How do Cherif and McBurnie compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 17), McBurnie is more owned (1.7% vs 0.5%), Cherif is cheaper (5.0m vs 5.5m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 33%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 3), but Cherif has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.60 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Cherif

2 stats won

McBurnie

28 stats won

Who wins more stats: Cherif or McBurnie?

McBurnie wins 28 of 30 stats

McBurnie wins 28 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Cherif 2.

Points
Cherif: 17McBurnie: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Cherif: 0.07McBurnie: 0.31
Price
Cherif: £5.0mMcBurnie: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionCherifMcBurnie
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals05
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks05
Total228

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Cherif: Points 17, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 64, Mins (6 gw) 42, xG (6 gw) 0.07, Upcoming FDR 2.60. McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

McBurnie leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Price

5.0m−0.5m vs best

5.5m(best)

Ownership

0.5%−1.2% vs best

1.7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.1%−0.5% vs best

0.6%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Starts

3−6 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

33%−67% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

250−546 vs best

796(best)

Avg minutes

28−60 vs best

88(best)

Who has better recent form?

McBurnie leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Mins (6 gw)

42−46 vs best

88(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.07−0.21 vs best

0.28(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.03 vs best

0.03(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.07−0.24 vs best

0.31(best)

DC (6 gw)

1.33−2.84 vs best

4.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.71(best)

1.33+0.62 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Points

17−19 vs best

36(best)

Goals

1−1 vs best

2(best)

Assists

1−2 vs best

3(best)

Total xG

0.39−1.83 vs best

2.22(best)

Total xA

0.02−0.22 vs best

0.24(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

2nd choice(best)

Penalties

—

1st choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatCherifMcBurnie
BPS

64−69 vs best

133(best)

BPS (6 gw)

10.7−6.5 vs best

17.2(best)

Bonus

3−2 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.5−0.3 vs best

0.8(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Cherif leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Next 5 GWs

EVE

(A)

10

CRY

(H)

11

LEE

(A)

12

IPS

(H)

13

MUN

(A)

14

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.60(best)

3.60+1.00 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatCherifMcBurnie
Form

4.0

9th FWD · 67th overall

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

ICT index

9.7

30th FWD · 298th overall

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

Selected

38th FWD

259th overall

20th FWD(best)

135th overall

Points per game

3.4

15th FWD · 127th overall

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

Cost rank

59th FWD

317th overall

33rd FWD(best)

125th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • CherifCOV

    1. COV v EVE away, gameweek 10: 0.92 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
    2. COV v CRY home, gameweek 11: 1.38 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance

  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Cherif (COV) 2.3 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Cherif+0.6Cherif: 1 goals from 0.39 xG (+0.6)
  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)

Cherif has 0.6 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Cherif+1.0Cherif: 1 assists from 0.02 xA (+1.0)
  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Cherif · 17 pts41% from appearances

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceCherifMcBurnie
Appearances718
Goals48
Assists39
Bonus35
Deductions0−4
Total1736

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Cherif1.5(2)
  • McBurnie6.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Cherif6.5(2)
  • McBurnie3.2(6)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Cherif1.0(1)
  • McBurnie4.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Cherif 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Cherif4.0(4)
  • McBurnie5.6(5)

Away

  • Cherif1.0(1)
  • McBurnie2.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: McBurnie 2.0 points per game, Cherif 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Cherif25%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 8 COV goals

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 25% for Cherif.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Cherif0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 4 × Didn't play

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Cherif41.0
  • McBurnie150.4

Creativity

  • Cherif12.4
  • McBurnie104.4

Threat

  • Cherif46.0
  • McBurnie156.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Cherif's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Cherif−1.2k3.4k out2.1k in
  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.6k in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Cherif 3.4 points per £m (18th), McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Cherif
  • McBurnie

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Cherif 17.

How far ahead is Cherif? Above zero Cherif leads; below, McBurnie.

McBurnie is 11 points ahead of Cherif over these gameweeks. Cherif's biggest lead was 7 (GW 6); McBurnie's was 11 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Cherif, gameweek 4: 1 points v BHA home, 30 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Cherif, gameweek 5: 0 points v NFO away, 0 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Cherif, gameweek 6: 12 points v NEW home, 77 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Cherif, gameweek 7: 1 points v TOT away, 59 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Cherif, gameweek 8: 2 points v FUL home, 66 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Cherif, gameweek 9: 1 points v SUN home, 18 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

Cherif: 1 haul (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
414
501
6121
712
828
9112

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
43081
5090
67790
75990
86685
91890

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
40.000.33
50.000.36
60.330.00
70.020.00
80.020.79
90.020.20

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
40.000.04
50.000.02
60.000.09
70.020.00
80.000.01
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
40.000.37
50.000.38
60.330.09
70.040.00
80.020.80
90.020.21

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
413
506
625
743
813
905

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
400
500
610
700
801
901

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
401
500
610
700
800
901

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
40.1%1.9%
50.1%2.0%
60.1%1.9%
70.3%1.8%
80.4%1.6%
90.5%1.7%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
4£5.0m£5.5m
5£5.0m£5.5m
6£5.0m£5.5m
7£5.0m£5.5m
8£5.0m£5.5m
9£5.0m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWCherifMcBurnie
4——
50.0%0.4%
60.0%0.3%
70.0%0.2%
80.0%0.2%
90.1%0.6%