How do Ballard and Dalot compare?

Dalot has more season points (16 vs 14), Dalot is more owned (1.3% vs 1%), Ballard is cheaper (4.7m vs 4.8m), Dalot has the higher Start rate (78% vs 56%), but Dalot has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.40).

Ballard

6 stats won

Dalot

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Ballard or Dalot?

Dalot wins 20 of 26 stats

Dalot wins 20 of the 26 stats with an outright best. Others: Ballard 6.

Points
Ballard: 14Dalot: 16
xGI (6 gw)
Ballard: 0.04Dalot: 0.06
Price
Ballard: £4.7mDalot: £4.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionBallardDalot
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals23
Set pieces00
Bonus02
Fixtures01
FPL ranks14
Total620

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Ballard: Points 14, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 31, Mins (6 gw) 30, DC (6 gw) 3.3, Upcoming FDR 3.40. Dalot: Points 16, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 75, Mins (6 gw) 80, DC (6 gw) 6.5, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Dalot leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatBallardDalot
Price

4.7m−0.1m vs best

4.8m(best)

Ownership

1%−0.3% vs best

1.3%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.1%(best)

0.0%−0.1% vs best

Availability

0% · Hamstring injury - Unknown return date

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Dalot leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatBallardDalot
Starts

5−2 vs best

7(best)

Start rate

56%−22% vs best

78%(best)

Minutes (season)

450−197 vs best

647(best)

Avg minutes

50−22 vs best

72(best)

Who has better recent form?

Dalot leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatBallardDalot
Mins (6 gw)

30−50 vs best

80(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.02−0.02 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.04 vs best

0.04(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.04−0.02 vs best

0.06(best)

DC (6 gw)

3.33−3.17 vs best

6.50(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.78(best)

1.60+0.82 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Dalot leads 3 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatBallardDalot
Points

14−2 vs best

16(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.31(best)

0.27−0.04 vs best

Total xA

0.16−0.23 vs best

0.39(best)

DC (season)

49−1 vs best

50(best)

Clean sheets

1(best)

0−1 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatBallardDalot
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Dalot leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatBallardDalot
BPS

31−44 vs best

75(best)

BPS (6 gw)

-2.0−10.2 vs best

8.2(best)

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Dalot leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatBallardDalot
Next 5 GWs

CHE

(H)

10

AVL

(A)

11

TOT

(H)

12

LIV

(A)

13

NEW

(A)

14

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.40+0.40 vs best

3.00(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Dalot leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatBallardDalot
Form

0.0

200th DEF · 545th overall

2.0(best)

72nd DEF · 184th overall

ICT index

16.3

81st DEF · 226th overall

39.5(best)

13th DEF · 61st overall

Selected

72nd DEF

182nd overall

59th DEF(best)

154th overall

Points per game

2.8(best)

73rd DEF · 183rd overall

1.8

107th DEF · 291st overall

Cost rank

81st DEF

423rd overall

69th DEF(best)

387th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • BallardSUN

    1. SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
    2. SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance
  • DalotMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Dalot (MUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets, Ballard (SUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Ballard−0.3Ballard: 0 goals from 0.31 xG (−0.3)
  • Dalot−0.3Dalot: 0 goals from 0.27 xG (−0.3)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Ballard−0.2Ballard: 0 assists from 0.16 xA (−0.2)
  • Dalot−0.4Dalot: 0 assists from 0.39 xA (−0.4)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Ballard+1.3Ballard: 10 conceded from 8.66 xGC (+1.3)
  • Dalot−0.6Dalot: 11 conceded from 11.60 xGC (−0.6)

Ballard has conceded 1.3 more than xGC; Dalot has conceded 0.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Ballard · 14 pts50% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Dalot · 16 pts80% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceBallardDalot
Appearances1016
Clean sheets40
Defensive contribution64
Deductions−6−4
Total1416

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Ballard4.0(2)
  • Dalot1.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • BallardNo games
  • Dalot1.6(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Ballard2.0(3)
  • Dalot2.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Dalot 2.5 points per game, Ballard 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Ballard4.0(2)
  • Dalot1.3(4)

Away

  • Ballard2.0(3)
  • Dalot2.2(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Dalot 2.2 points per game, Ballard 2.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Ballard0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 6 SUN goals

  • Dalot0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 10 MUN goals

Ballard is involved in 0% of SUN's goals, against 0% for Dalot.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Ballard5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 4 × Didn't play

  • Dalot5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Ballard104.2
  • Dalot128.0

Creativity

  • Ballard23.8
  • Dalot195.0

Threat

  • Ballard35.0
  • Dalot71.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Ballard's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Dalot's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Ballard−4.4k4.4k out15 in
  • Dalot−3.1k3.4k out330 in

Managers are selling all of them; Dalot the least (−3.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Ballard 3.0 points per £m (83rd), Dalot 3.3 points per £m (79th). Median 3.3.
  • Ballard
  • Dalot

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Dalot 12, Ballard 2.

How far ahead is Ballard? Above zero Ballard leads; below, Dalot.

Dalot is 10 points ahead of Ballard over these gameweeks. Dalot's was 10 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Ballard, gameweek 4: 0 points v ARS home, 90 minutes
    Dalot, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 90 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Ballard, gameweek 5: 2 points v MCI away, 90 minutes
    Dalot, gameweek 5: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Ballard, gameweek 6: 0 points v BHA home, 0 minutes
    Dalot, gameweek 6: 0 points v TOT home, 31 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Ballard, gameweek 7: 0 points v BOU away, 0 minutes
    Dalot, gameweek 7: 4 points v LEE away, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Ballard, gameweek 8: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutes
    Dalot, gameweek 8: 1 points v BOU home, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Ballard, gameweek 9: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutes
    Dalot, gameweek 9: 3 points v CHE away, 90 minutes

Ballard: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Dalot: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
402
522
600
704
801
903

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
49090
59090
6031
7090
8090
9090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
40.080.02
50.140.06
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.03
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
40.010.05
50.000.05
60.000.07
70.000.02
80.000.03
90.000.04

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
40.090.07
50.140.11
60.000.07
70.000.02
80.000.06
90.000.04

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
463
5142
605
7012
806
9011

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
41.881.10
52.821.62
60.000.33
70.001.41
80.002.15
90.003.01

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
43.0%1.8%
52.6%1.7%
61.8%1.6%
71.4%1.4%
81.2%1.4%
91.0%1.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
4£4.9m£4.9m
5£4.9m£4.9m
6£4.9m£4.9m
7£4.8m£4.8m
8£4.8m£4.8m
9£4.8m£4.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWBallardDalot
4——
52.3%0.1%
61.1%0.1%
70.5%0.0%
80.3%0.0%
90.1%0.0%