How do Cherki and Foden compare?

Cherki has more season points (45 vs 20), Cherki is more owned (35.4% vs 2.5%), Foden is cheaper (6.8m vs 7.9m), Cherki has the higher Start rate (67% vs 44%), but Cherki has more Bonus (7 vs 3).

← Back to players Pick different players

Cherki

25 stats won

Foden

3 stats won

Who wins more stats: Cherki or Foden?

Cherki wins 25 of 28 stats

Cherki wins 25 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Foden 3.

Points
Cherki: 45Foden: 20
xGI (6 gw)
Cherki: 0.28Foden: 0.24
Price
Cherki: £7.9mFoden: £6.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionCherkiFoden
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form42
Season totals41
Set pieces20
Bonus40
Fixtures00
FPL ranks40
Total253

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Cherki: Points 45, xGI (6 gw) 0.28, BPS 198, Mins (6 gw) 50, DC (6 gw) 2.5, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Foden: Points 20, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 97, Mins (6 gw) 26, DC (6 gw) 0.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Cherki leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatCherkiFoden
Price

7.9m(best)

6.8m−1.1m vs best

Ownership

35.4%(best)

2.5%−32.9% vs best

Top 10k ownership

10.7%(best)

0.8%−9.9% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Cherki leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatCherkiFoden
Starts

6(best)

4−2 vs best

Start rate

67%(best)

44%−23% vs best

Minutes (season)

472(best)

349−123 vs best

Avg minutes

52(best)

39−13 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Cherki leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatCherkiFoden
Mins (6 gw)

50(best)

26−24 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.20(best)

0.11−0.09 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.08−0.05 vs best

0.13(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.28(best)

0.24−0.04 vs best

DC (6 gw)

2.50(best)

0.67−1.83 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.82+0.58 vs best

0.24(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Cherki leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatCherkiFoden
Points

45(best)

20−25 vs best

Goals

4(best)

1−3 vs best

Assists

2

2

Total xG

1.76−0.51 vs best

2.27(best)

Total xA

1.81(best)

1.63−0.18 vs best

DC (season)

21(best)

18−3 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Cherki leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatCherkiFoden
Corners & indirect FKs

1st choice(best)

2nd choice

Direct free kicks

1st choice(best)

2nd choice

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Cherki leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatCherkiFoden
BPS

198(best)

97−101 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

14.5(best)

6.8−7.7 vs best

Bonus

7(best)

3−4 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.5(best)

0.3−0.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatCherkiFoden
Next 5 GWs

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20

3.20

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Cherki leads 4 of 4
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatCherkiFoden
Form

2.8

59th MID · 139th overall

2.8

58th MID · 138th overall

ICT index

71.9(best)

5th MID · 7th overall

39.5

38th MID · 62nd overall

Selected

3rd MID(best)

8th overall

38th MID

116th overall

Points per game

5.6(best)

8th MID · 24th overall

2.9

78th MID · 180th overall

Cost rank

9th MID(best)

12th overall

18th MID

30th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • CherkiMCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

  • FodenMCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Cherki (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals, Foden (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Cherki+2.2Cherki: 4 goals from 1.76 xG (+2.2)
  • Foden−1.3Foden: 1 goals from 2.27 xG (−1.3)

Foden has 1.3 fewer goals than xG; Cherki has 2.2 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Cherki+0.2Cherki: 2 assists from 1.81 xA (+0.2)
  • Foden+0.4Foden: 2 assists from 1.63 xA (+0.4)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Cherki · 45 pts43% from goals

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Foden · 20 pts42% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceCherkiFoden
Appearances1210
Goals205
Assists66
Clean sheets20
Bonus73
Deductions−2−4
Total4520

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Cherki8.3(3)
  • Foden6.3(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Cherki3.0(3)
  • Foden0.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Cherki5.5(2)
  • Foden1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Cherki 5.5 points per game, Foden 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Cherki5.0(4)
  • Foden3.0(4)

Away

  • Cherki6.3(4)
  • Foden2.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Cherki 6.3 points per game, Foden 2.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Cherki35%

    4 goals and 2 assists of 17 MCI goals

  • Foden25%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 12 MCI goals

Cherki is involved in 35% of MCI's goals, against 25% for Foden.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Cherki1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Foden1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Cherki222.4
  • Foden106.0

Creativity

  • Cherki300.9
  • Foden206.6

Threat

  • Cherki196.0
  • Foden84.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Cherki's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Foden's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Cherki−211k237k out25.3k in
  • Foden−12.3k15.5k out3.2k in

Managers are selling all of them; Foden the least (−12.3k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Cherki 5.7 points per £m (30th), Foden 2.9 points per £m (100th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Cherki
  • Foden

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Cherki 20, Foden 9.

How far ahead is Cherki? Above zero Cherki leads; below, Foden.

Cherki is 11 points ahead of Foden over these gameweeks. Cherki's biggest lead was 21 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Cherki, gameweek 4: 1 points v MUN away, 45 minutes
    Foden, gameweek 4: -2 points v MUN away, 22 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Cherki, gameweek 5: 8 points v SUN home, 84 minutes
    Foden, gameweek 5: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Cherki, gameweek 6: 10 points v LIV away, 90 minutes
    Foden, gameweek 6: 0 points v LIV away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Cherki, gameweek 7: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
    Foden, gameweek 7: 9 points v IPS home, 76 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Cherki, gameweek 8: 0 points v AVL away, 45 minutes
    Foden, gameweek 8: 1 points v AVL away, 45 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Cherki, gameweek 9: 1 points v BHA home, 35 minutes
    Foden, gameweek 9: 1 points v BHA home, 11 minutes

Cherki: 1 haul (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Foden: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
41-2
580
6100
709
801
911

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
44522
5840
6900
7076
84545
93511

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
40.030.00
50.130.00
60.580.00
70.000.62
80.390.04
90.070.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
40.060.02
50.130.00
60.160.00
70.000.54
80.040.17
90.070.04

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
40.090.02
50.260.00
60.740.00
70.001.16
80.430.21
90.140.04

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
410
550
660
703
811
920

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
400
510
610
701
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
428.8%3.7%
528.1%1.9%
628.6%1.5%
737.3%1.5%
839.4%2.7%
936.7%2.6%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
4£7.8m£7.0m
5£7.8m£6.9m
6£7.8m£6.9m
7£7.9m£6.8m
8£8.0m£6.8m
9£8.0m£6.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWCherkiFoden
4——
516.5%0.4%
618.8%0.2%
732.8%0.8%
822.8%1.7%
910.7%0.8%