How do Havertz and McBurnie compare?
McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 33), Havertz is more owned (5.7% vs 1.7%), McBurnie is cheaper (5.5m vs 7.4m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), but Havertz has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.20 vs 3.60).
Comparing 2 forwards
McBurnie wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Havertz or McBurnie?
McBurnie wins 17 of 29 stats
McBurnie wins 17 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Havertz 12.
- Points
- Havertz: 33McBurnie: 36
- xGI (6 gw)
- Havertz: 0.39McBurnie: 0.31
- Price
- Havertz: £7.4mMcBurnie: £5.5m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 3 | 3 |
| Season totals | 3 | 2 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 2 |
| Bonus | 0 | 3 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 12 | 17 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Havertz leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 7.4m(best) | 5.5m−1.9m vs best |
| Ownership | 5.7%(best) | 1.7%−4.0% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.1%−0.5% vs best | 0.6%(best) |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
McBurnie leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 8−1 vs best | 9(best) |
| Start rate | 89%−11% vs best | 100%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 669−127 vs best | 796(best) |
| Avg minutes | 74−14 vs best | 88(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 69−19 vs best | 88(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.37(best) | 0.28−0.09 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.02−0.01 vs best | 0.03(best) |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.39(best) | 0.31−0.08 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 2.67−1.50 vs best | 4.17(best) |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.88(best) | 1.33+0.45 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Havertz leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 33−3 vs best | 36(best) |
| Goals | 3(best) | 2−1 vs best |
| Assists | 0−3 vs best | 3(best) |
| Total xG | 2.78(best) | 2.22−0.56 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.43(best) | 0.24−0.19 vs best |
See alsoForward stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
McBurnie leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | 2nd choice(best) |
| Penalties | — | 1st choice(best) |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
McBurnie leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 128−5 vs best | 133(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 8.5−8.7 vs best | 17.2(best) |
| Bonus | 5 | 5 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.5−0.3 vs best | 0.8(best) |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Havertz leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | HUL (H) 10 NEW (A) 11 MCI (H) 12 BRE (A) 13 TOT (A) 14 | ARS (A) 10 BHA (H) 11 CRY (A) 12 NFO (H) 13 BOU (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.20(best) | 3.60+0.40 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Havertz leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 3.5 13th FWD · 88th overall | 5.8(best) 4th FWD · 21st overall |
| ICT index | 46.0(best) 9th FWD · 40th overall | 41.1 11th FWD · 57th overall |
| Selected | 11th FWD(best) 64th overall | 20th FWD 135th overall |
| Points per game | 3.7 13th FWD · 116th overall | 4.0(best) 9th FWD · 91st overall |
| Cost rank | 6th FWD(best) 19th overall | 33rd FWD 125th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
HavertzARS
- ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.79 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
- ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
McBurnieHUL
- HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
- HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Havertz (ARS) 4.6 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Havertz+0.2Havertz: 3 goals from 2.78 xG (+0.2)
- McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Assists vs xA
- Havertz−0.4Havertz: 0 assists from 0.43 xA (−0.4)
- McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)
McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Havertz · 33 pts50% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 17 | 18 |
| Goals | 12 | 8 |
| Assists | 0 | 9 |
| Bonus | 5 | 5 |
| Deductions | −1 | −4 |
| Total | 33 | 36 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Havertz4.0(2)
- McBurnie6.5(2)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Havertz1.5(4)
- McBurnie3.2(6)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Havertz6.3(3)
- McBurnie4.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Havertz 6.3 points per game, McBurnie 4.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Havertz4.3(4)
- McBurnie5.6(5)
Away
- Havertz3.2(5)
- McBurnie2.0(4)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Havertz 3.2 points per game, McBurnie 2.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Havertz21%
3 goals and 0 assists of 14 ARS goals
McBurnie45%
2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals
McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 21% for Havertz.
Who is a rotation risk?
Havertz4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59
McBurnie7 of 9 full games
7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Havertz137.4
- McBurnie150.4
Creativity
- Havertz86.7
- McBurnie104.4
Threat
- Havertz237.0
- McBurnie156.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Havertz's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Havertz+22.7k10.1k out32.7k in
- McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.5k in
Havertz has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+22.7k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Havertz
- McBurnie
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Havertz, gameweek 4: 1 points v SUN away, 90 minutesMcBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutesGW 5
Havertz, gameweek 5: 2 points v BHA away, 90 minutesMcBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutesGW 6
Havertz, gameweek 6: 2 points v LEE home, 62 minutesMcBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutesGW 7
Havertz, gameweek 7: 2 points v NFO away, 65 minutesMcBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutesGW 8
Havertz, gameweek 8: 1 points v EVE home, 22 minutesMcBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutesGW 9
Havertz, gameweek 9: 9 points v LIV away, 83 minutesMcBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
Havertz: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 |
| 8 | 1 | 8 |
| 9 | 9 | 12 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 81 |
| 5 | 90 | 90 |
| 6 | 62 | 90 |
| 7 | 65 | 90 |
| 8 | 22 | 85 |
| 9 | 83 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.36 |
| 6 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| 9 | 0.64 | 0.20 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| 5 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.09 |
| 7 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.36 | 0.37 |
| 5 | 0.80 | 0.38 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| 7 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| 9 | 0.65 | 0.21 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 5 | 3 | 6 |
| 6 | 0 | 5 |
| 7 | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | 2 | 3 |
| 9 | 8 | 5 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 8.2% | 1.9% |
| 5 | 8.5% | 2.0% |
| 6 | 6.6% | 1.9% |
| 7 | 6.5% | 1.8% |
| 8 | 6.0% | 1.6% |
| 9 | 5.4% | 1.7% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £7.5m | £5.5m |
| 5 | £7.6m | £5.5m |
| 6 | £7.6m | £5.5m |
| 7 | £7.5m | £5.5m |
| 8 | £7.5m | £5.5m |
| 9 | £7.4m | £5.5m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Havertz | McBurnie |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| 6 | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| 7 | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| 8 | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 0.1% | 0.6% |

