How do Forster and Scherpen compare?
Scherpen has more season points (7 vs 0), Forster is more owned (3.4% vs 0.5%), Forster is cheaper (4.0m vs 4.4m), but Scherpen has the higher Start rate (44% vs 0%).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Scherpen wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Forster or Scherpen?
Scherpen wins 14 of 18 stats
Scherpen wins 14 of the 18 stats with an outright best. Others: Forster 4.
- Points
- Forster: 0Scherpen: 7
- Saves
- Forster: 0Scherpen: 15
- Price
- Forster: £4.0mScherpen: £4.4m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 1 | 1 |
| Season totals | 0 | 3 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 0 | 2 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 4 | 14 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Forster leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.0m−0.4m vs best | 4.4m(best) |
| Ownership | 3.4%(best) | 0.5%−2.9% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 2.9%(best) | 0.3%−2.6% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Scherpen leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0−4 vs best | 4(best) |
| Start rate | 0%−44% vs best | 44%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 0−360 vs best | 360(best) |
| Avg minutes | 0−40 vs best | 40(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 0−15 vs best | 15(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.00(best) | 0.10+0.10 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Scherpen leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0−7 vs best | 7(best) |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.00−0.01 vs best | 0.01(best) |
| Clean sheets | 0 | 0 |
| Saves | 0−15 vs best | 15(best) |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Scherpen leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 0−40 vs best | 40(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 0.0−1.0 vs best | 1.0(best) |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | IPS (A) 10 NFO (H) 11 FUL (A) 12 BHA (H) 13 HUL (H) 14 | BOU (H) 10 TOT (A) 11 AVL (H) 12 COV (A) 13 LEE (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Scherpen leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 0.0 24th GK · 401st overall | 0.0 53rd GK · 468th overall |
| ICT index | 0.0 27th GK · 456th overall | 10.3(best) 22nd GK · 289th overall |
| Selected | 15th GK(best) 97th overall | 35th GK 254th overall |
| Points per game | 0.0 27th GK · 458th overall | 1.8(best) 24th GK · 288th overall |
| Cost rank | 50th GK 589th overall | 43rd GK(best) 532nd overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
ForsterBOU
- BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
- BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance
ScherpenIPS
- IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
- IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Forster (BOU) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Scherpen (IPS) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Forster±0.0Forster: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
- Scherpen+3.3Scherpen: 10 conceded from 6.74 xGC (+3.3)
Scherpen has conceded 3.3 more than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Forster · 0 pts
Scherpen · 7 pts62% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 0 | 8 |
| Saves | 0 | 5 |
| Deductions | 0 | −6 |
| Total | 0 | 7 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- ForsterNo games
- Scherpen1.5(2)
Medium (FDR 3)
- ForsterNo games
- Scherpen2.0(1)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- ForsterNo games
- Scherpen2.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- ForsterNo games
- Scherpen2.0(2)
Away
- ForsterNo games
- Scherpen1.5(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Forster
No BOU goals yet in matches played
Scherpen0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 7 IPS goals
Who is a rotation risk?
Forster0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Scherpen4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 5 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Forster0.0
- Scherpen103.6
Creativity
- Forster0.0
- Scherpen0.0
Threat
- Forster0.0
- Scherpen0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Forster's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Scherpen's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Forster−2.4k4.4k out2.0k in
- Scherpen−536610 out74 in
Managers are selling all of them; Scherpen the least (−536 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Forster
- Scherpen
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Forster, gameweek 4: 0 points v BRE home, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 4: 1 points v CRY away, 90 minutesGW 5
Forster, gameweek 5: 0 points v LIV home, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 5: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutesGW 6
Forster, gameweek 6: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 6: 0 points v FUL home, 0 minutesGW 7
Forster, gameweek 7: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 7: 0 points v MCI away, 0 minutesGW 8
Forster, gameweek 8: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 8: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutesGW 9
Forster, gameweek 9: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutesScherpen, gameweek 9: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes
Forster: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Scherpen: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 90 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3.6% | 0.6% |
| 5 | 3.6% | 0.6% |
| 6 | 3.5% | 0.6% |
| 7 | 3.5% | 0.5% |
| 8 | 3.5% | 0.5% |
| 9 | 3.4% | 0.5% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.0m | £4.5m |
| 5 | £4.0m | £4.5m |
| 6 | £4.0m | £4.5m |
| 7 | £4.0m | £4.5m |
| 8 | £4.0m | £4.5m |
| 9 | £4.0m | £4.4m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Scherpen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 2.9% | 0.7% |
| 6 | 2.8% | 0.5% |
| 7 | 3.1% | 0.4% |
| 8 | 2.9% | 0.3% |
| 9 | 2.9% | 0.3% |

