How do Forster and Lecomte compare?
Forster and Lecomte are level on season points (0), Forster is more owned (3.4% vs 1.1%), but Forster has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.40).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Forster wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Forster or Lecomte?
Forster wins 5 of 5 stats
Forster wins 5 of the 5 stats with an outright best. Others: Lecomte 0.
- Points
- Forster: 0Lecomte: 0
- Saves
- Forster: 0Lecomte: 0
- Price
- Forster: £4.0mLecomte: £4.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 0 |
| Playing time | 0 | 0 |
| Recent form | 0 | 0 |
| Season totals | 0 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 2 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Forster leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 4.0m | 4.0m |
| Ownership | 3.4%(best) | 1.1%−2.3% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 2.9%(best) | 2.2%−0.7% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 0 | 0 |
| Start rate | 0% | 0% |
| Minutes (season) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg minutes | 0 | 0 |
Who has better recent form?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 0 | 0 |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Who has scored more this season?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Clean sheets | 0 | 0 |
| Saves | 0 | 0 |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
No outright winner
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 0 | 0 |
| BPS (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Bonus | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Forster leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | IPS (A) 10 NFO (H) 11 FUL (A) 12 BHA (H) 13 HUL (H) 14 | NEW (H) 10 MCI (A) 11 BOU (H) 12 TOT (A) 13 EVE (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80(best) | 3.40+0.60 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Forster leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 0.0 24th GK · 401st overall | 0.0 29th GK · 407th overall |
| ICT index | 0.0 27th GK · 456th overall | 0.0 32nd GK · 462nd overall |
| Selected | 15th GK(best) 97th overall | 24th GK 171st overall |
| Points per game | 0.0 27th GK · 458th overall | 0.0 32nd GK · 464th overall |
| Cost rank | 50th GK(best) 589th overall | 55th GK 595th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
ForsterBOU
- BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
- BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance
LecomteFUL
- FUL v NEW home, gameweek 10: 1.54 projected goals, 33% clean sheet chance
- FUL v MCI away, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 12% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Forster (BOU) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Lecomte (FUL) 0.4 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Forster±0.0Forster: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
- Lecomte±0.0Lecomte: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Forster · 0 pts
Lecomte · 0 pts
| Source | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- ForsterNo games
- LecomteNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- ForsterNo games
- LecomteNo games
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- ForsterNo games
- LecomteNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- ForsterNo games
- LecomteNo games
Away
- ForsterNo games
- LecomteNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Forster
No BOU goals yet in matches played
Lecomte
No FUL goals yet in matches played
Who is a rotation risk?
Forster0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Lecomte0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Forster0.0
- Lecomte0.0
Creativity
- Forster0.0
- Lecomte0.0
Threat
- Forster0.0
- Lecomte0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Forster's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Lecomte's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Forster−2.4k4.4k out2.0k in
- Lecomte−448990 out542 in
Managers are selling all of them; Lecomte the least (−448 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Forster
- Lecomte
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Forster, gameweek 4: 0 points v BRE home, 0 minutesLecomte, gameweek 4: 0 points v LIV away, 0 minutesGW 5
Forster, gameweek 5: 0 points v LIV home, 0 minutesLecomte, gameweek 5: 0 points v MUN home, 0 minutesGW 6
Forster, gameweek 6: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutesLecomte, gameweek 6: 0 points v IPS away, 0 minutesGW 7
Forster, gameweek 7: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutesLecomte, gameweek 7: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutesGW 8
Forster, gameweek 8: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutesLecomte, gameweek 8: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutesGW 9
Forster, gameweek 9: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutesLecomte, gameweek 9: 0 points v AVL away, 0 minutes
Forster: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Lecomte: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3.6% | 1.2% |
| 5 | 3.6% | 1.1% |
| 6 | 3.5% | 1.1% |
| 7 | 3.5% | 1.1% |
| 8 | 3.5% | 1.1% |
| 9 | 3.4% | 1.1% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £4.0m | £4.0m |
| 5 | £4.0m | £4.0m |
| 6 | £4.0m | £4.0m |
| 7 | £4.0m | £4.0m |
| 8 | £4.0m | £4.0m |
| 9 | £4.0m | £4.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Forster | Lecomte |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| 6 | 2.8% | 1.7% |
| 7 | 3.1% | 2.2% |
| 8 | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| 9 | 2.9% | 2.2% |

