |
| Ownership | 0.6%(best) | 0%−0.6% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.2%(best) | 0.0%−0.2% vs best |
| Availability | Available | 0% · Has joined Al Qadsiah permanently |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Hinshelwood leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 1(best) | 0−1 vs best |
| Start rate | 11%(best) | 0%−11% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 145(best) | 0−145 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 16(best) | 0−16 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Hinshelwood leads 5 of 6
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 14(best) | 0−14 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.18(best) | 0.00−0.18 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.18(best) | 0.00−0.18 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 1.50(best) | 0.00−1.50 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.18+0.18 vs best | 0.00(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Hinshelwood leads 5 of 5
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 24(best) | 0−24 vs best |
| Goals | 3(best) | 0−3 vs best |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 2.47(best) | 0.00−2.47 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.06(best) | 0.00−0.06 vs best |
| DC (season) | 12(best) | 0−12 vs best |
See alsoMidfielder stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Hinshelwood leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 81(best) | 0−81 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 4.5(best) | 0.0−4.5 vs best |
| Bonus | 3(best) | 0−3 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Hinshelwood leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BRE (H) 10 HUL (A) 11 NEW (H) 12 BOU (A) 13 NFO (A) 14 | NFO (A) 10 FUL (H) 11 ARS (A) 12 LEE (H) 13 BRE (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80(best) | 3.20+0.40 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Hinshelwood leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 2.0(best) 86th MID · 198th overall | 0.0 295th MID · 661st overall |
| ICT index | 23.7(best) 83rd MID · 157th overall | 0.0 297th MID · 666th overall |
| Selected | 74th MID(best) 223rd overall | 219th MID 538th overall |
| Points per game | 6.0(best) 7th MID · 16th overall | 0.0 297th MID · 666th overall |
| Cost rank | 60th MID 91st overall | 47th MID(best) 70th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
HinshelwoodBHA
- BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
ReijndersMCI
- MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
- MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Reijnders (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals, Hinshelwood (BHA) 3.6 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Hinshelwood+0.5Hinshelwood: 3 goals from 2.47 xG (+0.5)
- Reijnders±0.0Reijnders: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)
Hinshelwood has 0.5 more goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Hinshelwood−0.1Hinshelwood: 0 assists from 0.06 xA (−0.1)
- Reijnders±0.0Reijnders: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a assist of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Hinshelwood · 24 pts63% from goals
Reijnders · 0 pts
| Source | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 5 | 0 |
| Goals | 15 | 0 |
| Clean sheets | 1 | 0 |
| Bonus | 3 | 0 |
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 0 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Hinshelwood6.0(1)
- ReijndersNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Hinshelwood16.0(1)
- ReijndersNo games
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Hinshelwood1.0(2)
- ReijndersNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Hinshelwood11.0(2)
- ReijndersNo games
Away
- Hinshelwood1.0(2)
- ReijndersNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Hinshelwood30%
3 goals and 0 assists of 10 BHA goals
Reijnders
No MCI goals yet in matches played
Who is a rotation risk?
Hinshelwood0 of 9 full games
1 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play
Reijnders0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Hinshelwood110.8
- Reijnders0.0
Creativity
- Hinshelwood16.3
- Reijnders0.0
Threat
- Hinshelwood110.0
- Reijnders0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Hinshelwood's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Reijnders's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Hinshelwood−5971.7k out1.1k in
- Reijnders−1818 out0 in
Managers are selling all of them; Reijnders the least (−18 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Hinshelwood
- Reijnders
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Hinshelwood, gameweek 4: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutesReijnders, gameweek 4: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutesGW 5
Hinshelwood, gameweek 5: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutesReijnders, gameweek 5: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutesGW 6
Hinshelwood, gameweek 6: 0 points v SUN away, 0 minutesReijnders, gameweek 6: 0 points v LIV away, 0 minutesGW 7
Hinshelwood, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 19 minutesReijnders, gameweek 7: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutesGW 8
Hinshelwood, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 45 minutesReijnders, gameweek 8: 0 points v AVL away, 0 minutesGW 9
Hinshelwood, gameweek 9: 1 points v MCI away, 18 minutesReijnders, gameweek 9: 0 points v BHA home, 0 minutes
Hinshelwood: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Reijnders: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 6 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 19 | 0 |
| 8 | 45 | 0 |
| 9 | 18 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.94 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | 0 |
| 8 | 3 | 0 |
| 9 | 4 | 0 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| 5 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 0.6% | 0.0% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £6.0m | £6.0m |
| 5 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 6 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 7 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 8 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 9 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Reijnders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.3% | — |
| 6 | 0.0% | — |
| 7 | 0.1% | — |
| 8 | 0.2% | — |
| 9 | 0.2% | — |

