How do Marmoush and McBurnie compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 22), Marmoush is more owned (2.7% vs 1.7%), McBurnie is cheaper (5.5m vs 7.0m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 78%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 3), but Marmoush has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Marmoush

11 stats won

McBurnie

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Marmoush or McBurnie?

McBurnie wins 20 of 31 stats

McBurnie wins 20 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Marmoush 11.

Points
Marmoush: 22McBurnie: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Marmoush: 0.13McBurnie: 0.31
Price
Marmoush: £7.0mMcBurnie: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMarmoushMcBurnie
Price & ownership30
Playing time04
Recent form33
Season totals14
Set pieces12
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks23
Total1120

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Marmoush: Points 22, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 100, Mins (6 gw) 69, xG (6 gw) 0.09, Upcoming FDR 2.80. McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Marmoush leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Price

7.0m(best)

5.5m−1.5m vs best

Ownership

2.7%(best)

1.7%−1.0% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.8%(best)

0.6%−0.2% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Starts

7−2 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

78%−22% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

589−207 vs best

796(best)

Avg minutes

65−23 vs best

88(best)

Who has better recent form?

Split
Who has better recent form?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Mins (6 gw)

69−19 vs best

88(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.09−0.19 vs best

0.28(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.03−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.13−0.18 vs best

0.31(best)

DC (6 gw)

4.50(best)

4.17−0.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.65(best)

1.33+0.68 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Points

22−14 vs best

36(best)

Goals

1−1 vs best

2(best)

Assists

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Total xG

0.88−1.34 vs best

2.22(best)

Total xA

0.33(best)

0.24−0.09 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 2 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Corners & indirect FKs

8th choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

4th choice

2nd choice(best)

Penalties

2nd choice

1st choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
BPS

100−33 vs best

133(best)

BPS (6 gw)

13.3−3.9 vs best

17.2(best)

Bonus

3−2 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.5−0.3 vs best

0.8(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Marmoush leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMarmoushMcBurnie
Form

3.5

12th FWD · 87th overall

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

ICT index

31.3

16th FWD · 110th overall

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

Selected

18th FWD(best)

112th overall

20th FWD

135th overall

Points per game

2.8

18th FWD · 189th overall

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

Cost rank

9th FWD(best)

25th overall

33rd FWD

125th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MarmoushTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Marmoush (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Marmoush+0.1Marmoush: 1 goals from 0.88 xG (+0.1)
  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Marmoush−0.3Marmoush: 0 assists from 0.33 xA (−0.3)
  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Marmoush · 22 pts68% from appearances

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceMarmoushMcBurnie
Appearances1518
Goals48
Assists09
Bonus35
Deductions0−4
Total2236

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Marmoush4.3(3)
  • McBurnie6.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Marmoush1.8(4)
  • McBurnie3.2(6)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Marmoush2.0(1)
  • McBurnie4.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Marmoush 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Marmoush3.4(5)
  • McBurnie5.6(5)

Away

  • Marmoush1.7(3)
  • McBurnie2.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: McBurnie 2.0 points per game, Marmoush 1.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Marmoush10%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 10% for Marmoush.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Marmoush2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Marmoush71.0
  • McBurnie150.4

Creativity

  • Marmoush107.1
  • McBurnie104.4

Threat

  • Marmoush137.0
  • McBurnie156.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Marmoush's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Marmoush−3.4k12.6k out9.2k in
  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.5k in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Marmoush 3.1 points per £m (22nd), McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Marmoush
  • McBurnie

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Marmoush 18.

How far ahead is Marmoush? Above zero Marmoush leads; below, McBurnie.

McBurnie is 10 points ahead of Marmoush over these gameweeks. Marmoush's biggest lead was 6 (GW 7); McBurnie's was 10 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Marmoush, gameweek 4: 2 points v EVE home, 76 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Marmoush, gameweek 5: 2 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Marmoush, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 24 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Marmoush, gameweek 7: 9 points v COV home, 86 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Marmoush, gameweek 8: 2 points v CHE away, 64 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Marmoush, gameweek 9: 2 points v CRY home, 76 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

Marmoush: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
424
521
611
792
828
9212

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
47681
59090
62490
78690
86485
97690

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
40.020.33
50.020.36
60.000.00
70.060.00
80.300.79
90.140.20

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
40.030.04
50.040.02
60.000.09
70.030.00
80.000.01
90.150.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
40.050.37
50.060.38
60.000.09
70.090.00
80.300.80
90.290.21

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
453
546
645
763
833
955

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
400
500
600
710
801
901

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
401
500
600
700
800
901

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
42.3%1.9%
52.2%2.0%
62.2%1.9%
72.0%1.8%
81.9%1.6%
92.9%1.7%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
4£7.0m£5.5m
5£7.0m£5.5m
6£7.0m£5.5m
7£7.0m£5.5m
8£7.0m£5.5m
9£7.0m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMarmoushMcBurnie
4——
50.3%0.4%
60.1%0.3%
70.2%0.2%
80.2%0.2%
90.8%0.6%