How do Palmer and Penders compare?
Penders has more season points (7 vs 0), Palmer is more owned (3.5% vs 0.3%), Palmer is cheaper (4.0m vs 4.4m), but Penders has the higher Start rate (22% vs 0%).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Penders wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Palmer or Penders?
Penders wins 15 of 19 stats
Penders wins 15 of the 19 stats with an outright best. Others: Palmer 4.
- Points
- Palmer: 0Penders: 7
- Saves
- Palmer: 0Penders: 7
- Price
- Palmer: £4.0mPenders: £4.4m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 1 | 1 |
| Season totals | 0 | 3 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 0 | 2 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 1 | 4 |
| Total | 4 | 15 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Palmer leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.0m−0.4m vs best | 4.4m(best) |
| Ownership | 3.5%(best) | 0.3%−3.2% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 5.0%(best) | 0.4%−4.6% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Penders leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0−2 vs best | 2(best) |
| Start rate | 0%−22% vs best | 22%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 0−195 vs best | 195(best) |
| Avg minutes | 0−22 vs best | 22(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 0−33 vs best | 33(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.00(best) | 0.35+0.35 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Penders leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0−7 vs best | 7(best) |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Clean sheets | 0−1 vs best | 1(best) |
| Saves | 0−7 vs best | 7(best) |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Penders leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 0−31 vs best | 31(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 0.0−5.2 vs best | 5.2(best) |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BOU (H) 10 TOT (A) 11 AVL (H) 12 COV (A) 13 LEE (A) 14 | SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Penders leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 0.0 31st GK · 410th overall | 1.8(best) 19th GK · 203rd overall |
| ICT index | 0.0 34th GK · 465th overall | 3.6(best) 23rd GK · 377th overall |
| Selected | 14th GK(best) 96th overall | 39th GK 291st overall |
| Points per game | 0.0 34th GK · 467th overall | 2.3(best) 18th GK · 227th overall |
| Cost rank | 57th GK 598th overall | 47th GK(best) 549th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
PalmerIPS
- IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance
PendersCHE
- CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
- CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Penders (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Palmer (IPS) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Palmer±0.0Palmer: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
- Penders−0.1Penders: 2 conceded from 2.10 xGC (−0.1)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Palmer · 0 pts
Penders · 7 pts45% from appearances
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 0 | 5 |
| Clean sheets | 0 | 4 |
| Saves | 0 | 2 |
| Deductions | 0 | −4 |
| Total | 0 | 7 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- PalmerNo games
- PendersNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- PalmerNo games
- Penders2.3(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- PalmerNo games
- PendersNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- PalmerNo games
- Penders3.0(2)
Away
- PalmerNo games
- Penders1.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Palmer
No IPS goals yet in matches played
Penders0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 4 CHE goals
Who is a rotation risk?
Palmer0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Penders2 of 9 full games
2 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 6 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Palmer0.0
- Penders35.6
Creativity
- Palmer0.0
- Penders0.0
Threat
- Palmer0.0
- Penders0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Palmer's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Penders's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Palmer−3.4k4.3k out900 in
- Penders+4.3k858 out5.2k in
Penders has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+4.3k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Palmer
- Penders
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Palmer, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutesPenders, gameweek 4: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutesGW 5
Palmer, gameweek 5: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutesPenders, gameweek 5: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutesGW 6
Palmer, gameweek 6: 0 points v FUL home, 0 minutesPenders, gameweek 6: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutesGW 7
Palmer, gameweek 7: 0 points v MCI away, 0 minutesPenders, gameweek 7: 1 points v EVE away, 15 minutesGW 8
Palmer, gameweek 8: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutesPenders, gameweek 8: 0 points v TOT home, 90 minutesGW 9
Palmer, gameweek 9: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutesPenders, gameweek 9: 6 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
Palmer: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Penders: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 6 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 15 |
| 8 | 0 | 90 |
| 9 | 0 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4.2% | 0.1% |
| 5 | 4.0% | 0.1% |
| 6 | 3.8% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 3.7% | 0.1% |
| 8 | 3.6% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 3.5% | 0.3% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
| 5 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
| 6 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
| 7 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
| 8 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
| 9 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Palmer | Penders |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 4.0% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 4.9% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 4.6% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 5.0% | 0.4% |

