How do Beto and Zirkzee compare?
Zirkzee has more season points (4 vs 2), but Zirkzee is cheaper (5.3m vs 5.4m).
Who wins more stats: Beto or Zirkzee?
Zirkzee wins 14 of 19 stats
Zirkzee wins 14 of the 19 stats with an outright best. Others: Beto 5.
- Points
- Beto: 2Zirkzee: 4
- xGI (6 gw)
- Beto: 0.00Zirkzee: 0.06
- Price
- Beto: £5.4mZirkzee: £5.3m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 0 |
| Playing time | 0 | 2 |
| Recent form | 1 | 5 |
| Season totals | 0 | 3 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 0 | 2 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 5 | 14 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Beto leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.4m(best) | 5.3m−0.1m vs best |
| Ownership | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Availability | 0% · Has joined Fiorentina permanently | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Zirkzee leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0 | 0 |
| Start rate | 0% | 0% |
| Minutes (season) | 31−51 vs best | 82(best) |
| Avg minutes | 3−6 vs best | 9(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Zirkzee leads 5 of 6
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 0−14 vs best | 14(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00−0.04 vs best | 0.04(best) |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00−0.01 vs best | 0.01(best) |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00−0.06 vs best | 0.06(best) |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00−1.17 vs best | 1.17(best) |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.00(best) | 0.20+0.20 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Zirkzee leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 2−2 vs best | 4(best) |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.09−0.17 vs best | 0.26(best) |
| Total xA | 0.00−0.08 vs best | 0.08(best) |
See alsoForward stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Zirkzee leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 5−13 vs best | 18(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 0.0−3.0 vs best | 3.0(best) |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | COV (H) 10 BRE (A) 11 LIV (H) 12 AVL (A) 13 FUL (H) 14 | AVL (H) 10 LIV (A) 11 BRE (H) 12 NEW (A) 13 COV (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.00 | 3.00 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Beto leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 0.0 67th FWD · 635th overall | 0.5(best) 39th FWD · 347th overall |
| ICT index | 0.8 48th FWD · 425th overall | 8.2(best) 34th FWD · 319th overall |
| Selected | 40th FWD(best) 264th overall | 44th FWD 273rd overall |
| Points per game | 1.0(best) 43rd FWD · 420th overall | 0.8 48th FWD · 442nd overall |
| Cost rank | 43rd FWD(best) 181st overall | 49th FWD 211th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
BetoEVE
- EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
- EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
ZirkzeeMUN
- MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
- MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Beto (EVE) 2.6 projected team goals, Zirkzee (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Beto−0.1Beto: 0 goals from 0.09 xG (−0.1)
- Zirkzee−0.3Zirkzee: 0 goals from 0.26 xG (−0.3)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Assists vs xA
- Beto±0.0Beto: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
- Zirkzee−0.1Zirkzee: 0 assists from 0.08 xA (−0.1)
Everyone is within half a assist of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Beto · 2 pts100% from appearances
Zirkzee · 4 pts100% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 2 | 5 |
| Deductions | 0 | −1 |
| Total | 2 | 4 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Beto1.0(1)
- ZirkzeeNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- BetoNo games
- Zirkzee1.0(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Beto1.0(1)
- Zirkzee0.5(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Beto 1.0 points per game, Zirkzee 0.5 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Beto1.0(1)
- Zirkzee1.0(3)
Away
- Beto1.0(1)
- Zirkzee0.5(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Beto 1.0 points per game, Zirkzee 0.5 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Beto0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 3 EVE goals
Zirkzee0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 2 MUN goals
Beto is involved in 0% of EVE's goals, against 0% for Zirkzee.
Who is a rotation risk?
Beto0 of 9 full games
2 × 1–59, 7 × Didn't play
Zirkzee0 of 9 full games
5 × 1–59, 4 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Beto3.0
- Zirkzee14.8
Creativity
- Beto0.3
- Zirkzee42.8
Threat
- Beto5.0
- Zirkzee28.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Beto's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Zirkzee's biggest score is creativity, a creator.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Beto−770770 out0 in
- Zirkzee−9571.4k out452 in
Managers are selling all of them; Beto the least (−770 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Beto
- Zirkzee
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Beto, gameweek 4: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutesZirkzee, gameweek 4: 1 points v MCI home, 7 minutesGW 5
Beto, gameweek 5: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutesZirkzee, gameweek 5: 1 points v FUL away, 13 minutesGW 6
Beto, gameweek 6: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutesZirkzee, gameweek 6: 1 points v TOT home, 31 minutesGW 7
Beto, gameweek 7: 0 points v CHE home, 0 minutesZirkzee, gameweek 7: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutesGW 8
Beto, gameweek 8: 0 points v ARS away, 0 minutesZirkzee, gameweek 8: 1 points v BOU home, 18 minutesGW 9
Beto, gameweek 9: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutesZirkzee, gameweek 9: 0 points v CHE away, 13 minutes
Beto: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Zirkzee: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 7 |
| 5 | 0 | 13 |
| 6 | 0 | 31 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 18 |
| 9 | 0 | 13 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 0 | 2 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| 5 | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| 6 | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| 7 | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| 8 | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| 9 | 0.4% | 0.4% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.4m | £5.4m |
| 5 | £5.4m | £5.4m |
| 6 | £5.4m | £5.3m |
| 7 | £5.4m | £5.3m |
| 8 | £5.4m | £5.3m |
| 9 | £5.4m | £5.3m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Beto | Zirkzee |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.0% |

