How do Marmoush and Šeško compare?

Marmoush has more season points (22 vs 8), Marmoush is more owned (2.7% vs 1%), Šeško is cheaper (6.9m vs 7.0m), Marmoush has the higher Start rate (78% vs 0%), Marmoush has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Marmoush has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

Marmoush

28 stats won

Šeško

1 stats won

Who wins more stats: Marmoush or Šeško?

Marmoush wins 28 of 29 stats

Marmoush wins 28 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Šeško 1.

Points
Marmoush: 22Šeško: 8
xGI (6 gw)
Marmoush: 0.13Šeško: 0.01
Price
Marmoush: £7.0mŠeško: £6.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMarmoushŠeško
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals30
Set pieces30
Bonus40
Fixtures10
FPL ranks50
Total281

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Marmoush: Points 22, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 100, Mins (6 gw) 69, xG (6 gw) 0.09, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Šeško: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.01, BPS 39, Mins (6 gw) 4, xG (6 gw) 0.01, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Price

7.0m(best)

6.9m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

2.7%(best)

1%−1.7% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.8%(best)

0.0%−0.8% vs best

Availability

Available

0% · Shin injury - Unknown return date

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Marmoush leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Starts

7(best)

0−7 vs best

Start rate

78%(best)

0%−78% vs best

Minutes (season)

589(best)

76−513 vs best

Avg minutes

65(best)

8−57 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Marmoush leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Mins (6 gw)

69(best)

4−65 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.09(best)

0.01−0.08 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.00−0.04 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.13(best)

0.01−0.12 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.50(best)

0.33−4.17 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.65+0.56 vs best

0.09(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3
Who has scored more this season?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Points

22(best)

8−14 vs best

Goals

1

1

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.88(best)

0.39−0.49 vs best

Total xA

0.33(best)

0.01−0.32 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Corners & indirect FKs

8th choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

4th choice(best)

—

Penalties

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Marmoush leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMarmoushŠeško
BPS

100(best)

39−61 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

13.3(best)

0.7−12.6 vs best

Bonus

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.5(best)

0.0−0.5 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Marmoush leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Marmoush leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMarmoushŠeško
Form

3.5(best)

12th FWD · 87th overall

0.0

77th FWD · 664th overall

ICT index

31.3(best)

16th FWD · 110th overall

8.2

35th FWD · 320th overall

Selected

18th FWD(best)

112th overall

26th FWD

181st overall

Points per game

2.8(best)

18th FWD · 189th overall

2.0

31st FWD · 283rd overall

Cost rank

9th FWD(best)

25th overall

11th FWD

28th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MarmoushTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
  • ŠeškoMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Marmoush (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Šeško (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Marmoush+0.1Marmoush: 1 goals from 0.88 xG (+0.1)
  • Šeško+0.6Šeško: 1 goals from 0.39 xG (+0.6)

Šeško has 0.6 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Marmoush−0.3Marmoush: 0 assists from 0.33 xA (−0.3)
  • Šeško±0.0Šeško: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Marmoush · 22 pts68% from appearances

  • Šeško · 8 pts50% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceMarmoushŠeško
Appearances154
Goals44
Bonus30
Deductions00
Total228

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Marmoush4.3(3)
  • Šeško1.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Marmoush1.8(4)
  • Šeško5.0(1)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Marmoush2.0(1)
  • Šeško1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Marmoush 2.0 points per game, Šeško 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Marmoush3.4(5)
  • Šeško1.0(2)

Away

  • Marmoush1.7(3)
  • Šeško3.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Šeško 3.0 points per game, Marmoush 1.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Marmoush10%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • Šeško14%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 7 MUN goals

Šeško is involved in 14% of MUN's goals, against 10% for Marmoush.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Marmoush2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Šeško0 of 9 full games

    4 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Marmoush71.0
  • Šeško34.6

Creativity

  • Marmoush107.1
  • Šeško11.9

Threat

  • Marmoush137.0
  • Šeško36.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Marmoush's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Šeško's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Marmoush−3.4k12.7k out9.3k in
  • Šeško−2.7k2.7k out53 in

Managers are selling all of them; Šeško the least (−2.7k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Marmoush 3.1 points per £m (22nd), Šeško 1.2 points per £m (36th). Median 2.3.
  • Marmoush
  • Šeško

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Marmoush 18, Šeško 1.

How far ahead is Marmoush? Above zero Marmoush leads; below, Šeško.

Marmoush is 17 points ahead of Šeško over these gameweeks. Marmoush's biggest lead was 17 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Marmoush, gameweek 4: 2 points v EVE home, 76 minutes
    Šeško, gameweek 4: 1 points v MCI home, 23 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Marmoush, gameweek 5: 2 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
    Šeško, gameweek 5: 0 points v FUL away, 0 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Marmoush, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 24 minutes
    Šeško, gameweek 6: 0 points v TOT home, 0 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Marmoush, gameweek 7: 9 points v COV home, 86 minutes
    Šeško, gameweek 7: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Marmoush, gameweek 8: 2 points v CHE away, 64 minutes
    Šeško, gameweek 8: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Marmoush, gameweek 9: 2 points v CRY home, 76 minutes
    Šeško, gameweek 9: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

Marmoush: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Šeško: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
421
520
610
790
820
920

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
47623
5900
6240
7860
8640
9760

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
40.020.06
50.020.00
60.000.00
70.060.00
80.300.00
90.140.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
40.030.00
50.040.00
60.000.00
70.030.00
80.000.00
90.150.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
40.050.06
50.060.00
60.000.00
70.090.00
80.300.00
90.290.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
452
540
640
760
830
950

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
400
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
42.3%1.7%
52.2%1.8%
62.2%1.4%
72.0%1.2%
81.9%1.1%
92.9%1.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
4£7.0m£7.0m
5£7.0m£7.0m
6£7.0m£7.0m
7£7.0m£6.9m
8£7.0m£6.9m
9£7.0m£6.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMarmoushŠeško
4——
50.3%0.0%
60.1%0.0%
70.2%0.0%
80.2%0.0%
90.8%0.0%