How do Garner and Hinshelwood compare?

Hinshelwood has more season points (24 vs 23), Hinshelwood is more owned (0.6% vs 0.2%), Hinshelwood is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.0m), Garner has the higher Start rate (89% vs 11%), Hinshelwood has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Hinshelwood has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Garner wins most stats

Everton

EVE · 6.0m

18 stats won

Brighton

BHA · 5.9m

11 stats won

Who wins more stats: Garner or Hinshelwood?

Garner wins 18 of 29 stats

Garner wins 18 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Hinshelwood 11.

Points: Garner: 23Hinshelwood: 24
xGI (6 gw): Garner: 0.18Hinshelwood: 0.18
Price: Garner: £6.0mHinshelwood: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Garner	Hinshelwood
Price & ownership	1	2
Playing time	4	0
Recent form	3	2
Season totals	2	3
Set pieces	3	0
Bonus	2	1
Fixtures	0	1
FPL ranks	3	2
Total	18	11

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Garner: Points 23, xGI (6 gw) 0.18, BPS 132, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 11.7, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Hinshelwood: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.18, BPS 81, Mins (6 gw) 14, DC (6 gw) 1.5, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Hinshelwood leads 2 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Price	6.0m(best)	5.9m−0.1m vs best
Ownership	0.2%−0.4% vs best	0.6%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.1%−0.1% vs best	0.2%(best)

Availability	Available	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Garner leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Starts	8(best)	1−7 vs best

Start rate	89%(best)	11%−78% vs best

Minutes (season)	688(best)	145−543 vs best

Avg minutes	76(best)	16−60 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Garner leads 3 of 5

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Mins (6 gw)	90(best)	14−76 vs best

xG (6 gw)	0.08−0.10 vs best	0.18(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.10(best)	0.01−0.09 vs best

xGI (6 gw)	0.18	0.18
DC (6 gw)	11.67(best)	1.50−10.17 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	1.36+1.18 vs best	0.18(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Hinshelwood leads 3 of 5

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Points	23−1 vs best	24(best)

Goals	0−3 vs best	3(best)

Assists	0	0
Total xG	0.48−1.99 vs best	2.47(best)

Total xA	0.68(best)	0.06−0.62 vs best

DC (season)	89(best)	12−77 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Garner leads 3 of 3

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Corners & indirect FKs	1st choice(best)	—
Direct free kicks	1st choice(best)	—
Penalties	2nd choice(best)	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Garner leads 2 of 3

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
BPS	132(best)	81−51 vs best

BPS (6 gw)	16.3(best)	4.5−11.8 vs best

Bonus	0−3 vs best	3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0	0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Hinshelwood leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Next 5 GWs	COV (H) 10 BRE (A) 11 LIV (H) 12 AVL (A) 13 FUL (H) 14	BRE (H) 10 HUL (A) 11 NEW (H) 12 BOU (A) 13 NFO (A) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	3.00+0.20 vs best	2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Garner leads 3 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Garner	Hinshelwood
Form	3.0(best) 48th MID · 117th overall	2.0 86th MID · 198th overall
ICT index	30.4(best) 67th MID · 119th overall	23.7 83rd MID · 157th overall
Selected	113th MID 322nd overall	74th MID(best) 223rd overall
Points per game	2.6 89th MID · 204th overall	6.0(best) 7th MID · 16th overall
Cost rank	46th MID(best) 68th overall	60th MID 91st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

GarnerEVE
1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
HinshelwoodBHA
1. BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
2. BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Hinshelwood (BHA) 3.6 projected team goals, Garner (EVE) 2.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Garner−0.5Garner: 0 goals from 0.48 xG (−0.5)
Hinshelwood+0.5Hinshelwood: 3 goals from 2.47 xG (+0.5)

Hinshelwood has 0.5 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Garner−0.7Garner: 0 assists from 0.68 xA (−0.7)
Hinshelwood−0.1Hinshelwood: 0 assists from 0.06 xA (−0.1)

Garner has 0.7 fewer assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Garner · 23 pts65% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Hinshelwood · 24 pts63% from goals

Season points by source
Source	Garner	Hinshelwood
Appearances	17	5
Goals	0	15
Clean sheets	3	1
Defensive contribution	6	0
Bonus	0	3
Deductions	−3	0
Total	23	24

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Garner2.7(3)
Hinshelwood6.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

Garner3.0(3)
Hinshelwood16.0(1)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Garner2.0(3)
Hinshelwood1.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Garner 2.0 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Garner2.0(4)
Hinshelwood11.0(2)

Away

Garner3.0(5)
Hinshelwood1.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Garner 3.0 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.

Garner0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 9 EVE goals
Hinshelwood30%
3 goals and 0 assists of 10 BHA goals

Hinshelwood is involved in 30% of BHA's goals, against 0% for Garner.

Who is a rotation risk?

Garner6 of 9 full games
6 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59
Hinshelwood0 of 9 full games
1 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Garner120.6
Hinshelwood110.8

Creativity

Garner149.3
Hinshelwood16.3

Threat

Garner32.0
Hinshelwood110.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Garner's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Hinshelwood's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Garner+418625 out1.0k in
Hinshelwood−5971.7k out1.1k in

Garner has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+418).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Garner 3.8 points per £m (75th), Hinshelwood 4.1 points per £m (70th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Garner
Hinshelwood

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Garner 19, Hinshelwood 8.

How far ahead is Garner? Above zero Garner leads; below, Hinshelwood.

Garner is 11 points ahead of Hinshelwood over these gameweeks. Garner's biggest lead was 11 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Garner, gameweek 4: 4 points v TOT away, 90 minutes
Hinshelwood, gameweek 4: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutes
GW 5
Garner, gameweek 5: 3 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
Hinshelwood, gameweek 5: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
GW 6
Garner, gameweek 6: 4 points v HUL away, 90 minutes
Hinshelwood, gameweek 6: 0 points v SUN away, 0 minutes
GW 7
Garner, gameweek 7: 2 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
Hinshelwood, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 19 minutes
GW 8
Garner, gameweek 8: 3 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
Hinshelwood, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 45 minutes
GW 9
Garner, gameweek 9: 3 points v NEW away, 90 minutes
Hinshelwood, gameweek 9: 1 points v MCI away, 18 minutes

Garner: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Hinshelwood: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	4	0
5	3	0
6	4	0
7	2	6
8	3	1
9	3	1

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	90	0
5	90	0
6	90	0
7	90	19
8	90	45
9	90	18

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	0.04	0.00
5	0.16	0.00
6	0.04	0.00
7	0.00	0.92
8	0.03	0.00
9	0.21	0.14

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	0.02	0.00
5	0.04	0.00
6	0.31	0.00
7	0.02	0.02
8	0.08	0.02
9	0.10	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	0.06	0.00
5	0.20	0.00
6	0.35	0.00
7	0.02	0.94
8	0.11	0.02
9	0.31	0.14

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	17	0
5	9	0
6	12	0
7	8	2
8	13	3
9	11	4

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	1
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	0.1%	0.9%
5	0.2%	0.6%
6	0.2%	0.5%
7	0.2%	0.6%
8	0.2%	0.6%
9	0.2%	0.6%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	£6.0m	£6.0m
5	£6.0m	£5.9m
6	£6.0m	£5.9m
7	£6.0m	£5.9m
8	£6.0m	£5.9m
9	£6.0m	£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Garner	Hinshelwood
4	—	—
5	0.4%	0.3%
6	0.1%	0.0%
7	0.1%	0.1%
8	0.2%	0.2%
9	0.1%	0.2%