How do Bogle and Van de Ven compare?
Bogle has more season points (51 vs 30), Bogle is more owned (11.3% vs 3.9%), Bogle is cheaper (4.8m vs 5.0m), Bogle has the higher Start rate (100% vs 78%), Bogle has more Bonus (6 vs 3), but Van de Ven has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).
Comparing 2 defenders
Bogle wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Bogle or Van de Ven?
Bogle wins 21 of 29 stats
Bogle wins 21 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Van de Ven 8.
- Points
- Bogle: 51Van de Ven: 30
- xGI (6 gw)
- Bogle: 0.22Van de Ven: 0.04
- Price
- Bogle: £4.8mVan de Ven: £5.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 4 | 2 |
| Season totals | 5 | 1 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 3 | 1 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 1 |
| FPL ranks | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 21 | 8 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Bogle leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.8m−0.2m vs best | 5.0m(best) |
| Ownership | 11.3%(best) | 3.9%−7.4% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 3.0%(best) | 1.9%−1.1% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Bogle leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9(best) | 7−2 vs best |
| Start rate | 100%(best) | 78%−22% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 720(best) | 646−74 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 80(best) | 72−8 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Bogle leads 4 of 6
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 84(best) | 78−6 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.13(best) | 0.02−0.11 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.10(best) | 0.03−0.07 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.22(best) | 0.04−0.18 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 2.83−1.00 vs best | 3.83(best) |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.03+0.35 vs best | 0.68(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Bogle leads 5 of 6
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 51(best) | 30−21 vs best |
| Goals | 2(best) | 0−2 vs best |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 1.65(best) | 0.67−0.98 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.61(best) | 0.17−0.44 vs best |
| DC (season) | 29−11 vs best | 40(best) |
| Clean sheets | 5(best) | 4−1 vs best |
See alsoDefender stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Bogle leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 161(best) | 135−26 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 16.3−0.4 vs best | 16.7(best) |
| Bonus | 6(best) | 3−3 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.5(best) | 0.0−0.5 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Van de Ven leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | TOT (H) 10 CHE (A) 11 COV (H) 12 MCI (A) 13 IPS (H) 14 | LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.20+0.40 vs best | 2.80(best) |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Bogle leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 2.2 64th DEF · 169th overall | 3.5(best) 32nd DEF · 81st overall |
| ICT index | 45.9(best) 4th DEF · 41st overall | 21.1 61st DEF · 183rd overall |
| Selected | 12th DEF(best) 34th overall | 34th DEF 89th overall |
| Points per game | 5.7(best) 9th DEF · 22nd overall | 3.8 47th DEF · 105th overall |
| Cost rank | 71st DEF 390th overall | 50th DEF(best) 294th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
BogleLEE
- LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance
Van de VenTOT
- TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Van de Ven (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Bogle (LEE) 0.5 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Bogle+0.3Bogle: 2 goals from 1.65 xG (+0.3)
- Van de Ven−0.7Van de Ven: 0 goals from 0.67 xG (−0.7)
Van de Ven has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Bogle−0.6Bogle: 0 assists from 0.61 xA (−0.6)
- Van de Ven−0.2Van de Ven: 0 assists from 0.17 xA (−0.2)
Bogle has 0.6 fewer assists than xA.
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Bogle−1.8Bogle: 6 conceded from 7.84 xGC (−1.8)
- Van de Ven+0.3Van de Ven: 6 conceded from 5.74 xGC (+0.3)
Bogle has conceded 1.8 fewer than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Bogle · 51 pts35% from appearances
Van de Ven · 30 pts47% from clean sheets
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 15 |
| Goals | 12 | 0 |
| Clean sheets | 12 | 16 |
| Bonus | 6 | 3 |
| Other | 3 | 0 |
| Deductions | 0 | −4 |
| Total | 51 | 30 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Bogle5.5(2)
- Van de Ven5.7(3)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Bogle6.0(4)
- Van de Ven2.0(4)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Bogle5.3(3)
- Van de Ven5.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Bogle 5.3 points per game, Van de Ven 5.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Bogle6.0(4)
- Van de Ven3.0(5)
Away
- Bogle5.4(5)
- Van de Ven5.0(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Bogle 5.4 points per game, Van de Ven 5.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Bogle22%
2 goals and 0 assists of 9 LEE goals
Van de Ven0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals
Bogle is involved in 22% of LEE's goals, against 0% for Van de Ven.
Who is a rotation risk?
Bogle4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89
Van de Ven7 of 9 full games
7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Bogle156.8
- Van de Ven131.0
Creativity
- Bogle115.5
- Van de Ven56.6
Threat
- Bogle187.0
- Van de Ven22.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Bogle's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Van de Ven's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Bogle−19.1k37.0k out17.9k in
- Van de Ven+3.2k4.5k out7.7k in
Van de Ven has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+3.2k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Bogle
- Van de Ven
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Bogle, gameweek 4: 15 points v NEW home, 82 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 4: 6 points v EVE home, 90 minutesGW 5
Bogle, gameweek 5: 5 points v CRY home, 66 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 5: 1 points v AVL home, 90 minutesGW 6
Bogle, gameweek 6: 1 points v ARS away, 85 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 16 minutesGW 7
Bogle, gameweek 7: 2 points v MUN home, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 7: 2 points v COV home, 90 minutesGW 8
Bogle, gameweek 8: 5 points v SUN away, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 8: 5 points v CHE away, 90 minutesGW 9
Bogle, gameweek 9: 1 points v BOU away, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 9: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
Bogle: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Van de Ven: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 15 | 6 |
| 5 | 5 | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 |
| 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 9 | 1 | 6 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 82 | 90 |
| 5 | 66 | 90 |
| 6 | 85 | 16 |
| 7 | 90 | 90 |
| 8 | 90 | 90 |
| 9 | 90 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| 6 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| 8 | 0.12 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 6 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.33 | 0.02 |
| 8 | 0.12 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.46 | 0.02 |
| 5 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.37 | 0.10 |
| 8 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | 1 | 6 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 7 | 3 | 7 |
| 8 | 5 | 1 |
| 9 | 4 | 3 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.59 | 1.11 |
| 5 | 0.66 | 1.16 |
| 6 | 1.91 | 0.45 |
| 7 | 0.92 | 0.77 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.47 |
| 9 | 1.29 | 0.14 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.2% | 3.9% |
| 5 | 6.4% | 4.0% |
| 6 | 8.3% | 3.7% |
| 7 | 9.6% | 3.7% |
| 8 | 10.9% | 3.5% |
| 9 | 11.5% | 4.1% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.5m | £5.0m |
| 5 | £4.6m | £5.0m |
| 6 | £4.6m | £5.0m |
| 7 | £4.7m | £5.0m |
| 8 | £4.7m | £5.0m |
| 9 | £4.8m | £5.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Bogle | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 5.7% | 0.3% |
| 6 | 3.7% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 4.0% | 0.2% |
| 8 | 4.6% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 3.0% | 1.9% |

