How do Lacroix and Matheus N. compare?

Lacroix has more season points (24 vs 21), Lacroix is more owned (5.1% vs 0.9%), Lacroix has the higher Start rate (78% vs 56%), Matheus N. has more Bonus (1 vs 0), but Lacroix has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

Lacroix

20 stats won

Matheus N.

9 stats won

Who wins more stats: Lacroix or Matheus N.?

Lacroix wins 20 of 29 stats

Lacroix wins 20 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Matheus N. 9.

Points
Lacroix: 24Matheus N.: 21
xGI (6 gw)
Lacroix: 0.07Matheus N.: 0.05
Price
Lacroix: £5.9mMatheus N.: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionLacroixMatheus N.
Price & ownership20
Playing time40
Recent form42
Season totals51
Set pieces01
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks41
Total209

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Lacroix: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 76, Mins (6 gw) 61, DC (6 gw) 6.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Matheus N.: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.05, BPS 85, Mins (6 gw) 73, DC (6 gw) 5.5, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Lacroix leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Price

5.9m

5.9m

Ownership

5.1%(best)

0.9%−4.2% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.1%(best)

0.0%−0.1% vs best

Availability

0% · Hamstring injury - Unknown return date

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Lacroix leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Starts

7(best)

5−2 vs best

Start rate

78%(best)

56%−22% vs best

Minutes (season)

634(best)

468−166 vs best

Avg minutes

70(best)

52−18 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Lacroix leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Mins (6 gw)

61−12 vs best

73(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.06(best)

0.02−0.04 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.03 vs best

0.03(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.07(best)

0.05−0.02 vs best

DC (6 gw)

6.83(best)

5.50−1.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.95(best)

1.24+0.29 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Lacroix leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Points

24(best)

21−3 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Total xG

0.40(best)

0.15−0.25 vs best

Total xA

0.22(best)

0.21−0.01 vs best

DC (season)

73(best)

34−39 vs best

Clean sheets

1−1 vs best

2(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Matheus N. leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

4th choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Matheus N. leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
BPS

76−9 vs best

85(best)

BPS (6 gw)

8.5−5.0 vs best

13.5(best)

Bonus

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.2 vs best

0.2(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Lacroix leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Next 5 GWs

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.20+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Lacroix leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatLacroixMatheus N.
Form

2.8(best)

48th DEF · 135th overall

2.5

57th DEF · 160th overall

ICT index

20.7(best)

62nd DEF · 185th overall

15.6

85th DEF · 235th overall

Selected

24th DEF(best)

68th overall

74th DEF

189th overall

Points per game

3.0

69th DEF · 170th overall

3.5(best)

54th DEF · 125th overall

Cost rank

7th DEF(best)

82nd overall

9th DEF

86th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • LacroixCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • Matheus N.MCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Matheus N. (MCI) 0.8 expected clean sheets, Lacroix (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Lacroix−0.4Lacroix: 0 goals from 0.40 xG (−0.4)
  • Matheus N.−0.1Matheus N.: 0 goals from 0.15 xG (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Lacroix+0.8Lacroix: 1 assists from 0.22 xA (+0.8)
  • Matheus N.−0.2Matheus N.: 0 assists from 0.21 xA (−0.2)

Lacroix has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Lacroix+2.5Lacroix: 13 conceded from 10.48 xGC (+2.5)
  • Matheus N.−2.6Matheus N.: 5 conceded from 7.57 xGC (−2.6)

Lacroix has conceded 2.5 more than xGC; Matheus N. has conceded 2.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Lacroix · 24 pts50% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Matheus N. · 21 pts50% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceLacroixMatheus N.
Appearances1511
Assists30
Clean sheets48
Defensive contribution82
Bonus01
Deductions−6−1
Total2421

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Lacroix1.0(1)
  • Matheus N.1.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Lacroix4.3(4)
  • Matheus N.5.0(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Lacroix2.0(3)
  • Matheus N.4.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Matheus N. 4.0 points per game, Lacroix 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Lacroix1.8(4)
  • Matheus N.1.5(4)

Away

  • Lacroix4.3(4)
  • Matheus N.7.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Matheus N. 7.5 points per game, Lacroix 4.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Lacroix6%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 17 CHE goals

  • Matheus N.0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 14 MCI goals

Lacroix is involved in 6% of CHE's goals, against 0% for Matheus N..

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Lacroix7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Matheus N.4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Lacroix170.6
  • Matheus N.95.4

Creativity

  • Lacroix15.1
  • Matheus N.31.7

Threat

  • Lacroix21.0
  • Matheus N.29.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Lacroix's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Matheus N.'s biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Lacroix−53.3k53.4k out76 in
  • Matheus N.+407966 out1.4k in

Matheus N. has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+407).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Lacroix 4.1 points per £m (68th), Matheus N. 3.6 points per £m (77th). Median 3.3.
  • Lacroix
  • Matheus N.

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Matheus N. 20, Lacroix 15.

How far ahead is Lacroix? Above zero Lacroix leads; below, Matheus N..

Matheus N. is 5 points ahead of Lacroix over these gameweeks. Matheus N.'s was 10 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Lacroix, gameweek 4: 1 points v HUL home, 4 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 4: 9 points v MUN away, 90 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Lacroix, gameweek 5: 3 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 5: 1 points v SUN home, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Lacroix, gameweek 6: 2 points v BOU home, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 6: 6 points v LIV away, 90 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Lacroix, gameweek 7: 6 points v EVE away, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 7: 2 points v IPS home, 75 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Lacroix, gameweek 8: 3 points v TOT home, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 8: 0 points v AVL away, 0 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Lacroix, gameweek 9: 0 points v MUN home, 0 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 9: 2 points v BHA home, 90 minutes

Lacroix: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Matheus N.: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
419
531
626
762
830
902

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
4490
59090
69090
79075
8900
9090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
40.000.00
50.130.00
60.000.00
70.250.00
80.000.00
90.000.15

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
40.000.01
50.010.01
60.000.01
70.000.03
80.000.00
90.000.11

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
40.000.01
50.140.01
60.000.01
70.250.03
80.000.00
90.000.26

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
4311
5129
685
783
8100
905

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
40.491.00
52.653.57
61.380.94
70.430.96
80.740.00
90.001.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
48.1%0.9%
56.9%1.0%
66.7%1.0%
76.3%1.1%
86.3%1.0%
95.6%0.9%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
4£6.0m£5.9m
5£6.0m£5.9m
6£5.9m£5.9m
7£5.9m£5.9m
8£5.9m£5.9m
9£5.9m£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWLacroixMatheus N.
4——
50.2%0.0%
60.1%0.0%
70.1%0.1%
80.1%0.0%
90.1%0.0%