How do Foden and Kulusevski compare?

Foden has more season points (20 vs 3), Foden is more owned (2.5% vs 0%), Kulusevski is cheaper (6.5m vs 6.8m), Foden has the higher Start rate (44% vs 0%), Foden has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Kulusevski has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

Foden

28 stats won

Kulusevski

2 stats won

Who wins more stats: Foden or Kulusevski?

Foden wins 28 of 30 stats

Foden wins 28 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Kulusevski 2.

Points
Foden: 20Kulusevski: 3
xGI (6 gw)
Foden: 0.24Kulusevski: 0.01
Price
Foden: £6.8mKulusevski: £6.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionFodenKulusevski
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form41
Season totals60
Set pieces20
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks50
Total282

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Foden: Points 20, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 97, Mins (6 gw) 26, DC (6 gw) 0.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Kulusevski: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.01, BPS 17, Mins (6 gw) 3, DC (6 gw) 0.7, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Foden leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatFodenKulusevski
Price

6.8m(best)

6.5m−0.3m vs best

Ownership

2.5%(best)

0%−2.5% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.8%(best)

0.0%−0.8% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Foden leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatFodenKulusevski
Starts

4(best)

0−4 vs best

Start rate

44%(best)

0%−44% vs best

Minutes (season)

349(best)

17−332 vs best

Avg minutes

39(best)

2−37 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Foden leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatFodenKulusevski
Mins (6 gw)

26(best)

3−23 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.11(best)

0.01−0.10 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.13(best)

0.00−0.13 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.24(best)

0.01−0.23 vs best

DC (6 gw)

0.67

0.67

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.24+0.21 vs best

0.03(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Foden leads 6 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatFodenKulusevski
Points

20(best)

3−17 vs best

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

2.27(best)

0.05−2.22 vs best

Total xA

1.63(best)

0.01−1.62 vs best

DC (season)

18(best)

4−14 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Foden leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatFodenKulusevski
Corners & indirect FKs

2nd choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Foden leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatFodenKulusevski
BPS

97(best)

17−80 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

6.8(best)

2.8−4.0 vs best

Bonus

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3(best)

0.0−0.3 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Kulusevski leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatFodenKulusevski
Next 5 GWs

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.40 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Foden leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatFodenKulusevski
Form

2.8(best)

58th MID · 138th overall

0.8

156th MID · 324th overall

ICT index

39.5(best)

38th MID · 62nd overall

4.0

176th MID · 371st overall

Selected

38th MID(best)

116th overall

197th MID

496th overall

Points per game

2.9(best)

78th MID · 180th overall

1.0

211th MID · 431st overall

Cost rank

18th MID(best)

30th overall

28th MID

40th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • FodenMCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
  • KulusevskiTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Foden (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals, Kulusevski (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Foden−1.3Foden: 1 goals from 2.27 xG (−1.3)
  • Kulusevski−0.1Kulusevski: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)

Foden has 1.3 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Foden+0.4Foden: 2 assists from 1.63 xA (+0.4)
  • Kulusevski±0.0Kulusevski: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Foden · 20 pts42% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Kulusevski · 3 pts100% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceFodenKulusevski
Appearances103
Goals50
Assists60
Bonus30
Deductions−40
Total203

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Foden6.3(3)
  • Kulusevski1.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Foden0.0(3)
  • KulusevskiNo games

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Foden1.0(1)
  • Kulusevski1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Foden 1.0 points per game, Kulusevski 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Foden3.0(4)
  • Kulusevski1.0(2)

Away

  • Foden2.7(3)
  • Kulusevski1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Foden 2.7 points per game, Kulusevski 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Foden25%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 12 MCI goals

  • Kulusevski0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 7 TOT goals

Foden is involved in 25% of MCI's goals, against 0% for Kulusevski.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Foden1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

  • Kulusevski0 of 9 full games

    3 × 1–59, 6 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Foden106.0
  • Kulusevski9.4

Creativity

  • Foden206.6
  • Kulusevski5.4

Threat

  • Foden84.0
  • Kulusevski26.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Foden's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Kulusevski's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Foden−12.2k15.4k out3.2k in
  • Kulusevski+140386 out526 in

Kulusevski has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+140).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Foden 2.9 points per £m (100th), Kulusevski 0.5 points per £m (193rd). Median 2.5.
  • Foden
  • Kulusevski

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Foden 9, Kulusevski 3.

How far ahead is Foden? Above zero Foden leads; below, Kulusevski.

Foden is 6 points ahead of Kulusevski over these gameweeks. Foden's biggest lead was 6 (GW 7); Kulusevski's was 2 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Foden, gameweek 4: -2 points v MUN away, 22 minutes
    Kulusevski, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Foden, gameweek 5: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutes
    Kulusevski, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Foden, gameweek 6: 0 points v LIV away, 0 minutes
    Kulusevski, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Foden, gameweek 7: 9 points v IPS home, 76 minutes
    Kulusevski, gameweek 7: 1 points v COV home, 3 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Foden, gameweek 8: 1 points v AVL away, 45 minutes
    Kulusevski, gameweek 8: 1 points v CHE away, 1 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Foden, gameweek 9: 1 points v BHA home, 11 minutes
    Kulusevski, gameweek 9: 1 points v CRY home, 13 minutes

Foden: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Kulusevski: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
4-20
500
600
791
811
911

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
4220
500
600
7763
8451
91113

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.620.00
80.040.02
90.000.03

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
40.020.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.540.00
80.170.00
90.040.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
40.020.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
71.160.00
80.210.02
90.040.04

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
400
500
600
732
811
901

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
400
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
43.7%0.0%
51.9%0.0%
61.5%0.0%
71.5%0.0%
82.7%0.0%
92.6%0.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
4£7.0m£6.5m
5£6.9m£6.5m
6£6.9m£6.5m
7£6.8m£6.5m
8£6.8m£6.5m
9£6.8m£6.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWFodenKulusevski
4——
50.4%—
60.2%—
70.8%—
81.7%—
90.8%—