How do Roefs and Sels compare?
Roefs has more season points (24 vs 21), Roefs is more owned (2.1% vs 1.4%), Roefs is cheaper (4.9m vs 5.0m), Roefs has more Bonus (2 vs 0), but Roefs has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.40 vs 3.60).
Who wins more stats: Roefs or Sels?
Roefs wins 14 of 20 stats
Roefs wins 14 of the 20 stats with an outright best. Others: Sels 6.
- Points
- Roefs: 24Sels: 21
- Saves
- Roefs: 16Sels: 17
- Price
- Roefs: £4.9mSels: £5.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 0 |
| Recent form | 2 | 1 |
| Season totals | 3 | 1 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 2 | 2 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 14 | 6 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Roefs leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.9m−0.1m vs best | 5.0m(best) |
| Ownership | 2.1%(best) | 1.4%−0.7% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.7%(best) | 0.2%−0.5% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
No outright winner
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9 | 9 |
| Start rate | 100% | 100% |
| Minutes (season) | 810 | 810 |
| Avg minutes | 90 | 90 |
Who has better recent form?
Roefs leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90 | 90 |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.96+0.97 vs best | 0.99(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Roefs leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 24(best) | 21−3 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.03(best) | 0.02−0.01 vs best |
| Clean sheets | 2(best) | 1−1 vs best |
| Saves | 16−1 vs best | 17(best) |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Split
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 91−3 vs best | 94(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 8.5−0.8 vs best | 9.3(best) |
| Bonus | 2(best) | 0−2 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.3(best) | 0.0−0.3 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Roefs leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | CHE (H) 10 AVL (A) 11 TOT (H) 12 LIV (A) 13 NEW (A) 14 | MCI (H) 10 BOU (A) 11 CHE (H) 12 HUL (A) 13 BHA (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.40(best) | 3.60+0.20 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Roefs leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 3.2(best) 8th GK · 96th overall | 1.8 20th GK · 209th overall |
| ICT index | 16.0(best) 15th GK · 229th overall | 14.8 17th GK · 244th overall |
| Selected | 19th GK(best) 127th overall | 21st GK 150th overall |
| Points per game | 2.7(best) 16th GK · 194th overall | 2.3 19th GK · 230th overall |
| Cost rank | 19th GK 355th overall | 5th GK(best) 245th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
RoefsSUN
- SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
- SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance
SelsNFO
- NFO v MCI home, gameweek 10: 1.02 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance
- NFO v BOU away, gameweek 11: 0.95 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Roefs (SUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets, Sels (NFO) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Roefs+1.3Roefs: 17 conceded from 15.75 xGC (+1.3)
- Sels+2.8Sels: 12 conceded from 9.24 xGC (+2.8)
Sels has conceded 2.8 more than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Roefs · 24 pts55% from appearances
−9 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Sels · 21 pts67% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 18 |
| Clean sheets | 8 | 4 |
| Saves | 5 | 5 |
| Bonus | 2 | 0 |
| Deductions | −9 | −6 |
| Total | 24 | 21 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Roefs2.7(3)
- Sels2.0(3)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Roefs9.0(1)
- Sels3.7(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Roefs1.4(5)
- Sels1.3(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Roefs 1.4 points per game, Sels 1.3 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Roefs4.5(4)
- Sels3.0(4)
Away
- Roefs1.2(5)
- Sels1.8(5)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Sels 1.8 points per game, Roefs 1.2 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Roefs0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 7 SUN goals
Sels0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 6 NFO goals
Roefs is involved in 0% of SUN's goals, against 0% for Sels.
Who is a rotation risk?
Roefs9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Sels9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Roefs149.0
- Sels138.6
Creativity
- Roefs10.2
- Sels10.0
Threat
- Roefs0.0
- Sels0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Roefs's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Sels's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Roefs−6.6k7.0k out332 in
- Sels−3.8k4.2k out425 in
Managers are selling all of them; Sels the least (−3.8k net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Roefs
- Sels
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Roefs, gameweek 4: 2 points v ARS home, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 4: 3 points v AVL away, 90 minutesGW 5
Roefs, gameweek 5: 0 points v MCI away, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 5: 2 points v COV home, 90 minutesGW 6
Roefs, gameweek 6: 1 points v BHA home, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 6: 2 points v CRY away, 90 minutesGW 7
Roefs, gameweek 7: 2 points v BOU away, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 7: 2 points v ARS home, 90 minutesGW 8
Roefs, gameweek 8: 9 points v LEE home, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 8: 2 points v IPS away, 90 minutesGW 9
Roefs, gameweek 9: 1 points v COV away, 90 minutesSels, gameweek 9: 1 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
Roefs: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Sels: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 |
| 8 | 9 | 2 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 90 |
| 5 | 90 | 90 |
| 6 | 90 | 90 |
| 7 | 90 | 90 |
| 8 | 90 | 90 |
| 9 | 90 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.88 | 0.82 |
| 5 | 2.82 | 0.67 |
| 6 | 1.41 | 2.41 |
| 7 | 4.23 | 1.14 |
| 8 | 0.76 | 0.46 |
| 9 | 0.69 | 0.46 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.8% | 1.4% |
| 5 | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| 6 | 2.3% | 1.5% |
| 7 | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| 8 | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| 9 | 2.2% | 1.4% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 5 | £4.9m | £5.0m |
| 6 | £4.9m | £5.0m |
| 7 | £4.9m | £5.0m |
| 8 | £4.9m | £5.0m |
| 9 | £4.9m | £5.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Roefs | Sels |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.8% | 2.1% |
| 6 | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| 7 | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| 8 | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| 9 | 0.7% | 0.2% |

