How do Akpom and McBurnie compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 11), McBurnie is more owned (1.7% vs 0.9%), Akpom is cheaper (5.0m vs 5.5m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 0%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Akpom has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Akpom

2 stats won

McBurnie

28 stats won

Who wins more stats: Akpom or McBurnie?

McBurnie wins 28 of 30 stats

McBurnie wins 28 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Akpom 2.

Points
Akpom: 11McBurnie: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Akpom: 0.06McBurnie: 0.31
Price
Akpom: £5.0mMcBurnie: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionAkpomMcBurnie
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals05
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks05
Total228

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Akpom: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 54, Mins (6 gw) 8, xG (6 gw) 0.06, Upcoming FDR 2.80. McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

McBurnie leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Price

5.0m−0.5m vs best

5.5m(best)

Ownership

0.9%−0.8% vs best

1.7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−0.6% vs best

0.6%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Starts

0−9 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

0%−100% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

114−682 vs best

796(best)

Avg minutes

13−75 vs best

88(best)

Who has better recent form?

McBurnie leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Mins (6 gw)

8−80 vs best

88(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.06−0.22 vs best

0.28(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.03 vs best

0.03(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.06−0.25 vs best

0.31(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.33−3.84 vs best

4.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.32(best)

1.33+1.01 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Points

11−25 vs best

36(best)

Goals

1−1 vs best

2(best)

Assists

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Total xG

1.30−0.92 vs best

2.22(best)

Total xA

0.00−0.24 vs best

0.24(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

2nd choice(best)

Penalties

—

1st choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
BPS

54−79 vs best

133(best)

BPS (6 gw)

3.5−13.7 vs best

17.2(best)

Bonus

0−5 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.8 vs best

0.8(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Akpom leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Next 5 GWs

BOU

(H)

10

TOT

(A)

11

AVL

(H)

12

COV

(A)

13

LEE

(A)

14

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatAkpomMcBurnie
Form

1.0

27th FWD · 278th overall

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

ICT index

7.7

36th FWD · 322nd overall

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

Selected

27th FWD

195th overall

20th FWD(best)

135th overall

Points per game

1.6

33rd FWD · 306th overall

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

Cost rank

51st FWD

249th overall

33rd FWD(best)

125th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • AkpomIPS

    1. IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance

  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Akpom (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Akpom−0.3Akpom: 1 goals from 1.30 xG (−0.3)
  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Akpom±0.0Akpom: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Akpom · 11 pts64% from appearances

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceAkpomMcBurnie
Appearances718
Goals48
Assists09
Bonus05
Deductions0−4
Total1136

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Akpom1.0(3)
  • McBurnie6.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Akpom2.3(3)
  • McBurnie3.2(6)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Akpom1.0(1)
  • McBurnie4.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Akpom 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Akpom1.0(3)
  • McBurnie5.6(5)

Away

  • Akpom2.0(4)
  • McBurnie2.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Akpom 2.0 points per game, McBurnie 2.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Akpom9%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 11 IPS goals

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

McBurnie is involved in 45% of HUL's goals, against 9% for Akpom.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Akpom0 of 9 full games

    7 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Akpom37.6
  • McBurnie150.4

Creativity

  • Akpom5.7
  • McBurnie104.4

Threat

  • Akpom34.0
  • McBurnie156.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Akpom's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Akpom−3.0k3.5k out463 in
  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.6k in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Akpom 2.2 points per £m (28th), McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Akpom
  • McBurnie

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Akpom 5.

How far ahead is Akpom? Above zero Akpom leads; below, McBurnie.

McBurnie is 23 points ahead of Akpom over these gameweeks. McBurnie's was 23 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Akpom, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Akpom, gameweek 5: 1 points v EVE away, 9 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Akpom, gameweek 6: 1 points v FUL home, 19 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Akpom, gameweek 7: 1 points v MCI away, 12 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Akpom, gameweek 8: 1 points v NFO home, 4 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Akpom, gameweek 9: 1 points v HUL away, 1 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

Akpom: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
404
511
611
712
818
9112

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
4081
5990
61990
71290
8485
9190

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
40.000.33
50.170.36
60.160.00
70.000.00
80.000.79
90.000.20

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
40.000.04
50.000.02
60.000.09
70.000.00
80.000.01
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
40.000.37
50.170.38
60.160.09
70.000.00
80.000.80
90.000.21

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
403
506
615
713
803
905

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
400
500
600
700
801
901

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
401
500
600
700
800
901

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
41.2%1.9%
51.2%2.0%
61.1%1.9%
71.1%1.8%
81.0%1.6%
90.9%1.7%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
4£5.0m£5.5m
5£5.0m£5.5m
6£5.0m£5.5m
7£5.0m£5.5m
8£5.0m£5.5m
9£5.0m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWAkpomMcBurnie
4——
50.6%0.4%
60.2%0.3%
70.1%0.2%
80.1%0.2%
90.0%0.6%