How do E.Le Fée and Lewis-Potter compare?
Lewis-Potter has more season points (38 vs 35), E.Le Fée is more owned (2.7% vs 1.9%), Lewis-Potter is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.7m), Lewis-Potter has more Bonus (5 vs 2), but E.Le Fée has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.40 vs 3.60).
Comparing 2 midfielders
E.Le Fée wins most stats
Who wins more stats: E.Le Fée or Lewis-Potter?
E.Le Fée wins 21 of 29 stats
E.Le Fée wins 21 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Lewis-Potter 8.
- Points
- E.Le Fée: 35Lewis-Potter: 38
- xGI (6 gw)
- E.Le Fée: 0.57Lewis-Potter: 0.10
- Price
- E.Le Fée: £5.7mLewis-Potter: £5.5m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 3 | 0 |
| Playing time | 2 | 0 |
| Recent form | 5 | 1 |
| Season totals | 2 | 2 |
| Set pieces | 2 | 2 |
| Bonus | 2 | 2 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 8 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
E.Le Fée leads 3 of 3
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.7m(best) | 5.5m−0.2m vs best |
| Ownership | 2.7%(best) | 1.9%−0.8% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 1.9%(best) | 0.4%−1.5% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
E.Le Fée leads 2 of 2
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9 | 9 |
| Start rate | 100% | 100% |
| Minutes (season) | 776(best) | 715−61 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 86(best) | 79−7 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
E.Le Fée leads 5 of 6
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 86(best) | 75−11 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.30(best) | 0.06−0.24 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.26(best) | 0.04−0.22 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.57(best) | 0.10−0.47 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 6.17(best) | 6.00−0.17 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.87+0.64 vs best | 1.23(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Split
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 35−3 vs best | 38(best) |
| Goals | 2 | 2 |
| Assists | 1 | 1 |
| Total xG | 3.04(best) | 1.40−1.64 vs best |
| Total xA | 1.80(best) | 0.90−0.90 vs best |
| DC (season) | 51−12 vs best | 63(best) |
See alsoMidfielder stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
Split
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | 1st choice(best) | 4th choice |
| Direct free kicks | 3rd choice | 1st choice(best) |
| Penalties | 2nd choice(best) | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 1+1 vs best | 0(best) |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Split
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 164(best) | 148−16 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 18.8(best) | 13.0−5.8 vs best |
| Bonus | 2−3 vs best | 5(best) |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.2−0.1 vs best | 0.3(best) |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
E.Le Fée leads 1 of 1
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | CHE (H) 10 AVL (A) 11 TOT (H) 12 LIV (A) 13 NEW (A) 14 | BHA (A) 10 EVE (H) 11 MUN (A) 12 ARS (H) 13 MCI (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.40(best) | 3.60+0.20 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
E.Le Fée leads 4 of 5
| Stat | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 4.2(best) 23rd MID · 59th overall | 4.0 26th MID · 69th overall |
| ICT index | 53.3(best) 22nd MID · 30th overall | 43.6 33rd MID · 50th overall |
| Selected | 37th MID(best) 111th overall | 44th MID 131st overall |
| Points per game | 3.9 36th MID · 98th overall | 4.2(best) 29th MID · 74th overall |
| Cost rank | 70th MID(best) 112th overall | 82nd MID 134th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
E.Le FéeSUN
- SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
- SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance
Lewis-PotterBRE
- BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
- BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Lewis-Potter (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals, E.Le Fée (SUN) 2.0 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- E.Le Fée−1.0E.Le Fée: 2 goals from 3.04 xG (−1.0)
- Lewis-Potter+0.6Lewis-Potter: 2 goals from 1.40 xG (+0.6)
E.Le Fée has 1.0 fewer goals than xG; Lewis-Potter has 0.6 more goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- E.Le Fée−0.8E.Le Fée: 1 assists from 1.80 xA (−0.8)
- Lewis-Potter+0.1Lewis-Potter: 1 assists from 0.90 xA (+0.1)
E.Le Fée has 0.8 fewer assists than xA.
Where do their FPL points come from?
E.Le Fée · 35 pts49% from appearances
−2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Lewis-Potter · 38 pts45% from appearances
| Source | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 17 |
| Goals | 10 | 10 |
| Assists | 3 | 3 |
| Clean sheets | 2 | 3 |
| Defensive contribution | 2 | 0 |
| Bonus | 2 | 5 |
| Deductions | −2 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 38 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- E.Le Fée4.3(3)
- Lewis-Potter2.0(2)
Medium (FDR 3)
- E.Le Fée3.0(1)
- Lewis-Potter5.3(4)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- E.Le Fée3.8(5)
- Lewis-Potter4.3(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Lewis-Potter 4.3 points per game, E.Le Fée 3.8 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- E.Le Fée2.0(4)
- Lewis-Potter5.4(5)
Away
- E.Le Fée5.4(5)
- Lewis-Potter2.8(4)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: E.Le Fée 5.4 points per game, Lewis-Potter 2.8 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
E.Le Fée43%
2 goals and 1 assist of 7 SUN goals
Lewis-Potter19%
2 goals and 1 assist of 16 BRE goals
E.Le Fée is involved in 43% of SUN's goals, against 19% for Lewis-Potter.
Who is a rotation risk?
E.Le Fée5 of 9 full games
5 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89
Lewis-Potter3 of 9 full games
3 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- E.Le Fée159.2
- Lewis-Potter171.2
Creativity
- E.Le Fée252.2
- Lewis-Potter162.7
Threat
- E.Le Fée119.0
- Lewis-Potter103.0
FPL's season ICT scores. E.Le Fée's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Lewis-Potter's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- E.Le Fée−4.0k6.7k out2.7k in
- Lewis-Potter−4.2k6.8k out2.6k in
Managers are selling all of them; E.Le Fée the least (−4.0k net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- E.Le Fée
- Lewis-Potter
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
E.Le Fée, gameweek 4: 0 points v ARS home, 90 minutesLewis-Potter, gameweek 4: 1 points v BOU away, 59 minutesGW 5
E.Le Fée, gameweek 5: 5 points v MCI away, 90 minutesLewis-Potter, gameweek 5: 3 points v CHE home, 80 minutesGW 6
E.Le Fée, gameweek 6: 2 points v BHA home, 80 minutesLewis-Potter, gameweek 6: 2 points v AVL away, 66 minutesGW 7
E.Le Fée, gameweek 7: 4 points v BOU away, 90 minutesLewis-Potter, gameweek 7: 9 points v LIV home, 76 minutesGW 8
E.Le Fée, gameweek 8: 3 points v LEE home, 78 minutesLewis-Potter, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 77 minutesGW 9
E.Le Fée, gameweek 9: 8 points v COV away, 90 minutesLewis-Potter, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 90 minutes
E.Le Fée: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Lewis-Potter: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 5 | 3 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | 9 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 |
| 9 | 8 | 3 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 59 |
| 5 | 90 | 80 |
| 6 | 80 | 66 |
| 7 | 90 | 76 |
| 8 | 78 | 77 |
| 9 | 90 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.85 | 0.03 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| 7 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| 8 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.59 | 0.13 |
| 5 | 0.52 | 0.01 |
| 6 | 0.25 | 0.04 |
| 7 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| 8 | 0.17 | 0.02 |
| 9 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.44 | 0.16 |
| 5 | 0.52 | 0.16 |
| 6 | 0.27 | 0.08 |
| 7 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
| 8 | 0.27 | 0.02 |
| 9 | 0.88 | 0.02 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4 | 2 |
| 5 | 3 | 9 |
| 6 | 4 | 5 |
| 7 | 12 | 5 |
| 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 9 | 11 | 10 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4.2% | 2.1% |
| 5 | 3.4% | 1.7% |
| 6 | 3.2% | 1.6% |
| 7 | 3.0% | 1.5% |
| 8 | 2.9% | 2.0% |
| 9 | 2.8% | 2.0% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.8m | £5.5m |
| 5 | £5.8m | £5.5m |
| 6 | £5.7m | £5.5m |
| 7 | £5.7m | £5.5m |
| 8 | £5.7m | £5.5m |
| 9 | £5.7m | £5.5m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | E.Le Fée | Lewis-Potter |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 4.2% | 0.5% |
| 6 | 2.5% | 0.3% |
| 7 | 2.1% | 0.3% |
| 8 | 1.8% | 0.4% |
| 9 | 1.9% | 0.4% |

