How do Calafiori and Rúben compare?

Calafiori has more season points (51 vs 27), Calafiori is more owned (48% vs 2%), Rúben is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.9m), Rúben has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), but Calafiori has more Bonus (3 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Calafiori

22 stats won

Rúben

6 stats won

Who wins more stats: Calafiori or Rúben?

Calafiori wins 22 of 28 stats

Calafiori wins 22 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Rúben 6.

Points
Calafiori: 51Rúben: 27
xGI (6 gw)
Calafiori: 0.18Rúben: 0.09
Price
Calafiori: £5.9mRúben: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionCalafioriRúben
Price & ownership30
Playing time04
Recent form41
Season totals61
Set pieces00
Bonus40
Fixtures00
FPL ranks50
Total226

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Calafiori: Points 51, xGI (6 gw) 0.18, BPS 146, Mins (6 gw) 77, DC (6 gw) 4.5, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Rúben: Points 27, xGI (6 gw) 0.09, BPS 112, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 4.5, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Calafiori leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatCalafioriRúben
Price

5.9m(best)

5.5m−0.4m vs best

Ownership

48%(best)

2%−46% vs best

Top 10k ownership

66.1%(best)

0.1%−66.0% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Rúben leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatCalafioriRúben
Starts

8−1 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

89%−11% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

699−111 vs best

810(best)

Avg minutes

78−12 vs best

90(best)

Who has better recent form?

Calafiori leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatCalafioriRúben
Mins (6 gw)

77−13 vs best

90(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.11(best)

0.07−0.04 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.07(best)

0.02−0.05 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.18(best)

0.09−0.09 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.50

4.50

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.99(best)

1.50+0.51 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Calafiori leads 6 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatCalafioriRúben
Points

51(best)

27−24 vs best

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

1.22(best)

0.51−0.71 vs best

Total xA

1.00(best)

0.88−0.12 vs best

DC (season)

36−6 vs best

42(best)

Clean sheets

5(best)

3−2 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatCalafioriRúben
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Calafiori leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatCalafioriRúben
BPS

146(best)

112−34 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

14.2(best)

9.5−4.7 vs best

Bonus

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.2(best)

0.0−0.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatCalafioriRúben
Next 5 GWs

HUL

(H)

10

NEW

(A)

11

MCI

(H)

12

BRE

(A)

13

TOT

(A)

14

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20

3.20

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Calafiori leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatCalafioriRúben
Form

5.5(best)

8th DEF · 23rd overall

2.5

56th DEF · 157th overall

ICT index

37.1(best)

19th DEF · 73rd overall

30.5

36th DEF · 117th overall

Selected

1st DEF(best)

3rd overall

49th DEF

130th overall

Points per game

5.7(best)

10th DEF · 23rd overall

3.0

68th DEF · 166th overall

Cost rank

10th DEF(best)

87th overall

13th DEF

126th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • CalafioriARS

    1. ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.79 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
    2. ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • RúbenMCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Calafiori (ARS) 0.9 expected clean sheets, Rúben (MCI) 0.8 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Calafiori−0.2Calafiori: 1 goals from 1.22 xG (−0.2)
  • Rúben−0.5Rúben: 0 goals from 0.51 xG (−0.5)

Rúben has 0.5 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Calafiori+1.0Calafiori: 2 assists from 1.00 xA (+1.0)
  • Rúben−0.9Rúben: 0 assists from 0.88 xA (−0.9)

Rúben has 0.9 fewer assists than xA; Calafiori has 1.0 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Calafiori−1.6Calafiori: 5 conceded from 6.57 xGC (−1.6)
  • Rúben−1.7Rúben: 10 conceded from 11.66 xGC (−1.7)

Rúben has conceded 1.7 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Calafiori · 51 pts38% from clean sheets

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Rúben · 27 pts60% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceCalafioriRúben
Appearances1718
Goals60
Assists60
Clean sheets2012
Bonus30
Deductions−1−3
Total5127

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Calafiori7.5(2)
  • Rúben2.5(4)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Calafiori6.8(4)
  • Rúben3.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Calafiori3.0(3)
  • Rúben4.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Rúben 4.0 points per game, Calafiori 3.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Calafiori5.3(4)
  • Rúben2.4(5)

Away

  • Calafiori6.0(5)
  • Rúben3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Calafiori 6.0 points per game, Rúben 3.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Calafiori21%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 14 ARS goals

  • Rúben0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 20 MCI goals

Calafiori is involved in 21% of ARS's goals, against 0% for Rúben.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Calafiori5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

  • Rúben9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Calafiori148.4
  • Rúben163.2

Creativity

  • Calafiori89.0
  • Rúben70.0

Threat

  • Calafiori132.0
  • Rúben73.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Calafiori's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Rúben's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Calafiori−32.5k76.0k out43.6k in
  • Rúben−1.5k4.1k out2.5k in

Managers are selling all of them; Rúben the least (−1.5k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Calafiori 8.6 points per £m (12th), Rúben 4.9 points per £m (58th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Calafiori
  • Rúben

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Calafiori 29, Rúben 17.

How far ahead is Calafiori? Above zero Calafiori leads; below, Rúben.

Calafiori is 12 points ahead of Rúben over these gameweeks. Calafiori's biggest lead was 12 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Calafiori, gameweek 4: 6 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    Rúben, gameweek 4: 6 points v MUN away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Calafiori, gameweek 5: 1 points v BHA away, 90 minutes
    Rúben, gameweek 5: 1 points v SUN home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Calafiori, gameweek 6: 9 points v LEE home, 81 minutes
    Rúben, gameweek 6: 6 points v LIV away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Calafiori, gameweek 7: 6 points v NFO away, 90 minutes
    Rúben, gameweek 7: 1 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Calafiori, gameweek 8: 1 points v EVE home, 22 minutes
    Rúben, gameweek 8: 1 points v AVL away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Calafiori, gameweek 9: 6 points v LIV away, 90 minutes
    Rúben, gameweek 9: 2 points v BHA home, 90 minutes

Calafiori: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Rúben: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
466
511
696
761
811
962

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
49090
59090
68190
79090
82290
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
40.060.00
50.070.20
60.550.00
70.000.22
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
40.010.00
50.030.00
60.060.01
70.300.09
80.000.02
90.020.02

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
40.070.00
50.100.20
60.610.01
70.300.31
80.000.02
90.020.02

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
447
554
644
724
835
993

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
41.801.00
51.313.57
60.620.94
70.901.86
80.240.61
91.051.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
400
500
610
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
449.6%1.8%
550.3%1.9%
651.7%1.9%
753.5%2.0%
855.1%2.0%
946.4%2.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
4£5.8m£5.5m
5£5.8m£5.5m
6£5.9m£5.5m
7£5.9m£5.5m
8£6.0m£5.5m
9£5.9m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWCalafioriRúben
4——
578.4%0.2%
695.0%0.1%
795.9%0.2%
890.8%0.1%
966.1%0.1%