How do Marmoush and Strand Larsen compare?

Marmoush has more season points (22 vs 21), Marmoush is more owned (2.7% vs 0.5%), Strand Larsen is cheaper (6.0m vs 7.0m), Marmoush has the higher Start rate (78% vs 56%), Marmoush has more Bonus (3 vs 2), but Marmoush has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

Marmoush

23 stats won

Strand Larsen

7 stats won

Who wins more stats: Marmoush or Strand Larsen?

Marmoush wins 23 of 30 stats

Marmoush wins 23 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Strand Larsen 7.

Points
Marmoush: 22Strand Larsen: 21
xGI (6 gw)
Marmoush: 0.13Strand Larsen: 0.27
Price
Marmoush: £7.0mStrand Larsen: £6.0m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMarmoushStrand Larsen
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form33
Season totals13
Set pieces30
Bonus40
Fixtures10
FPL ranks41
Total237

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Marmoush: Points 22, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 100, Mins (6 gw) 69, xG (6 gw) 0.09, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Strand Larsen: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.27, BPS 95, Mins (6 gw) 51, xG (6 gw) 0.18, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Price

7.0m(best)

6.0m−1.0m vs best

Ownership

2.7%(best)

0.5%−2.2% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.8%(best)

0.0%−0.8% vs best

Availability

Available

75% · Ankle injury - 75% chance of playing

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Marmoush leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Starts

7(best)

5−2 vs best

Start rate

78%(best)

56%−22% vs best

Minutes (season)

589(best)

440−149 vs best

Avg minutes

65(best)

49−16 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Split
Who has better recent form?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Mins (6 gw)

69(best)

51−18 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.09−0.09 vs best

0.18(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.04−0.05 vs best

0.09(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.13−0.14 vs best

0.27(best)

DC (6 gw)

4.50(best)

2.33−2.17 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.65(best)

1.11+0.46 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Strand Larsen leads 3 of 4
Who has scored more this season?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Points

22(best)

21−1 vs best

Goals

1

1

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.88−0.53 vs best

1.41(best)

Total xA

0.33−0.20 vs best

0.53(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Corners & indirect FKs

8th choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

4th choice(best)

—

Penalties

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Marmoush leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
BPS

100(best)

95−5 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

13.3(best)

12.5−0.8 vs best

Bonus

3(best)

2−1 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.5(best)

0.3−0.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Marmoush leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Marmoush leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMarmoushStrand Larsen
Form

3.5(best)

12th FWD · 87th overall

1.8

24th FWD · 222nd overall

ICT index

31.3(best)

16th FWD · 110th overall

22.4

20th FWD · 169th overall

Selected

18th FWD(best)

112th overall

37th FWD

257th overall

Points per game

2.8

18th FWD · 189th overall

3.0(best)

17th FWD · 172nd overall

Cost rank

9th FWD(best)

25th overall

16th FWD

69th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MarmoushTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
  • Strand LarsenCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Marmoush (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Strand Larsen (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Marmoush+0.1Marmoush: 1 goals from 0.88 xG (+0.1)
  • Strand Larsen−0.4Strand Larsen: 1 goals from 1.41 xG (−0.4)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Marmoush−0.3Marmoush: 0 assists from 0.33 xA (−0.3)
  • Strand Larsen+0.5Strand Larsen: 1 assists from 0.53 xA (+0.5)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Marmoush · 22 pts68% from appearances

  • Strand Larsen · 21 pts57% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceMarmoushStrand Larsen
Appearances1512
Goals44
Assists03
Bonus32
Deductions00
Total2221

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Marmoush4.3(3)
  • Strand Larsen8.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Marmoush1.8(4)
  • Strand Larsen2.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Marmoush2.0(1)
  • Strand Larsen2.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Marmoush 2.0 points per game, Strand Larsen 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Marmoush3.4(5)
  • Strand Larsen5.0(3)

Away

  • Marmoush1.7(3)
  • Strand Larsen1.5(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Marmoush 1.7 points per game, Strand Larsen 1.5 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Marmoush10%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • Strand Larsen22%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 9 CRY goals

Strand Larsen is involved in 22% of CRY's goals, against 10% for Marmoush.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Marmoush2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Strand Larsen0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Marmoush71.0
  • Strand Larsen78.4

Creativity

  • Marmoush107.1
  • Strand Larsen38.0

Threat

  • Marmoush137.0
  • Strand Larsen109.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Marmoush's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Strand Larsen's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Marmoush−3.4k12.6k out9.2k in
  • Strand Larsen−3.0k3.1k out80 in

Managers are selling all of them; Strand Larsen the least (−3.0k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Marmoush 3.1 points per £m (22nd), Strand Larsen 3.5 points per £m (17th). Median 2.3.
  • Marmoush
  • Strand Larsen

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Marmoush 18, Strand Larsen 17.

How far ahead is Marmoush? Above zero Marmoush leads; below, Strand Larsen.

Marmoush is 1 point ahead of Strand Larsen over these gameweeks. Marmoush's biggest lead was 1 (GW 9); Strand Larsen's was 10 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Marmoush, gameweek 4: 2 points v EVE home, 76 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 4: 8 points v IPS home, 83 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Marmoush, gameweek 5: 2 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 5: 2 points v LEE away, 81 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Marmoush, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 24 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 6: 5 points v NFO home, 82 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Marmoush, gameweek 7: 9 points v COV home, 86 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 7: 2 points v BHA away, 60 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Marmoush, gameweek 8: 2 points v CHE away, 64 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Marmoush, gameweek 9: 2 points v CRY home, 76 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes

Marmoush: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Strand Larsen: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
428
522
615
792
820
920

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
47683
59081
62482
78660
8640
9760

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
40.020.09
50.020.04
60.000.98
70.060.00
80.300.00
90.140.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
40.030.02
50.040.17
60.000.33
70.030.00
80.000.00
90.150.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
40.050.11
50.060.21
60.001.31
70.090.00
80.300.00
90.290.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
452
543
647
762
830
950

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
401
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
400
500
601
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
42.3%0.7%
52.2%0.6%
62.2%0.7%
72.0%0.7%
81.9%0.6%
92.9%0.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
4£7.0m£6.0m
5£7.0m£6.0m
6£7.0m£6.0m
7£7.0m£6.0m
8£7.0m£6.0m
9£7.0m£6.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMarmoushStrand Larsen
4——
50.3%0.2%
60.1%0.2%
70.2%0.1%
80.2%0.1%
90.8%0.0%