How do Akpom and Nmecha compare?
Akpom and Nmecha are level on season points (11), Akpom is more owned (0.9% vs 0.4%), Akpom is cheaper (5.0m vs 5.3m), but Akpom has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).
Who wins more stats: Akpom or Nmecha?
Nmecha wins 11 of 20 stats
Nmecha wins 11 of the 20 stats with an outright best. Others: Akpom 9.
- Points
- Akpom: 11Nmecha: 11
- xGI (6 gw)
- Akpom: 0.06Nmecha: 0.06
- Price
- Akpom: £5.0mNmecha: £5.3m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 1 |
| Recent form | 2 | 3 |
| Season totals | 2 | 2 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 1 |
| Bonus | 1 | 1 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 11 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Split
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.0m−0.3m vs best | 5.3m(best) |
| Ownership | 0.9%(best) | 0.4%−0.5% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Nmecha leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0 | 0 |
| Start rate | 0% | 0% |
| Minutes (season) | 114−7 vs best | 121(best) |
| Avg minutes | 13 | 13 |
Who has better recent form?
Nmecha leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 8−6 vs best | 14(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.06(best) | 0.04−0.02 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00−0.01 vs best | 0.01(best) |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.33−1.00 vs best | 1.33(best) |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.32(best) | 0.42+0.10 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Split
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11 | 11 |
| Goals | 1(best) | 0−1 vs best |
| Assists | 0−1 vs best | 1(best) |
| Total xG | 1.30(best) | 0.53−0.77 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.00−0.21 vs best | 0.21(best) |
See alsoForward stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
Nmecha leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | 2nd choice(best) |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Split
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 54(best) | 43−11 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 3.5−0.3 vs best | 3.8(best) |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Akpom leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BOU (H) 10 TOT (A) 11 AVL (H) 12 COV (A) 13 LEE (A) 14 | TOT (H) 10 CHE (A) 11 COV (H) 12 MCI (A) 13 IPS (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80(best) | 3.20+0.40 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Split
| Stat | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 1.0 27th FWD · 278th overall | 1.0 28th FWD · 279th overall |
| ICT index | 7.7 36th FWD · 322nd overall | 8.3(best) 33rd FWD · 314th overall |
| Selected | 27th FWD(best) 195th overall | 45th FWD 274th overall |
| Points per game | 1.6(best) 33rd FWD · 306th overall | 1.4 35th FWD · 330th overall |
| Cost rank | 51st FWD 249th overall | 46th FWD(best) 194th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
AkpomIPS
- IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance
NmechaLEE
- LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Nmecha (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals, Akpom (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Akpom−0.3Akpom: 1 goals from 1.30 xG (−0.3)
- Nmecha−0.5Nmecha: 0 goals from 0.53 xG (−0.5)
Nmecha has 0.5 fewer goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Akpom±0.0Akpom: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
- Nmecha+0.8Nmecha: 1 assists from 0.21 xA (+0.8)
Nmecha has 0.8 more assists than xA.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Akpom · 11 pts64% from appearances
Nmecha · 11 pts73% from appearances
| Source | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 7 | 8 |
| Goals | 4 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 3 |
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 11 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Akpom1.0(3)
- Nmecha1.0(1)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Akpom2.3(3)
- Nmecha1.8(4)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Akpom1.0(1)
- Nmecha1.0(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Akpom 1.0 points per game, Nmecha 1.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Akpom1.0(3)
- Nmecha1.8(4)
Away
- Akpom2.0(4)
- Nmecha1.0(4)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Akpom 2.0 points per game, Nmecha 1.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Akpom9%
1 goal and 0 assists of 11 IPS goals
Nmecha13%
0 goals and 1 assist of 8 LEE goals
Nmecha is involved in 13% of LEE's goals, against 9% for Akpom.
Who is a rotation risk?
Akpom0 of 9 full games
7 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Nmecha0 of 9 full games
8 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Akpom37.6
- Nmecha27.2
Creativity
- Akpom5.7
- Nmecha28.5
Threat
- Akpom34.0
- Nmecha28.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Akpom's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Nmecha's biggest score is creativity, a creator.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Akpom−3.0k3.5k out464 in
- Nmecha−8651.3k out398 in
Managers are selling all of them; Nmecha the least (−865 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Akpom
- Nmecha
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Akpom, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutesNmecha, gameweek 4: 1 points v NEW home, 12 minutesGW 5
Akpom, gameweek 5: 1 points v EVE away, 9 minutesNmecha, gameweek 5: 1 points v CRY home, 14 minutesGW 6
Akpom, gameweek 6: 1 points v FUL home, 19 minutesNmecha, gameweek 6: 1 points v ARS away, 11 minutesGW 7
Akpom, gameweek 7: 1 points v MCI away, 12 minutesNmecha, gameweek 7: 1 points v MUN home, 16 minutesGW 8
Akpom, gameweek 8: 1 points v NFO home, 4 minutesNmecha, gameweek 8: 1 points v SUN away, 5 minutesGW 9
Akpom, gameweek 9: 1 points v HUL away, 1 minutesNmecha, gameweek 9: 1 points v BOU away, 25 minutes
Akpom: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Nmecha: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 12 |
| 5 | 9 | 14 |
| 6 | 19 | 11 |
| 7 | 12 | 16 |
| 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 9 | 1 | 25 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| 5 | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| 5 | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| 6 | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| 7 | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| 8 | 1.0% | 0.4% |
| 9 | 0.9% | 0.4% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £5.4m |
| 5 | £5.0m | £5.4m |
| 6 | £5.0m | £5.4m |
| 7 | £5.0m | £5.4m |
| 8 | £5.0m | £5.3m |
| 9 | £5.0m | £5.3m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Akpom | Nmecha |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.6% | 0.1% |
| 6 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.0% |

