How do Davis and Mykolenko compare?

Mykolenko has more season points (34 vs 29), Davis is more owned (6.9% vs 2.4%), Davis is cheaper (4.0m vs 4.6m), Davis has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), Mykolenko has more Bonus (3 vs 1), but Davis has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Davis

19 stats won

Mykolenko

13 stats won

Who wins more stats: Davis or Mykolenko?

Davis wins 19 of 32 stats

Davis wins 19 of the 32 stats with an outright best. Others: Mykolenko 13.

Points
Davis: 29Mykolenko: 34
xGI (6 gw)
Davis: 0.23Mykolenko: 0.06
Price
Davis: £4.0mMykolenko: £4.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionDavisMykolenko
Price & ownership21
Playing time40
Recent form42
Season totals43
Set pieces20
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks23
Total1913

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Davis: Points 29, xGI (6 gw) 0.23, BPS 80, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 5.3, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Mykolenko: Points 34, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 149, Mins (6 gw) 72, DC (6 gw) 5.7, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Davis leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatDavisMykolenko
Price

4.0m−0.6m vs best

4.6m(best)

Ownership

6.9%(best)

2.4%−4.5% vs best

Top 10k ownership

4.3%(best)

1.6%−2.7% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Davis leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatDavisMykolenko
Starts

9(best)

8−1 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

89%−11% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

703−107 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

78−12 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Davis leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatDavisMykolenko
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

72−18 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.17(best)

0.01−0.16 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.07(best)

0.06−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.23(best)

0.06−0.17 vs best

DC (6 gw)

5.33−0.34 vs best

5.67(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.85+0.72 vs best

1.13(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Davis leads 4 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatDavisMykolenko
Points

29−5 vs best

34(best)

Goals

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

1.64(best)

0.04−1.60 vs best

Total xA

0.65(best)

0.42−0.23 vs best

DC (season)

49−7 vs best

56(best)

Clean sheets

0−4 vs best

4(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Davis leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatDavisMykolenko
Corners & indirect FKs

4th choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatDavisMykolenko
BPS

80−69 vs best

149(best)

BPS (6 gw)

10.8−7.0 vs best

17.8(best)

Bonus

1−2 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.2−0.3 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Davis leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatDavisMykolenko
Next 5 GWs

BOU

(H)

10

TOT

(A)

11

AVL

(H)

12

COV

(A)

13

LEE

(A)

14

COV

(H)

10

BRE

(A)

11

LIV

(H)

12

AVL

(A)

13

FUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Mykolenko leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatDavisMykolenko
Form

1.0

96th DEF · 268th overall

1.8(best)

78th DEF · 206th overall

ICT index

43.6(best)

8th DEF · 49th overall

25.4

46th DEF · 143rd overall

Selected

19th DEF(best)

53rd overall

45th DEF

119th overall

Points per game

3.2

60th DEF · 140th overall

4.2(best)

31st DEF · 70th overall

Cost rank

172nd DEF

617th overall

82nd DEF(best)

427th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • DavisIPS

    1. IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance

  • MykolenkoEVE

    1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
    2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mykolenko (EVE) 0.6 expected clean sheets, Davis (IPS) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Davis+0.4Davis: 2 goals from 1.64 xG (+0.4)
  • Mykolenko±0.0Mykolenko: 0 goals from 0.04 xG (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Davis+1.4Davis: 2 assists from 0.65 xA (+1.4)
  • Mykolenko−0.4Mykolenko: 0 assists from 0.42 xA (−0.4)

Davis has 1.4 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Davis+0.8Davis: 18 conceded from 17.21 xGC (+0.8)
  • Mykolenko−4.6Mykolenko: 7 conceded from 11.61 xGC (−4.6)

Davis has conceded 0.8 more than xGC; Mykolenko has conceded 4.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Davis · 29 pts49% from appearances

    −8 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Mykolenko · 34 pts41% from appearances

    −5 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceDavisMykolenko
Appearances1816
Goals120
Assists60
Clean sheets016
Defensive contribution04
Bonus13
Deductions−8−5
Total2934

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Davis4.5(4)
  • Mykolenko5.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Davis3.3(3)
  • Mykolenko6.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Davis0.5(2)
  • Mykolenko1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Mykolenko 1.7 points per game, Davis 0.5 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Davis1.5(4)
  • Mykolenko3.3(4)

Away

  • Davis4.6(5)
  • Mykolenko5.3(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Mykolenko 5.3 points per game, Davis 4.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Davis29%

    2 goals and 2 assists of 14 IPS goals

  • Mykolenko0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 7 EVE goals

Davis is involved in 29% of IPS's goals, against 0% for Mykolenko.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Davis9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Mykolenko7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Davis200.4
  • Mykolenko157.0

Creativity

  • Davis103.6
  • Mykolenko72.7

Threat

  • Davis130.0
  • Mykolenko23.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Davis's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Mykolenko's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Davis−16.7k19.1k out2.3k in
  • Mykolenko−133.7k out3.7k in

Managers are selling all of them; Mykolenko the least (−13 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Davis 7.3 points per £m (29th), Mykolenko 7.4 points per £m (25th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Davis
  • Mykolenko

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Mykolenko 23, Davis 20.

How far ahead is Davis? Above zero Davis leads; below, Mykolenko.

Mykolenko is 3 points ahead of Davis over these gameweeks. Davis's biggest lead was 3 (GW 4); Mykolenko's was 3 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Davis, gameweek 4: 14 points v CRY away, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 4: 11 points v TOT away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Davis, gameweek 5: 2 points v EVE away, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 5: 5 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Davis, gameweek 6: 1 points v FUL home, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 6: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Davis, gameweek 7: 0 points v MCI away, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 7: 1 points v CHE home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Davis, gameweek 8: 2 points v NFO home, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 8: 0 points v ARS away, 73 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Davis, gameweek 9: 1 points v HUL away, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 9: 6 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

Davis: 1 haul (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Mykolenko: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
41411
525
610
701
820
916

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
49090
59090
6900
79090
89073
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
40.520.00
50.420.04
60.050.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
40.190.07
50.020.02
60.010.00
70.110.21
80.060.01
90.010.04

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
40.710.07
50.440.06
60.060.00
70.110.21
80.060.01
90.010.04

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
4211
556
640
784
866
977

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
40.620.69
52.241.44
61.810.00
73.351.47
82.291.91
90.781.29

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
410
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
420
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
45.1%2.0%
57.0%4.3%
67.9%3.5%
77.5%2.7%
87.4%2.6%
97.0%2.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
4£4.0m£4.5m
5£4.0m£4.5m
6£4.0m£4.6m
7£4.0m£4.6m
8£4.0m£4.6m
9£4.0m£4.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWDavisMykolenko
4——
510.4%6.8%
67.9%4.5%
76.9%3.2%
85.9%2.6%
94.3%1.6%