How do Lacroix and Tarkowski compare?

Tarkowski has more season points (54 vs 24), Tarkowski is more owned (19% vs 5.1%), Lacroix is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.2m), Tarkowski has the higher Start rate (100% vs 78%), Tarkowski has more Bonus (7 vs 0), but Lacroix has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 defenders

Tarkowski wins most stats

Chelsea

CHE · 5.9m

6 stats won

Everton

EVE · 6.2m

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Lacroix or Tarkowski?

Tarkowski wins 22 of 28 stats

Tarkowski wins 22 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Lacroix 6.

Points: Lacroix: 24Tarkowski: 54
xGI (6 gw): Lacroix: 0.07Tarkowski: 0.02
Price: Lacroix: £5.9mTarkowski: £6.2m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Price & ownership	0	3
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	3	3
Season totals	2	4
Set pieces	0	0
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	0	4
Total	6	22

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Lacroix: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 76, Mins (6 gw) 61, DC (6 gw) 6.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Tarkowski: Points 54, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 195, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 10.5, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tarkowski leads 3 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Price	5.9m−0.3m vs best	6.2m(best)
Ownership	5.1%−14% vs best	19%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.1%−9.2% vs best	9.3%(best)

Availability	0% · Hamstring injury - Unknown return date	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tarkowski leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Starts	7−2 vs best	9(best)

Start rate	78%−22% vs best	100%(best)

Minutes (season)	634−176 vs best	810(best)

Avg minutes	70−20 vs best	90(best)

Who has better recent form?

Split

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Mins (6 gw)	61−29 vs best	90(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.06(best)	0.00−0.06 vs best

xA (6 gw)	0.00−0.01 vs best	0.01(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.07(best)	0.02−0.05 vs best

DC (6 gw)	6.83−3.67 vs best	10.50(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.95(best)	1.36+0.41 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Tarkowski leads 4 of 6

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Points	24−30 vs best	54(best)

Goals	0−1 vs best	1(best)

Assists	1	1
Total xG	0.40(best)	0.18−0.22 vs best

Total xA	0.22(best)	0.11−0.11 vs best

DC (season)	73−21 vs best	94(best)

Clean sheets	1−3 vs best	4(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Corners & indirect FKs	—	—
Direct free kicks	—	—
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tarkowski leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
BPS	76−119 vs best	195(best)

BPS (6 gw)	8.5−13.5 vs best	22.0(best)

Bonus	0−7 vs best	7(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.8 vs best	0.8(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Lacroix leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Next 5 GWs	SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14	COV (H) 10 BRE (A) 11 LIV (H) 12 AVL (A) 13 FUL (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tarkowski leads 4 of 4

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Form	2.8 48th DEF · 135th overall	2.8 49th DEF · 136th overall
ICT index	20.7 62nd DEF · 185th overall	34.7(best) 25th DEF · 87th overall
Selected	24th DEF 68th overall	7th DEF(best) 21st overall
Points per game	3.0 69th DEF · 170th overall	6.0(best) 7th DEF · 17th overall
Cost rank	7th DEF 82nd overall	4th DEF(best) 51st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

LacroixCHE
1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
TarkowskiEVE
1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Lacroix (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Tarkowski (EVE) 0.6 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Lacroix−0.4Lacroix: 0 goals from 0.40 xG (−0.4)
Tarkowski+0.8Tarkowski: 1 goals from 0.18 xG (+0.8)

Tarkowski has 0.8 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Lacroix+0.8Lacroix: 1 assists from 0.22 xA (+0.8)
Tarkowski+0.9Tarkowski: 1 assists from 0.11 xA (+0.9)

Tarkowski has 0.9 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

Lacroix+2.5Lacroix: 13 conceded from 10.48 xGC (+2.5)
Tarkowski−4.0Tarkowski: 9 conceded from 12.99 xGC (−4.0)

Lacroix has conceded 2.5 more than xGC; Tarkowski has conceded 4.0 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Lacroix · 24 pts50% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Tarkowski · 54 pts30% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Lacroix	Tarkowski
Appearances	15	18
Goals	0	6
Assists	3	3
Clean sheets	4	16
Defensive contribution	8	10
Bonus	0	7
Deductions	−6	−6
Total	24	54

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Lacroix1.0(1)
Tarkowski7.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

Lacroix4.3(4)
Tarkowski5.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Lacroix2.0(3)
Tarkowski4.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tarkowski 4.7 points per game, Lacroix 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Lacroix1.8(4)
Tarkowski5.8(4)

Away

Lacroix4.3(4)
Tarkowski6.2(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tarkowski 6.2 points per game, Lacroix 4.3 points per game.

Lacroix6%
0 goals and 1 assist of 17 CHE goals
Tarkowski22%
1 goal and 1 assist of 9 EVE goals

Tarkowski is involved in 22% of EVE's goals, against 6% for Lacroix.

Who is a rotation risk?

Lacroix7 of 9 full games
7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play
Tarkowski9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Lacroix170.6
Tarkowski259.0

Creativity

Lacroix15.1
Tarkowski51.8

Threat

Lacroix21.0
Tarkowski36.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Lacroix's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Tarkowski's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Lacroix−51.8k51.9k out72 in
Tarkowski+12.9k21.6k out34.5k in

Tarkowski has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+12.9k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Lacroix 4.1 points per £m (68th), Tarkowski 8.7 points per £m (10th). Median 3.2.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Lacroix
Tarkowski

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tarkowski 33, Lacroix 15.

How far ahead is Lacroix? Above zero Lacroix leads; below, Tarkowski.

Tarkowski is 18 points ahead of Lacroix over these gameweeks. Tarkowski's was 19 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Lacroix, gameweek 4: 1 points v HUL home, 4 minutes
Tarkowski, gameweek 4: 8 points v TOT away, 90 minutes
GW 5
Lacroix, gameweek 5: 3 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
Tarkowski, gameweek 5: 14 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
GW 6
Lacroix, gameweek 6: 2 points v BOU home, 90 minutes
Tarkowski, gameweek 6: 3 points v HUL away, 90 minutes
GW 7
Lacroix, gameweek 7: 6 points v EVE away, 90 minutes
Tarkowski, gameweek 7: 0 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
GW 8
Lacroix, gameweek 8: 3 points v TOT home, 90 minutes
Tarkowski, gameweek 8: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
GW 9
Lacroix, gameweek 9: 0 points v MUN home, 0 minutes
Tarkowski, gameweek 9: 6 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

Lacroix: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Tarkowski: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	1	8
5	3	14
6	2	3
7	6	0
8	3	2
9	0	6

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	4	90
5	90	90
6	90	90
7	90	90
8	90	90
9	0	90

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	0.00	0.00
5	0.13	0.01
6	0.00	0.00
7	0.25	0.00
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	0.00	0.01
5	0.01	0.01
6	0.00	0.01
7	0.00	0.05
8	0.00	0.01
9	0.00	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	0.00	0.01
5	0.14	0.02
6	0.00	0.01
7	0.25	0.05
8	0.00	0.01
9	0.00	0.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	3	8
5	12	12
6	8	17
7	8	7
8	10	10
9	0	9

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	0.49	0.69
5	2.65	1.44
6	1.38	1.33
7	0.43	1.47
8	0.74	1.96
9	0.00	1.29

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	0	0
5	0	1
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	8.1%	11.6%
5	6.9%	14.9%
6	6.7%	18.9%
7	6.3%	18.5%
8	6.3%	18.1%
9	5.6%	19.2%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	£6.0m	£6.0m
5	£6.0m	£6.1m
6	£5.9m	£6.2m
7	£5.9m	£6.2m
8	£5.9m	£6.2m
9	£5.9m	£6.2m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Lacroix	Tarkowski
4	—	—
5	0.2%	30.9%
6	0.1%	16.5%
7	0.1%	11.1%
8	0.1%	8.9%
9	0.1%	9.3%