How do Doku and Ødegaard compare?

Ødegaard has more season points (39 vs 23), Ødegaard is more owned (16.5% vs 4.6%), Ødegaard is cheaper (6.7m vs 7.5m), Ødegaard has the higher Start rate (100% vs 33%), but Ødegaard has more Bonus (6 vs 4).

← Back to players Pick different players

Doku

11 stats won

Ødegaard

19 stats won

Who wins more stats: Doku or Ødegaard?

Ødegaard wins 19 of 30 stats

Ødegaard wins 19 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Doku 11.

Points
Doku: 23Ødegaard: 39
xGI (6 gw)
Doku: 0.39Ødegaard: 0.37
Price
Doku: £7.5mØdegaard: £6.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionDokuØdegaard
Price & ownership21
Playing time04
Recent form33
Season totals15
Set pieces02
Bonus22
Fixtures00
FPL ranks32
Total1119

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Doku: Points 23, xGI (6 gw) 0.39, BPS 138, Mins (6 gw) 51, DC (6 gw) 3.2, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Ødegaard: Points 39, xGI (6 gw) 0.37, BPS 194, Mins (6 gw) 85, DC (6 gw) 4.3, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Doku leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatDokuØdegaard
Price

7.5m(best)

6.7m−0.8m vs best

Ownership

4.6%−11.9% vs best

16.5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

4.1%(best)

4.0%−0.1% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatDokuØdegaard
Starts

3−6 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

33%−67% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

305−428 vs best

733(best)

Avg minutes

34−47 vs best

81(best)

Who has better recent form?

Split
Who has better recent form?
StatDokuØdegaard
Mins (6 gw)

51−34 vs best

85(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.12−0.07 vs best

0.19(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.27(best)

0.18−0.09 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.39(best)

0.37−0.02 vs best

DC (6 gw)

3.17−1.16 vs best

4.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.53(best)

0.94+0.41 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Ødegaard leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatDokuØdegaard
Points

23−16 vs best

39(best)

Goals

1−1 vs best

2(best)

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

0.70−1.46 vs best

2.16(best)

Total xA

1.64−0.50 vs best

2.14(best)

DC (season)

19−23 vs best

42(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Ødegaard leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatDokuØdegaard
Corners & indirect FKs

—

3rd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

4th choice(best)

Penalties

3rd choice

3rd choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Split
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatDokuØdegaard
BPS

138−56 vs best

194(best)

BPS (6 gw)

23.0(best)

15.5−7.5 vs best

Bonus

4−2 vs best

6(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.7(best)

0.0−0.7 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatDokuØdegaard
Next 5 GWs

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

HUL

(H)

10

NEW

(A)

11

MCI

(H)

12

BRE

(A)

13

TOT

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20

3.20

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Doku leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatDokuØdegaard
Form

5.5(best)

10th MID · 24th overall

2.5

73rd MID · 161st overall

ICT index

44.2

31st MID · 47th overall

60.7(best)

13th MID · 18th overall

Selected

26th MID

76th overall

8th MID(best)

23rd overall

Points per game

4.6(best)

22nd MID · 53rd overall

4.3

27th MID · 67th overall

Cost rank

11th MID(best)

17th overall

19th MID

31st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • DokuMCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

  • ØdegaardARS

    1. ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.79 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
    2. ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Ødegaard (ARS) 4.6 projected team goals, Doku (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Doku+0.3Doku: 1 goals from 0.70 xG (+0.3)
  • Ødegaard−0.2Ødegaard: 2 goals from 2.16 xG (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Doku+0.4Doku: 2 assists from 1.64 xA (+0.4)
  • Ødegaard−2.1Ødegaard: 0 assists from 2.14 xA (−2.1)

Ødegaard has 2.1 fewer assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Doku · 23 pts35% from appearances

  • Ødegaard · 39 pts45% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceDokuØdegaard
Appearances818
Goals510
Assists60
Clean sheets06
Bonus46
Deductions0−1
Total2339

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Doku3.5(2)
  • Ødegaard7.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Doku2.0(1)
  • Ødegaard2.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Doku7.0(2)
  • Ødegaard5.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Doku 7.0 points per game, Ødegaard 5.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Doku3.0(3)
  • Ødegaard6.3(4)

Away

  • Doku7.0(2)
  • Ødegaard2.8(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Doku 7.0 points per game, Ødegaard 2.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Doku25%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 12 MCI goals

  • Ødegaard14%

    2 goals and 0 assists of 14 ARS goals

Doku is involved in 25% of MCI's goals, against 14% for Ødegaard.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Doku2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 4 × Didn't play

  • Ødegaard2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Doku113.6
  • Ødegaard163.6

Creativity

  • Doku175.1
  • Ødegaard274.1

Threat

  • Doku154.0
  • Ødegaard169.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Doku's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Ødegaard's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Doku+4.9k15.2k out20.1k in
  • Ødegaard−30.9k49.5k out18.6k in

Doku has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+4.9k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Doku 3.1 points per £m (93rd), Ødegaard 5.8 points per £m (26th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Doku
  • Ødegaard

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Doku 23, Ødegaard 15.

How far ahead is Doku? Above zero Doku leads; below, Ødegaard.

Doku is 8 points ahead of Ødegaard over these gameweeks. Doku's biggest lead was 10 (GW 7); Ødegaard's was 4 (GW 5).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Doku, gameweek 4: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 4: 3 points v SUN away, 84 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Doku, gameweek 5: 1 points v SUN home, 15 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 5: 2 points v BHA away, 72 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Doku, gameweek 6: 12 points v LIV away, 34 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 6: 1 points v LEE home, 89 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Doku, gameweek 7: 6 points v IPS home, 76 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 7: 3 points v NFO away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Doku, gameweek 8: 2 points v AVL away, 90 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 8: 3 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Doku, gameweek 9: 2 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 9: 3 points v LIV away, 87 minutes

Doku: 1 haul (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Ødegaard: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
403
512
6121
763
823
923

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
4084
51572
63489
77690
89090
99087

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
40.000.00
50.230.07
60.050.82
70.130.00
80.150.26
90.140.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
40.000.25
50.320.02
60.090.12
70.360.16
80.440.42
90.430.12

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
40.000.25
50.550.09
60.140.94
70.490.16
80.590.68
90.570.12

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
405
522
606
742
823
9118

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
400
500
610
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
400
500
610
710
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
40.7%19.1%
50.7%20.0%
60.8%20.4%
71.9%19.0%
83.5%18.4%
94.8%16.4%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
4£7.4m£6.7m
5£7.4m£6.8m
6£7.4m£6.8m
7£7.4m£6.8m
8£7.5m£6.8m
9£7.5m£6.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWDokuØdegaard
4——
50.0%16.7%
60.0%14.5%
71.8%9.5%
83.0%7.1%
94.1%4.0%