How do Marmoush and Mateta compare?

Marmoush has more season points (22 vs 3), Marmoush is more owned (2.7% vs 1.2%), Mateta is cheaper (6.3m vs 7.0m), Marmoush has the higher Start rate (78% vs 33%), Marmoush has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Marmoush has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 forwards

Marmoush wins most stats

Spurs

TOT · 7.0m

25 stats won

Crystal Palace

CRY · 6.3m

5 stats won

Who wins more stats: Marmoush or Mateta?

Marmoush wins 25 of 30 stats

Marmoush wins 25 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Mateta 5.

Points: Marmoush: 22Mateta: 3
xGI (6 gw): Marmoush: 0.13Mateta: 0.21
Price: Marmoush: £7.0mMateta: £6.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Marmoush	Mateta
Price & ownership	3	0
Playing time	4	0
Recent form	3	3
Season totals	3	1
Set pieces	2	1
Bonus	4	0
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	5	0
Total	25	5

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Marmoush: Points 22, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 100, Mins (6 gw) 69, xG (6 gw) 0.09, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Mateta: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS -2, Mins (6 gw) 17, xG (6 gw) 0.21, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Price	7.0m(best)	6.3m−0.7m vs best
Ownership	2.7%(best)	1.2%−1.5% vs best

Top 10k ownership	0.8%(best)	0.0%−0.8% vs best

Availability	Available	0% · Suspended until 2 Dec

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Marmoush leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Starts	7(best)	3−4 vs best

Start rate	78%(best)	33%−45% vs best

Minutes (season)	589(best)	164−425 vs best

Avg minutes	65(best)	18−47 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Split

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Mins (6 gw)	69(best)	17−52 vs best

xG (6 gw)	0.09−0.12 vs best	0.21(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.04(best)	0.00−0.04 vs best

xGI (6 gw)	0.13−0.08 vs best	0.21(best)

DC (6 gw)	4.50(best)	1.17−3.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.65+0.33 vs best	0.32(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Marmoush leads 3 of 4

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Points	22(best)	3−19 vs best

Goals	1(best)	0−1 vs best

Assists	0	0
Total xG	0.88−1.08 vs best	1.96(best)

Total xA	0.33(best)	0.04−0.29 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Marmoush leads 2 of 3

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Corners & indirect FKs	8th choice(best)	—
Direct free kicks	4th choice(best)	—
Penalties	2nd choice	1st choice(best)
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Marmoush leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
BPS	100(best)	-2−102 vs best
BPS (6 gw)	13.3(best)	0.2−13.1 vs best

Bonus	3(best)	0−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)	0.5(best)	0.0−0.5 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Marmoush leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Next 5 GWs	LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14	LIV (H) 10 COV (A) 11 HUL (H) 12 CHE (A) 13 AVL (A) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Marmoush leads 5 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Marmoush	Mateta
Form	3.5(best) 12th FWD · 87th overall	0.2 43rd FWD · 386th overall
ICT index	31.3(best) 16th FWD · 110th overall	11.3 29th FWD · 280th overall
Selected	18th FWD(best) 112th overall	23rd FWD 163rd overall
Points per game	2.8(best) 18th FWD · 189th overall	0.8 50th FWD · 444th overall
Cost rank	9th FWD(best) 25th overall	13th FWD 47th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

MarmoushTOT
1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
MatetaCRY
1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Marmoush (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Mateta (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Marmoush+0.1Marmoush: 1 goals from 0.88 xG (+0.1)
Mateta−2.0Mateta: 0 goals from 1.96 xG (−2.0)

Mateta has 2.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Marmoush−0.3Marmoush: 0 assists from 0.33 xA (−0.3)
Mateta±0.0Mateta: 0 assists from 0.04 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Marmoush · 22 pts68% from appearances
Mateta · 3 pts100% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Marmoush	Mateta
Appearances	15	6
Goals	4	0
Bonus	3	0
Deductions	0	−3
Total	22	3

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Marmoush4.3(3)
MatetaNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

Marmoush1.8(4)
Mateta0.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Marmoush2.0(1)
Mateta1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Marmoush 2.0 points per game, Mateta 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Marmoush3.4(5)
Mateta2.0(1)

Away

Marmoush1.7(3)
Mateta0.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Marmoush 1.7 points per game, Mateta 0.3 points per game.

Marmoush10%
1 goal and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals
Mateta
No CRY goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

Marmoush2 of 9 full games
2 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play
Mateta0 of 9 full games
2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Marmoush71.0
Mateta7.0

Creativity

Marmoush107.1
Mateta23.9

Threat

Marmoush137.0
Mateta84.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Marmoush's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Mateta's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Marmoush−3.4k12.6k out9.2k in
Mateta−4.4k4.9k out451 in

Managers are selling all of them; Marmoush the least (−3.4k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Marmoush 3.1 points per £m (22nd), Mateta 0.5 points per £m (46th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Marmoush
Mateta

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Marmoush 18, Mateta 1.

How far ahead is Marmoush? Above zero Marmoush leads; below, Mateta.

Marmoush is 17 points ahead of Mateta over these gameweeks. Marmoush's biggest lead was 17 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Marmoush, gameweek 4: 2 points v EVE home, 76 minutes
Mateta, gameweek 4: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
GW 5
Marmoush, gameweek 5: 2 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
Mateta, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
GW 6
Marmoush, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 24 minutes
Mateta, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
GW 7
Marmoush, gameweek 7: 9 points v COV home, 86 minutes
Mateta, gameweek 7: 1 points v BHA away, 29 minutes
GW 8
Marmoush, gameweek 8: 2 points v CHE away, 64 minutes
Mateta, gameweek 8: 2 points v NEW home, 61 minutes
GW 9
Marmoush, gameweek 9: 2 points v CRY home, 76 minutes
Mateta, gameweek 9: -2 points v TOT away, 12 minutes

Marmoush: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Mateta: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	2	0
5	2	0
6	1	0
7	9	1
8	2	2
9	2	-2

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	76	0
5	90	0
6	24	0
7	86	29
8	64	61
9	76	12

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	0.02	0.00
5	0.02	0.00
6	0.00	0.00
7	0.06	0.46
8	0.30	0.80
9	0.14	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	0.03	0.00
5	0.04	0.00
6	0.00	0.00
7	0.03	0.01
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.15	0.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	0.05	0.00
5	0.06	0.00
6	0.00	0.00
7	0.09	0.47
8	0.30	0.80
9	0.29	0.01

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	5	0
5	4	0
6	4	0
7	6	4
8	3	1
9	5	2

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	1	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	2.3%	1.6%
5	2.2%	1.4%
6	2.2%	1.2%
7	2.0%	1.2%
8	1.9%	1.2%
9	2.9%	1.2%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	£7.0m	£6.4m
5	£7.0m	£6.3m
6	£7.0m	£6.3m
7	£7.0m	£6.3m
8	£7.0m	£6.3m
9	£7.0m	£6.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Marmoush	Mateta
4	—	—
5	0.3%	0.0%
6	0.1%	0.0%
7	0.2%	0.0%
8	0.2%	0.0%
9	0.8%	0.0%