How do Foden and Ødegaard compare?

Ødegaard has more season points (39 vs 20), Ødegaard is more owned (16.5% vs 2.5%), Ødegaard is cheaper (6.7m vs 6.8m), Ødegaard has the higher Start rate (100% vs 44%), but Ødegaard has more Bonus (6 vs 3).

Foden

9 stats won

Ødegaard

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Foden or Ødegaard?

Ødegaard wins 22 of 31 stats

Ødegaard wins 22 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Foden 9.

Points
Foden: 20Ødegaard: 39
xGI (6 gw)
Foden: 0.24Ødegaard: 0.37
Price
Foden: £6.8mØdegaard: £6.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionFodenØdegaard
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals24
Set pieces21
Bonus13
Fixtures00
FPL ranks23
Total922

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Foden: Points 20, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 97, Mins (6 gw) 26, DC (6 gw) 0.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Ødegaard: Points 39, xGI (6 gw) 0.37, BPS 194, Mins (6 gw) 85, DC (6 gw) 4.3, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Ødegaard leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatFodenØdegaard
Price

6.8m(best)

6.7m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

2.5%−14.0% vs best

16.5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.8%−3.2% vs best

4.0%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatFodenØdegaard
Starts

4−5 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

44%−56% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

349−384 vs best

733(best)

Avg minutes

39−42 vs best

81(best)

Who has better recent form?

Ødegaard leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatFodenØdegaard
Mins (6 gw)

26−59 vs best

85(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.11−0.08 vs best

0.19(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.13−0.05 vs best

0.18(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.24−0.13 vs best

0.37(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.67−3.66 vs best

4.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.24(best)

0.94+0.70 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatFodenØdegaard
Points

20−19 vs best

39(best)

Goals

1−1 vs best

2(best)

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

2.27(best)

2.16−0.11 vs best

Total xA

1.63−0.51 vs best

2.14(best)

DC (season)

18−24 vs best

42(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Foden leads 2 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatFodenØdegaard
Corners & indirect FKs

2nd choice(best)

3rd choice

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

4th choice

Penalties

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Ødegaard leads 3 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatFodenØdegaard
BPS

97−97 vs best

194(best)

BPS (6 gw)

6.8−8.7 vs best

15.5(best)

Bonus

3−3 vs best

6(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3(best)

0.0−0.3 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatFodenØdegaard
Next 5 GWs

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

HUL

(H)

10

NEW

(A)

11

MCI

(H)

12

BRE

(A)

13

TOT

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20

3.20

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Ødegaard leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatFodenØdegaard
Form

2.8(best)

58th MID · 138th overall

2.5

73rd MID · 161st overall

ICT index

39.5

38th MID · 62nd overall

60.7(best)

13th MID · 18th overall

Selected

38th MID

116th overall

8th MID(best)

23rd overall

Points per game

2.9

78th MID · 180th overall

4.3(best)

27th MID · 67th overall

Cost rank

18th MID(best)

30th overall

19th MID

31st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • FodenMCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
  • ØdegaardARS

    1. ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.79 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
    2. ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Ødegaard (ARS) 4.6 projected team goals, Foden (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Foden−1.3Foden: 1 goals from 2.27 xG (−1.3)
  • Ødegaard−0.2Ødegaard: 2 goals from 2.16 xG (−0.2)

Foden has 1.3 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Foden+0.4Foden: 2 assists from 1.63 xA (+0.4)
  • Ødegaard−2.1Ødegaard: 0 assists from 2.14 xA (−2.1)

Ødegaard has 2.1 fewer assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Foden · 20 pts42% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Ødegaard · 39 pts45% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceFodenØdegaard
Appearances1018
Goals510
Assists60
Clean sheets06
Bonus36
Deductions−4−1
Total2039

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Foden6.3(3)
  • Ødegaard7.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Foden0.0(3)
  • Ødegaard2.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Foden1.0(1)
  • Ødegaard5.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Ødegaard 5.0 points per game, Foden 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Foden3.0(4)
  • Ødegaard6.3(4)

Away

  • Foden2.7(3)
  • Ødegaard2.8(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Ødegaard 2.8 points per game, Foden 2.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Foden25%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 12 MCI goals

  • Ødegaard14%

    2 goals and 0 assists of 14 ARS goals

Foden is involved in 25% of MCI's goals, against 14% for Ødegaard.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Foden1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

  • Ødegaard2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Foden106.0
  • Ødegaard163.6

Creativity

  • Foden206.6
  • Ødegaard274.1

Threat

  • Foden84.0
  • Ødegaard169.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Foden's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Ødegaard's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Foden−12.2k15.4k out3.2k in
  • Ødegaard−30.5k48.9k out18.4k in

Managers are selling all of them; Foden the least (−12.2k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Foden 2.9 points per £m (100th), Ødegaard 5.8 points per £m (26th). Median 2.5.
  • Foden
  • Ødegaard

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Ødegaard 15, Foden 9.

How far ahead is Foden? Above zero Foden leads; below, Ødegaard.

Ødegaard is 6 points ahead of Foden over these gameweeks. Ødegaard's was 8 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Foden, gameweek 4: -2 points v MUN away, 22 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 4: 3 points v SUN away, 84 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Foden, gameweek 5: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 5: 2 points v BHA away, 72 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Foden, gameweek 6: 0 points v LIV away, 0 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 6: 1 points v LEE home, 89 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Foden, gameweek 7: 9 points v IPS home, 76 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 7: 3 points v NFO away, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Foden, gameweek 8: 1 points v AVL away, 45 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 8: 3 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Foden, gameweek 9: 1 points v BHA home, 11 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 9: 3 points v LIV away, 87 minutes

Foden: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Ødegaard: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
4-23
502
601
793
813
913

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
42284
5072
6089
77690
84590
91187

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
40.000.00
50.000.07
60.000.82
70.620.00
80.040.26
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
40.020.25
50.000.02
60.000.12
70.540.16
80.170.42
90.040.12

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
40.020.25
50.000.09
60.000.94
71.160.16
80.210.68
90.040.12

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
405
502
606
732
813
908

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
400
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
43.7%19.1%
51.9%20.0%
61.5%20.4%
71.5%19.0%
82.7%18.4%
92.6%16.4%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
4£7.0m£6.7m
5£6.9m£6.8m
6£6.9m£6.8m
7£6.8m£6.8m
8£6.8m£6.8m
9£6.8m£6.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWFodenØdegaard
4——
50.4%16.7%
60.2%14.5%
70.8%9.5%
81.7%7.1%
90.8%4.0%