How do Garner and Manzambi compare?

Manzambi has more season points (38 vs 23), Manzambi is more owned (7.1% vs 0.2%), Garner is cheaper (6.0m vs 6.1m), Garner has the higher Start rate (89% vs 56%), Manzambi has more Bonus (7 vs 0), but Manzambi has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.00).

Garner

11 stats won

Manzambi

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Garner or Manzambi?

Manzambi wins 20 of 31 stats

Manzambi wins 20 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Garner 11.

Points
Garner: 23Manzambi: 38
xGI (6 gw)
Garner: 0.18Manzambi: 0.36
Price
Garner: £6.0mManzambi: £6.1m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionGarnerManzambi
Price & ownership03
Playing time40
Recent form23
Season totals24
Set pieces30
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks05
Total1120

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Garner: Points 23, xGI (6 gw) 0.18, BPS 132, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 11.7, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Manzambi: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.36, BPS 138, Mins (6 gw) 64, DC (6 gw) 4.7, Upcoming FDR 2.40.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Manzambi leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatGarnerManzambi
Price

6.0m−0.1m vs best

6.1m(best)

Ownership

0.2%−6.9% vs best

7.1%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.1%−34.5% vs best

34.6%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Garner leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatGarnerManzambi
Starts

8(best)

5−3 vs best

Start rate

89%(best)

56%−33% vs best

Minutes (season)

688(best)

384−304 vs best

Avg minutes

76(best)

43−33 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Manzambi leads 3 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatGarnerManzambi
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

64−26 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.08−0.19 vs best

0.27(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.10

0.10

xGI (6 gw)

0.18−0.18 vs best

0.36(best)

DC (6 gw)

11.67(best)

4.67−7.00 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.36+0.35 vs best

1.01(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Manzambi leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatGarnerManzambi
Points

23−15 vs best

38(best)

Goals

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Assists

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Total xG

0.48−1.12 vs best

1.60(best)

Total xA

0.68(best)

0.58−0.10 vs best

DC (season)

89(best)

28−61 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Garner leads 3 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatGarnerManzambi
Corners & indirect FKs

1st choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

1st choice(best)

2nd choice

Penalties

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Manzambi leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatGarnerManzambi
BPS

132−6 vs best

138(best)

BPS (6 gw)

16.3−6.7 vs best

23.0(best)

Bonus

0−7 vs best

7(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−1.2 vs best

1.2(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Manzambi leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatGarnerManzambi
Next 5 GWs

COV

(H)

10

BRE

(A)

11

LIV

(H)

12

AVL

(A)

13

FUL

(H)

14

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.60 vs best

2.40(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Manzambi leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatGarnerManzambi
Form

3.0

48th MID · 117th overall

6.0(best)

6th MID · 17th overall

ICT index

30.4

67th MID · 119th overall

43.6(best)

34th MID · 51st overall

Selected

113th MID

322nd overall

15th MID(best)

49th overall

Points per game

2.6

89th MID · 204th overall

6.3(best)

2nd MID · 8th overall

Cost rank

46th MID

68th overall

45th MID(best)

65th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • GarnerEVE

    1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
    2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
  • ManzambiAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Manzambi (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals, Garner (EVE) 2.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Garner−0.5Garner: 0 goals from 0.48 xG (−0.5)
  • Manzambi+0.4Manzambi: 2 goals from 1.60 xG (+0.4)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Garner−0.7Garner: 0 assists from 0.68 xA (−0.7)
  • Manzambi+2.4Manzambi: 3 assists from 0.58 xA (+2.4)

Garner has 0.7 fewer assists than xA; Manzambi has 2.4 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Garner · 23 pts65% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Manzambi · 38 pts29% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceGarnerManzambi
Appearances1711
Goals010
Assists09
Clean sheets31
Defensive contribution60
Bonus07
Deductions−30
Total2338

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Garner2.7(3)
  • Manzambi7.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Garner3.0(3)
  • Manzambi7.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Garner2.0(3)
  • Manzambi1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Garner 2.0 points per game, Manzambi 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Garner2.0(4)
  • Manzambi3.5(4)

Away

  • Garner3.0(5)
  • Manzambi12.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Manzambi 12.0 points per game, Garner 3.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Garner0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 9 EVE goals

  • Manzambi50%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 10 AVL goals

Manzambi is involved in 50% of AVL's goals, against 0% for Garner.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Garner6 of 9 full games

    6 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

  • Manzambi0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Garner120.6
  • Manzambi161.6

Creativity

  • Garner149.3
  • Manzambi106.7

Threat

  • Garner32.0
  • Manzambi168.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Garner's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Manzambi's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Garner+414618 out1.0k in
  • Manzambi+96.9k6.0k out103k in

Manzambi has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+96.9k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Garner 3.8 points per £m (75th), Manzambi 6.2 points per £m (17th). Median 2.5.
  • Garner
  • Manzambi

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Manzambi 38, Garner 19.

How far ahead is Garner? Above zero Garner leads; below, Manzambi.

Manzambi is 19 points ahead of Garner over these gameweeks. Garner's biggest lead was 3 (GW 4); Manzambi's was 19 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Garner, gameweek 4: 4 points v TOT away, 90 minutes
    Manzambi, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 27 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Garner, gameweek 5: 3 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
    Manzambi, gameweek 5: 13 points v TOT away, 71 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Garner, gameweek 6: 4 points v HUL away, 90 minutes
    Manzambi, gameweek 6: 5 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Garner, gameweek 7: 2 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
    Manzambi, gameweek 7: 11 points v NEW away, 71 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Garner, gameweek 8: 3 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Manzambi, gameweek 8: 1 points v MCI home, 65 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Garner, gameweek 9: 3 points v NEW away, 90 minutes
    Manzambi, gameweek 9: 7 points v FUL home, 65 minutes

Garner: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Manzambi: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
441
5313
645
7211
831
937

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
49027
59071
69085
79071
89065
99065

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
40.040.00
50.160.44
60.040.54
70.000.45
80.030.07
90.210.10

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
40.020.08
50.040.16
60.310.16
70.020.17
80.080.00
90.100.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
40.060.08
50.200.60
60.350.70
70.020.62
80.110.07
90.310.11

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
4172
597
6124
783
8136
9116

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
400
501
600
701
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
400
501
601
700
800
901

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
40.1%0.1%
50.2%0.1%
60.2%0.8%
70.2%2.1%
80.2%3.0%
90.2%7.4%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
4£6.0m£5.9m
5£6.0m£5.9m
6£6.0m£5.9m
7£6.0m£5.9m
8£6.0m£6.0m
9£6.0m£6.1m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWGarnerManzambi
4——
50.4%0.0%
60.1%0.4%
70.1%6.4%
80.2%7.8%
90.1%34.6%