How do Calvert-Lewin and Richarlison compare?

Calvert-Lewin has more season points (37 vs 2), Calvert-Lewin is more owned (20.8% vs 0.5%), Richarlison is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.1m), Calvert-Lewin has the higher Start rate (100% vs 11%), Calvert-Lewin has more Bonus (7 vs 0), but Richarlison has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Calvert-Lewin

27 stats won

Richarlison

2 stats won

Who wins more stats: Calvert-Lewin or Richarlison?

Calvert-Lewin wins 27 of 29 stats

Calvert-Lewin wins 27 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Richarlison 2.

Points
Calvert-Lewin: 37Richarlison: 2
xGI (6 gw)
Calvert-Lewin: 0.39Richarlison: 0.00
Price
Calvert-Lewin: £6.1mRicharlison: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals50
Set pieces10
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks50
Total272

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Calvert-Lewin: Points 37, xGI (6 gw) 0.39, BPS 118, Mins (6 gw) 87, xG (6 gw) 0.38, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Richarlison: Points 2, xGI (6 gw) 0.00, BPS 6, Mins (6 gw) 0, xG (6 gw) 0.00, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Calvert-Lewin leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Price

6.1m(best)

5.9m−0.2m vs best

Ownership

20.8%(best)

0.5%−20.3% vs best

Top 10k ownership

25.7%(best)

0.0%−25.7% vs best

Availability

Available

0% · not included in squad.

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Calvert-Lewin leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Starts

9(best)

1−8 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

11%−89% vs best

Minutes (season)

773(best)

67−706 vs best

Avg minutes

86(best)

7−79 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Calvert-Lewin leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Mins (6 gw)

87(best)

0−87 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.38(best)

0.00−0.38 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.39(best)

0.00−0.39 vs best

DC (6 gw)

3.50(best)

0.00−3.50 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.17+1.17 vs best

0.00(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Calvert-Lewin leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Points

37(best)

2−35 vs best

Goals

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Assists

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Total xG

3.91(best)

0.00−3.91 vs best

Total xA

0.14(best)

0.00−0.14 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Calvert-Lewin leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

1st choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Calvert-Lewin leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
BPS

118(best)

6−112 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

14.8(best)

0.0−14.8 vs best

Bonus

7(best)

0−7 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.8(best)

0.0−0.8 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Richarlison leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.40 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Calvert-Lewin leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Form

3.8(best)

10th FWD · 77th overall

0.0

74th FWD · 654th overall

ICT index

41.5(best)

10th FWD · 54th overall

0.2

50th FWD · 443rd overall

Selected

5th FWD(best)

18th overall

36th FWD

242nd overall

Points per game

4.1(best)

8th FWD · 83rd overall

2.0

30th FWD · 281st overall

Cost rank

14th FWD(best)

62nd overall

19th FWD

80th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • Calvert-LewinLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

  • RicharlisonTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Richarlison (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Calvert-Lewin (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Calvert-Lewin−0.9Calvert-Lewin: 3 goals from 3.91 xG (−0.9)
  • Richarlison±0.0Richarlison: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)

Calvert-Lewin has 0.9 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Calvert-Lewin+0.9Calvert-Lewin: 1 assists from 0.14 xA (+0.9)
  • Richarlison±0.0Richarlison: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)

Calvert-Lewin has 0.9 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Calvert-Lewin · 37 pts45% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Richarlison · 2 pts100% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceCalvert-LewinRicharlison
Appearances182
Goals120
Assists30
Bonus70
Deductions−30
Total372

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Calvert-Lewin1.5(2)
  • RicharlisonNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Calvert-Lewin7.3(4)
  • RicharlisonNo games

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Calvert-Lewin1.7(3)
  • Richarlison2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Richarlison 2.0 points per game, Calvert-Lewin 1.7 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Calvert-Lewin7.3(4)
  • RicharlisonNo games

Away

  • Calvert-Lewin1.6(5)
  • Richarlison2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Richarlison 2.0 points per game, Calvert-Lewin 1.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Calvert-Lewin44%

    3 goals and 1 assist of 9 LEE goals

  • Richarlison

    No TOT goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Calvert-Lewin6 of 9 full games

    6 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89

  • Richarlison0 of 9 full games

    1 × 60–89, 8 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Calvert-Lewin139.4
  • Richarlison0.0

Creativity

  • Calvert-Lewin55.4
  • Richarlison2.2

Threat

  • Calvert-Lewin227.0
  • Richarlison0.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Calvert-Lewin's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Richarlison's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Calvert-Lewin−53.1k77.6k out24.5k in
  • Richarlison−466466 out0 in

Managers are selling all of them; Richarlison the least (−466 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Calvert-Lewin 6.1 points per £m (7th), Richarlison 0.3 points per £m (49th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Calvert-Lewin
  • Richarlison

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Calvert-Lewin 27, Richarlison 0.

How far ahead is Calvert-Lewin? Above zero Calvert-Lewin leads; below, Richarlison.

Calvert-Lewin is 27 points ahead of Richarlison over these gameweeks. Calvert-Lewin's biggest lead was 27 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 4: 10 points v NEW home, 77 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 5: 2 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 6: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 7: 9 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 7: 0 points v COV home, 0 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 8: 2 points v SUN away, 84 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 8: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 9: 2 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 9: 0 points v CRY home, 0 minutes

Calvert-Lewin: 1 haul (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Richarlison: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
4100
520
620
790
820
920

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
4770
5900
6900
7900
8840
9900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
40.870.00
50.520.00
60.000.00
70.600.00
80.000.00
90.310.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.050.00
80.010.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
40.870.00
50.520.00
60.000.00
70.650.00
80.010.00
90.310.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
450
580
640
730
800
910

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
410
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
410
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
421.5%0.9%
526.7%0.7%
622.6%0.6%
722.8%0.6%
822.9%0.5%
920.9%0.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
4£6.0m£5.9m
5£6.0m£5.9m
6£6.0m£5.9m
7£6.0m£5.9m
8£6.1m£5.9m
9£6.1m£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinRicharlison
4——
544.0%0.1%
625.5%0.0%
741.6%0.0%
839.8%0.0%
925.7%0.0%