How do Ballard and Chilwell compare?

Ballard has more season points (14 vs 8), Ballard is more owned (1% vs 0.3%), Chilwell is cheaper (4.4m vs 4.7m), Ballard has the higher Start rate (56% vs 0%), but Chilwell has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.40).

← Back to players Pick different players

Ballard

20 stats won

Chilwell

5 stats won

Who wins more stats: Ballard or Chilwell?

Ballard wins 20 of 25 stats

Ballard wins 20 of the 25 stats with an outright best. Others: Chilwell 5.

Points
Ballard: 14Chilwell: 8
xGI (6 gw)
Ballard: 0.04Chilwell: 0.02
Price
Ballard: £4.7mChilwell: £4.4m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionBallardChilwell
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form41
Season totals51
Set pieces00
Bonus11
Fixtures01
FPL ranks31
Total205

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Ballard: Points 14, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 31, Mins (6 gw) 30, DC (6 gw) 3.3, Upcoming FDR 3.40. Chilwell: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 21, Mins (6 gw) 2, DC (6 gw) 0.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Ballard leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatBallardChilwell
Price

4.7m(best)

4.4m−0.3m vs best

Ownership

1%(best)

0.3%−1% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.1%(best)

0.0%−0.1% vs best

Availability

0% · Hamstring injury - Unknown return date

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ballard leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatBallardChilwell
Starts

5(best)

0−5 vs best

Start rate

56%(best)

0%−56% vs best

Minutes (season)

450(best)

29−421 vs best

Avg minutes

50(best)

4−46 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Ballard leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatBallardChilwell
Mins (6 gw)

30(best)

2−28 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.02−0.02 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xGI (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.02−0.02 vs best

DC (6 gw)

3.33(best)

0.17−3.16 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.78+0.69 vs best

0.09(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Ballard leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatBallardChilwell
Points

14(best)

8−6 vs best

Goals

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.31(best)

0.27−0.04 vs best

Total xA

0.16(best)

0.01−0.15 vs best

DC (season)

49(best)

1−48 vs best

Clean sheets

1(best)

0−1 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatBallardChilwell
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Split
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatBallardChilwell
BPS

31(best)

21−10 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

-2.0−2.2 vs best

0.2(best)

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Chilwell leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatBallardChilwell
Next 5 GWs

CHE

(H)

10

AVL

(A)

11

TOT

(H)

12

LIV

(A)

13

NEW

(A)

14

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.40+0.40 vs best

3.00(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Ballard leads 3 of 4
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatBallardChilwell
Form

0.0

200th DEF · 545th overall

0.0

177th DEF · 464th overall

ICT index

16.3(best)

81st DEF · 226th overall

5.9

124th DEF · 346th overall

Selected

72nd DEF(best)

182nd overall

106th DEF

299th overall

Points per game

2.8

73rd DEF · 183rd overall

4.0(best)

41st DEF · 88th overall

Cost rank

81st DEF(best)

423rd overall

129th DEF

525th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • BallardSUN

    1. SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
    2. SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance

  • ChilwellCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Ballard (SUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets, Chilwell (CRY) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Ballard−0.3Ballard: 0 goals from 0.31 xG (−0.3)
  • Chilwell+0.7Chilwell: 1 goals from 0.27 xG (+0.7)

Chilwell has 0.7 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Ballard−0.2Ballard: 0 assists from 0.16 xA (−0.2)
  • Chilwell±0.0Chilwell: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Ballard+1.3Ballard: 10 conceded from 8.66 xGC (+1.3)
  • Chilwell−0.1Chilwell: 1 conceded from 1.12 xGC (−0.1)

Ballard has conceded 1.3 more than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Ballard · 14 pts50% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Chilwell · 8 pts75% from goals

Season points by source
SourceBallardChilwell
Appearances102
Goals06
Clean sheets40
Defensive contribution60
Deductions−60
Total148

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Ballard4.0(2)
  • Chilwell1.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • BallardNo games
  • Chilwell7.0(1)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Ballard2.0(3)
  • ChilwellNo games

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Ballard4.0(2)
  • Chilwell1.0(1)

Away

  • Ballard2.0(3)
  • Chilwell7.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Chilwell 7.0 points per game, Ballard 2.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Ballard0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 6 SUN goals

  • Chilwell20%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 5 CRY goals

Chilwell is involved in 20% of CRY's goals, against 0% for Ballard.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Ballard5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 4 × Didn't play

  • Chilwell0 of 7 full games

    2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Ballard104.2
  • Chilwell33.4

Creativity

  • Ballard23.8
  • Chilwell4.2

Threat

  • Ballard35.0
  • Chilwell21.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Ballard's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Chilwell's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Ballard−4.4k4.4k out15 in
  • Chilwell−697824 out127 in

Managers are selling all of them; Chilwell the least (−697 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Ballard 3.0 points per £m (83rd), Chilwell 1.8 points per £m (109th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Ballard
  • Chilwell

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Ballard 2, Chilwell 1.

How far ahead is Ballard? Above zero Ballard leads; below, Chilwell.

Ballard is 1 point ahead of Chilwell over these gameweeks. Ballard's biggest lead was 1 (GW 5); Chilwell's was 1 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Ballard, gameweek 4: 0 points v ARS home, 90 minutes
    Chilwell, gameweek 4: 1 points v IPS home, 13 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Ballard, gameweek 5: 2 points v MCI away, 90 minutes
    Chilwell, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Ballard, gameweek 6: 0 points v BHA home, 0 minutes
    Chilwell, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Ballard, gameweek 7: 0 points v BOU away, 0 minutes
    Chilwell, gameweek 7: 0 points v BHA away, 0 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Ballard, gameweek 8: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutes
    Chilwell, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Ballard, gameweek 9: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutes
    Chilwell, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes

Ballard: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Chilwell: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
401
520
600
700
800
900

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
49013
5900
600
700
800
900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
40.080.12
50.140.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
40.010.01
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
40.090.13
50.140.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
461
5140
600
700
800
900

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
41.880.55
52.820.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
43.0%0.6%
52.6%0.5%
61.8%0.4%
71.4%0.3%
81.2%0.3%
91.0%0.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
4£4.9m£4.5m
5£4.9m£4.5m
6£4.9m£4.5m
7£4.8m£4.4m
8£4.8m£4.4m
9£4.8m£4.4m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWBallardChilwell
4——
52.3%0.1%
61.1%0.1%
70.5%0.0%
80.3%0.0%
90.1%0.0%