How do Amad and Tielemans compare?

Tielemans has more season points (24 vs 7), Tielemans is more owned (1.2% vs 0.3%), Tielemans has the higher Start rate (89% vs 44%), but Tielemans has more Bonus (2 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Amad

3 stats won

Tielemans

23 stats won

Who wins more stats: Amad or Tielemans?

Tielemans wins 23 of 26 stats

Tielemans wins 23 of the 26 stats with an outright best. Others: Amad 3.

Points
Amad: 7Tielemans: 24
xGI (6 gw)
Amad: 0.15Tielemans: 0.15
Price
Amad: £5.7mTielemans: £5.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionAmadTielemans
Price & ownership01
Playing time04
Recent form14
Season totals14
Set pieces11
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks05
Total323

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Amad: Points 7, xGI (6 gw) 0.15, BPS 42, Mins (6 gw) 50, DC (6 gw) 4.7, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Tielemans: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.15, BPS 136, Mins (6 gw) 57, DC (6 gw) 7.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tielemans leads 1 of 1
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatAmadTielemans
Price

5.7m

5.7m

Ownership

0.3%−0.9% vs best

1.2%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatAmadTielemans
Starts

4−4 vs best

8(best)

Start rate

44%−45% vs best

89%(best)

Minutes (season)

301−287 vs best

588(best)

Avg minutes

33−32 vs best

65(best)

Who has better recent form?

Tielemans leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatAmadTielemans
Mins (6 gw)

50−7 vs best

57(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.12(best)

0.02−0.10 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.03−0.10 vs best

0.13(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.15

0.15

DC (6 gw)

4.67−2.50 vs best

7.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.17+0.23 vs best

0.94(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Tielemans leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatAmadTielemans
Points

7−17 vs best

24(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.72(best)

0.67−0.05 vs best

Total xA

0.20−0.87 vs best

1.07(best)

DC (season)

28−40 vs best

68(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Split
Who takes the set pieces?
StatAmadTielemans
Corners & indirect FKs

5th choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatAmadTielemans
BPS

42−94 vs best

136(best)

BPS (6 gw)

7.0−6.3 vs best

13.3(best)

Bonus

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.3 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatAmadTielemans
Next 5 GWs

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00

3.00

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tielemans leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatAmadTielemans
Form

1.8

97th MID · 220th overall

2.5(best)

72nd MID · 159th overall

ICT index

11.6

132nd MID · 276th overall

34.8(best)

50th MID · 85th overall

Selected

99th MID

290th overall

52nd MID(best)

159th overall

Points per game

1.8

132nd MID · 295th overall

3.0(best)

71st MID · 169th overall

Cost rank

72nd MID

114th overall

67th MID(best)

106th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • AmadMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

  • TielemansMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Amad (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals, Tielemans (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Amad−0.7Amad: 0 goals from 0.72 xG (−0.7)
  • Tielemans−0.7Tielemans: 0 goals from 0.67 xG (−0.7)

Amad has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Amad−0.2Amad: 0 assists from 0.20 xA (−0.2)
  • Tielemans−0.1Tielemans: 1 assists from 1.07 xA (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Amad · 7 pts100% from appearances

  • Tielemans · 24 pts56% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceAmadTielemans
Appearances714
Assists03
Defensive contribution06
Bonus02
Deductions0−1
Total724

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • AmadNo games
  • Tielemans3.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Amad1.7(3)
  • Tielemans3.2(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Amad2.0(1)
  • Tielemans2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Amad 2.0 points per game, Tielemans 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Amad1.5(2)
  • Tielemans2.3(4)

Away

  • Amad2.0(2)
  • Tielemans3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tielemans 3.8 points per game, Amad 2.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Amad0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 2 MUN goals

  • Tielemans10%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 10 MUN goals

Tielemans is involved in 10% of MUN's goals, against 0% for Amad.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Amad1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Tielemans3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Amad26.2
  • Tielemans130.0

Creativity

  • Amad24.0
  • Tielemans169.0

Threat

  • Amad65.0
  • Tielemans49.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Amad's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Tielemans's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Amad−1.1k1.4k out370 in
  • Tielemans−5.6k5.9k out388 in

Managers are selling all of them; Amad the least (−1.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Amad 1.2 points per £m (158th), Tielemans 4.2 points per £m (64th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Amad
  • Tielemans

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tielemans 16, Amad 7.

How far ahead is Amad? Above zero Amad leads; below, Tielemans.

Tielemans is 9 points ahead of Amad over these gameweeks. Tielemans's was 13 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Amad, gameweek 4: 0 points v MCI home, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 66 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Amad, gameweek 5: 0 points v FUL away, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Amad, gameweek 6: 1 points v TOT home, 58 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 6: 3 points v TOT home, 58 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Amad, gameweek 7: 2 points v LEE away, 90 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 7: 7 points v LEE away, 83 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Amad, gameweek 8: 2 points v BOU home, 77 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 8: 0 points v BOU home, 45 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Amad, gameweek 9: 2 points v CHE away, 76 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 9: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

Amad: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Tielemans: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
402
504
613
727
820
920

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
4066
5090
65858
79083
87745
9760

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
40.000.00
50.000.09
60.060.00
70.080.02
80.020.00
90.560.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
40.000.04
50.000.20
60.030.14
70.020.41
80.090.00
90.060.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
40.000.04
50.000.29
60.090.14
70.100.43
80.110.00
90.620.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
405
5013
6418
7107
840
9100

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
400
500
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
40.4%1.7%
50.3%1.5%
60.3%1.4%
70.3%1.4%
80.3%1.4%
90.3%1.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
4£5.8m£5.9m
5£5.7m£5.8m
6£5.7m£5.8m
7£5.7m£5.7m
8£5.7m£5.7m
9£5.7m£5.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWAmadTielemans
4——
50.0%0.0%
60.0%0.0%
70.0%0.0%
80.0%0.0%
90.0%0.0%