How do Akpom and Hirst compare?

Akpom has more season points (11 vs 0), but Akpom is more owned (0.9% vs 0.1%).

← Back to players Pick different players

Akpom

17 stats won

Hirst

1 stats won

Who wins more stats: Akpom or Hirst?

Akpom wins 17 of 18 stats

Akpom wins 17 of the 18 stats with an outright best. Others: Hirst 1.

Points
Akpom: 11Hirst: 0
xGI (6 gw)
Akpom: 0.06Hirst: 0.00
Price
Akpom: £5.0mHirst: £5.0m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionAkpomHirst
Price & ownership10
Playing time20
Recent form41
Season totals30
Set pieces00
Bonus20
Fixtures00
FPL ranks50
Total171

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Akpom: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 54, Mins (6 gw) 8, xG (6 gw) 0.06, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Hirst: Points 0, xGI (6 gw) 0.00, BPS 0, Mins (6 gw) 0, xG (6 gw) 0.00, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Akpom leads 1 of 1
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatAkpomHirst
Price

5.0m

5.0m

Ownership

0.9%(best)

0.1%−0.8% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

Available

0% · Has joined Stoke City permanently

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Akpom leads 2 of 2
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatAkpomHirst
Starts

0

0

Start rate

0%

0%

Minutes (season)

114(best)

0−114 vs best

Avg minutes

13(best)

0−13 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Akpom leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatAkpomHirst
Mins (6 gw)

8(best)

0−8 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.06(best)

0.00−0.06 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xGI (6 gw)

0.06(best)

0.00−0.06 vs best

DC (6 gw)

0.33(best)

0.00−0.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.32+0.32 vs best

0.00(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Akpom leads 3 of 3
Who has scored more this season?
StatAkpomHirst
Points

11(best)

0−11 vs best

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0

0

Total xG

1.30(best)

0.00−1.30 vs best

Total xA

0.00

0.00

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatAkpomHirst
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Akpom leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatAkpomHirst
BPS

54(best)

0−54 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

3.5(best)

0.0−3.5 vs best

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatAkpomHirst
Next 5 GWs

BOU

(H)

10

TOT

(A)

11

AVL

(H)

12

COV

(A)

13

LEE

(A)

14

BOU

(H)

10

TOT

(A)

11

AVL

(H)

12

COV

(A)

13

LEE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80

2.80

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Akpom leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatAkpomHirst
Form

1.0(best)

27th FWD · 278th overall

0.0

59th FWD · 593rd overall

ICT index

7.7(best)

36th FWD · 322nd overall

0.0

67th FWD · 619th overall

Selected

27th FWD(best)

195th overall

66th FWD

484th overall

Points per game

1.6(best)

33rd FWD · 306th overall

0.0

67th FWD · 619th overall

Cost rank

51st FWD(best)

249th overall

52nd FWD

267th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • AkpomIPS

    1. IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance

  • HirstIPS

    1. IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Akpom (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals, Hirst (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Akpom−0.3Akpom: 1 goals from 1.30 xG (−0.3)
  • Hirst±0.0Hirst: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Akpom±0.0Akpom: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
  • Hirst±0.0Hirst: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Akpom · 11 pts64% from appearances

  • Hirst · 0 pts

Season points by source
SourceAkpomHirst
Appearances70
Goals40
Deductions00
Total110

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Akpom1.0(3)
  • HirstNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Akpom2.3(3)
  • HirstNo games

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Akpom1.0(1)
  • HirstNo games

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Akpom1.0(3)
  • HirstNo games

Away

  • Akpom2.0(4)
  • HirstNo games

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Akpom9%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 11 IPS goals

  • Hirst

    No IPS goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Akpom0 of 9 full games

    7 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

  • Hirst0 of 9 full games

    9 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Akpom37.6
  • Hirst0.0

Creativity

  • Akpom5.7
  • Hirst0.0

Threat

  • Akpom34.0
  • Hirst0.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Akpom's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Hirst's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Akpom−3.1k3.5k out467 in
  • Hirst−101101 out0 in

Managers are selling all of them; Hirst the least (−101 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Akpom 2.2 points per £m (28th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Akpom
  • Hirst

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Akpom 5, Hirst 0.

How far ahead is Akpom? Above zero Akpom leads; below, Hirst.

Akpom is 5 points ahead of Hirst over these gameweeks. Akpom's biggest lead was 5 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Akpom, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutes
    Hirst, gameweek 4: 0 points v CRY away, 0 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Akpom, gameweek 5: 1 points v EVE away, 9 minutes
    Hirst, gameweek 5: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Akpom, gameweek 6: 1 points v FUL home, 19 minutes
    Hirst, gameweek 6: 0 points v FUL home, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Akpom, gameweek 7: 1 points v MCI away, 12 minutes
    Hirst, gameweek 7: 0 points v MCI away, 0 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Akpom, gameweek 8: 1 points v NFO home, 4 minutes
    Hirst, gameweek 8: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Akpom, gameweek 9: 1 points v HUL away, 1 minutes
    Hirst, gameweek 9: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes

Akpom: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Hirst: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
400
510
610
710
810
910

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
400
590
6190
7120
840
910

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
40.000.00
50.170.00
60.160.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
40.000.00
50.170.00
60.160.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
400
500
610
710
800
900

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
41.2%0.1%
51.2%0.1%
61.1%0.1%
71.1%0.1%
81.0%0.1%
90.9%0.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
4£5.0m£5.0m
5£5.0m£5.0m
6£5.0m£5.0m
7£5.0m£5.0m
8£5.0m£5.0m
9£5.0m£5.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWAkpomHirst
4——
50.6%0.0%
60.2%0.0%
70.1%0.0%
80.1%0.0%
90.0%0.0%