How do Foden and Neto compare?

Neto has more season points (40 vs 20), Neto is more owned (5% vs 2.5%), Neto is cheaper (6.6m vs 6.8m), Neto has the higher Start rate (89% vs 44%), but Neto has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Neto wins most stats

Man City

MCI · 6.8m

8 stats won

Chelsea

CHE · 6.6m

21 stats won

Who wins more stats: Foden or Neto?

Neto wins 21 of 29 stats

Neto wins 21 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Foden 8.

Points: Foden: 20Neto: 40
xGI (6 gw): Foden: 0.24Neto: 0.31
Price: Foden: £6.8mNeto: £6.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Foden	Neto
Price & ownership	1	2
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	2	4
Season totals	3	3
Set pieces	1	0
Bonus	0	3
Fixtures	0	1
FPL ranks	1	4
Total	8	21

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Foden: Points 20, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 97, Mins (6 gw) 26, DC (6 gw) 0.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Neto: Points 40, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 185, Mins (6 gw) 86, DC (6 gw) 7.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Neto leads 2 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Price	6.8m(best)	6.6m−0.2m vs best
Ownership	2.5%−2% vs best	5%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.8%−0.3% vs best	1.1%(best)

Availability	Available	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Neto leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Starts	4−4 vs best	8(best)

Start rate	44%−45% vs best	89%(best)

Minutes (season)	349−328 vs best	677(best)

Avg minutes	39−36 vs best	75(best)

Who has better recent form?

Neto leads 4 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Mins (6 gw)	26−60 vs best	86(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.11−0.11 vs best	0.22(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.13(best)	0.09−0.04 vs best

xGI (6 gw)	0.24−0.07 vs best	0.31(best)

DC (6 gw)	0.67−6.33 vs best	7.00(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.24(best)	1.13+0.89 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Split

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Points	20−20 vs best	40(best)

Goals	1−2 vs best	3(best)

Assists	2(best)	1−1 vs best

Total xG	2.27(best)	1.79−0.48 vs best

Total xA	1.63(best)	0.98−0.65 vs best

DC (season)	18−39 vs best	57(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Foden leads 1 of 1

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Corners & indirect FKs	2nd choice	2nd choice
Direct free kicks	2nd choice(best)	5th choice
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Neto leads 3 of 3

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Foden	Neto
BPS	97−88 vs best	185(best)

BPS (6 gw)	6.8−15.5 vs best	22.3(best)

Bonus	3	3
Bonus (6 gw)	0.3−0.2 vs best	0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Neto leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Next 5 GWs	NFO (A) 10 FUL (H) 11 ARS (A) 12 LEE (H) 13 BRE (A) 14	SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	3.20+0.40 vs best	2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Neto leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Foden	Neto
Form	2.8 58th MID · 138th overall	6.5(best) 3rd MID · 13th overall
ICT index	39.5 38th MID · 62nd overall	65.7(best) 9th MID · 11th overall
Selected	38th MID 116th overall	25th MID(best) 71st overall
Points per game	2.9 78th MID · 180th overall	4.4(best) 24th MID · 60th overall
Cost rank	18th MID(best) 30th overall	24th MID 36th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

FodenMCI
1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
NetoCHE
1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Foden (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals, Neto (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Foden−1.3Foden: 1 goals from 2.27 xG (−1.3)
Neto+1.2Neto: 3 goals from 1.79 xG (+1.2)

Foden has 1.3 fewer goals than xG; Neto has 1.2 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Foden+0.4Foden: 2 assists from 1.63 xA (+0.4)
Neto±0.0Neto: 1 assists from 0.98 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Foden · 20 pts42% from appearances
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Neto · 40 pts40% from appearances
−2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Foden	Neto
Appearances	10	17
Goals	5	15
Assists	6	3
Clean sheets	0	2
Defensive contribution	0	2
Bonus	3	3
Deductions	−4	−2
Total	20	40

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Foden6.3(3)
Neto2.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

Foden0.0(3)
Neto5.4(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Foden1.0(1)
Neto3.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Neto 3.7 points per game, Foden 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Foden3.0(4)
Neto4.0(5)

Away

Foden2.7(3)
Neto5.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Neto 5.0 points per game, Foden 2.7 points per game.

Foden25%
1 goal and 2 assists of 12 MCI goals
Neto21%
3 goals and 1 assist of 19 CHE goals

Foden is involved in 25% of MCI's goals, against 21% for Neto.

Who is a rotation risk?

Foden1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Neto1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Foden106.0
Neto217.4

Creativity

Foden206.6
Neto181.4

Threat

Foden84.0
Neto258.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Foden's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Neto's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Foden−12.2k15.4k out3.2k in
Neto+14.9k17.2k out32.1k in

Neto has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+14.9k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Foden 2.9 points per £m (100th), Neto 6.1 points per £m (22nd). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Foden
Neto

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Neto 30, Foden 9.

How far ahead is Foden? Above zero Foden leads; below, Neto.

Neto is 21 points ahead of Foden over these gameweeks. Neto's was 21 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Foden, gameweek 4: -2 points v MUN away, 22 minutes
Neto, gameweek 4: 2 points v HUL home, 85 minutes
GW 5
Foden, gameweek 5: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutes
Neto, gameweek 5: 2 points v BRE away, 86 minutes
GW 6
Foden, gameweek 6: 0 points v LIV away, 0 minutes
Neto, gameweek 6: 5 points v BOU home, 82 minutes
GW 7
Foden, gameweek 7: 9 points v IPS home, 76 minutes
Neto, gameweek 7: 15 points v EVE away, 90 minutes
GW 8
Foden, gameweek 8: 1 points v AVL away, 45 minutes
Neto, gameweek 8: 3 points v TOT home, 87 minutes
GW 9
Foden, gameweek 9: 1 points v BHA home, 11 minutes
Neto, gameweek 9: 3 points v MUN home, 86 minutes

Foden: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Neto: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	-2	2
5	0	2
6	0	5
7	9	15
8	1	3
9	1	3

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	22	85
5	0	86
6	0	82
7	76	90
8	45	87
9	11	86

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	0.00	0.05
5	0.00	0.16
6	0.00	0.16
7	0.62	0.37
8	0.04	0.16
9	0.00	0.42

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	0.02	0.10
5	0.00	0.05
6	0.00	0.06
7	0.54	0.24
8	0.17	0.05
9	0.04	0.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	0.02	0.15
5	0.00	0.21
6	0.00	0.22
7	1.16	0.61
8	0.21	0.21
9	0.04	0.47

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	0	7
5	0	6
6	0	6
7	3	9
8	1	12
9	0	2

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	1	2
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	1
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	3.7%	1.5%
5	1.9%	1.4%
6	1.5%	1.4%
7	1.5%	1.4%
8	2.7%	3.6%
9	2.6%	5.0%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	£7.0m	£6.5m
5	£6.9m	£6.5m
6	£6.9m	£6.5m
7	£6.8m	£6.5m
8	£6.8m	£6.5m
9	£6.8m	£6.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Foden	Neto
4	—	—
5	0.4%	0.1%
6	0.2%	0.1%
7	0.8%	0.2%
8	1.7%	1.0%
9	0.8%	1.1%