How do Fernandes and Lewis-Potter compare?

Lewis-Potter has more season points (38 vs 19), Lewis-Potter is more owned (1.9% vs 0.7%), Lewis-Potter is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.6m), Lewis-Potter has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Lewis-Potter has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Fernandes has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Fernandes

8 stats won

Lewis-Potter

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Fernandes or Lewis-Potter?

Lewis-Potter wins 20 of 28 stats

Lewis-Potter wins 20 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Fernandes 8.

Points
Fernandes: 19Lewis-Potter: 38
xGI (6 gw)
Fernandes: 0.17Lewis-Potter: 0.10
Price
Fernandes: £5.6mLewis-Potter: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionFernandesLewis-Potter
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form41
Season totals14
Set pieces01
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks14
Total820

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Fernandes: Points 19, xGI (6 gw) 0.17, BPS 104, Mins (6 gw) 51, DC (6 gw) 6.5, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Lewis-Potter: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.10, BPS 148, Mins (6 gw) 75, DC (6 gw) 6.0, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Lewis-Potter leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Price

5.6m(best)

5.5m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

0.7%−1.2% vs best

1.9%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−0.4% vs best

0.4%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Starts

5−4 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

56%−44% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

449−266 vs best

715(best)

Avg minutes

50−29 vs best

79(best)

Who has better recent form?

Fernandes leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Mins (6 gw)

51−24 vs best

75(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.06

0.06

xA (6 gw)

0.12(best)

0.04−0.08 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.17(best)

0.10−0.07 vs best

DC (6 gw)

6.50(best)

6.00−0.50 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.43(best)

1.23+0.80 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Points

19−19 vs best

38(best)

Goals

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Assists

1

1

Total xG

0.35−1.05 vs best

1.40(best)

Total xA

0.93(best)

0.90−0.03 vs best

DC (season)

49−14 vs best

63(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Lewis-Potter leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Corners & indirect FKs

4th choice

4th choice

Direct free kicks

—

1st choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
BPS

104−44 vs best

148(best)

BPS (6 gw)

11.8−1.2 vs best

13.0(best)

Bonus

0−5 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.3 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Fernandes leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

BHA

(A)

10

EVE

(H)

11

MUN

(A)

12

ARS

(H)

13

MCI

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatFernandesLewis-Potter
Form

3.0

46th MID · 114th overall

4.0(best)

26th MID · 69th overall

ICT index

31.3

64th MID · 108th overall

43.6(best)

33rd MID · 50th overall

Selected

70th MID

217th overall

44th MID(best)

131st overall

Points per game

2.1

114th MID · 257th overall

4.2(best)

29th MID · 74th overall

Cost rank

77th MID(best)

120th overall

82nd MID

134th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • FernandesTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • Lewis-PotterBRE

    1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
    2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Fernandes (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Lewis-Potter (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Fernandes−0.3Fernandes: 0 goals from 0.35 xG (−0.3)
  • Lewis-Potter+0.6Lewis-Potter: 2 goals from 1.40 xG (+0.6)

Lewis-Potter has 0.6 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Fernandes+0.1Fernandes: 1 assists from 0.93 xA (+0.1)
  • Lewis-Potter+0.1Lewis-Potter: 1 assists from 0.90 xA (+0.1)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Fernandes · 19 pts62% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Lewis-Potter · 38 pts45% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceFernandesLewis-Potter
Appearances1317
Goals010
Assists33
Clean sheets33
Defensive contribution20
Bonus05
Deductions−20
Total1938

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Fernandes1.3(3)
  • Lewis-Potter2.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Fernandes1.8(4)
  • Lewis-Potter5.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Fernandes4.0(2)
  • Lewis-Potter4.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Lewis-Potter 4.3 points per game, Fernandes 4.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Fernandes2.0(5)
  • Lewis-Potter5.4(5)

Away

  • Fernandes2.3(4)
  • Lewis-Potter2.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Lewis-Potter 2.8 points per game, Fernandes 2.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Fernandes10%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 10 TOT goals

  • Lewis-Potter19%

    2 goals and 1 assist of 16 BRE goals

Lewis-Potter is involved in 19% of BRE's goals, against 10% for Fernandes.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Fernandes3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 5 × 1–59

  • Lewis-Potter3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Fernandes66.6
  • Lewis-Potter171.2

Creativity

  • Fernandes194.1
  • Lewis-Potter162.7

Threat

  • Fernandes57.0
  • Lewis-Potter103.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Fernandes's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Lewis-Potter's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Fernandes+9761.1k out2.1k in
  • Lewis-Potter−4.2k6.8k out2.6k in

Fernandes has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+976).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Fernandes 3.4 points per £m (88th), Lewis-Potter 6.9 points per £m (10th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Fernandes
  • Lewis-Potter

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Lewis-Potter 20, Fernandes 16.

How far ahead is Fernandes? Above zero Fernandes leads; below, Lewis-Potter.

Lewis-Potter is 4 points ahead of Fernandes over these gameweeks. Fernandes's biggest lead was 2 (GW 4); Lewis-Potter's was 9 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Fernandes, gameweek 4: 3 points v EVE home, 62 minutes
    Lewis-Potter, gameweek 4: 1 points v BOU away, 59 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Fernandes, gameweek 5: 1 points v AVL home, 45 minutes
    Lewis-Potter, gameweek 5: 3 points v CHE home, 80 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Fernandes, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 1 minutes
    Lewis-Potter, gameweek 6: 2 points v AVL away, 66 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Fernandes, gameweek 7: 1 points v COV home, 19 minutes
    Lewis-Potter, gameweek 7: 9 points v LIV home, 76 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Fernandes, gameweek 8: 7 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Lewis-Potter, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 77 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Fernandes, gameweek 9: 3 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Lewis-Potter, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 90 minutes

Fernandes: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Lewis-Potter: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
431
513
612
719
872
933

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
46259
54580
6166
71976
89077
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
40.110.03
50.070.15
60.000.04
70.060.15
80.020.00
90.080.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
40.030.13
50.020.01
60.000.04
70.000.03
80.160.02
90.490.02

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
40.140.16
50.090.16
60.000.08
70.060.18
80.180.02
90.570.02

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
442
579
615
735
8145
91010

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
400
500
600
701
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
400
500
600
700
810
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
40.9%2.1%
50.8%1.7%
60.7%1.6%
70.7%1.5%
80.6%2.0%
90.7%2.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
4£5.8m£5.5m
5£5.8m£5.5m
6£5.7m£5.5m
7£5.7m£5.5m
8£5.7m£5.5m
9£5.6m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWFernandesLewis-Potter
4——
50.0%0.5%
60.0%0.3%
70.0%0.3%
80.0%0.4%
90.0%0.4%